多发性硬化症的疾病调整治疗会影响细胞对 EBNA-1 肽的免疫反应。

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lara Dungan, Jean Dunne, Michael Savio, Marianna Kalaszi, Matt McElheron, Yvonne Lynagh, Kate O'Driscoll, Carmel Roche, Ammara Qureshi, Brendan Crowley, Niall Conlon, Hugh Kearney
{"title":"多发性硬化症的疾病调整治疗会影响细胞对 EBNA-1 肽的免疫反应。","authors":"Lara Dungan, Jean Dunne, Michael Savio, Marianna Kalaszi, Matt McElheron, Yvonne Lynagh, Kate O'Driscoll, Carmel Roche, Ammara Qureshi, Brendan Crowley, Niall Conlon, Hugh Kearney","doi":"10.1212/NXI.0000000000200217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has been strongly implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS). Despite this, there are no routinely used tests to measure cellular response to EBV. In this study, we analyzed the cellular response to EBV nuclear antigen-1 (EBNA-1) in people with MS (pwMS) using a whole blood assay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study took place in a dedicated MS clinic in a university hospital. We recruited healthy controls, people with epilepsy (PWE), and pwMS taking a range of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) including natalizumab, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), dimethyl fumarate (DMF), and also treatment naïve. Whole blood samples were stimulated with commercially available PepTivator EBNA1 peptides and a control virus-cytomegalovirus (CMV) peptide. We recorded the cellular response to stimulation with both interferon gamma (IFN-γ) and interleukin-2 (IL-2). We also compared the cellular responses to EBNA1 with IgG responses to EBNA1, viral capsid antigen (VCA), and EBV viral load.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 86 pwMS, with relapsing remitting MS, in this group, and we observed a higher level of cellular response recorded with IFN-γ (0.79 IU/mL ± 1.36) vs healthy controls (0.29 IU/mL ± 0.90, <i>p</i> = 0.0048) and PWE (0.17 IU/mL ± 0.33, <i>p</i> = 0.0088). Treatment with either anti-CD20 mAbs (0.28 IU/mL ± 0.57) or DMF (0.07 IU/mL ± 0.15) resulted in a cellular response equivalent to control levels or in PWE (<i>p</i> = 0.26). The results of recording IL-2 response were concordant with IFN-γ: with suppression also seen with anti-CD20 mAbs and DMF. By contrast, we did not record any differential effect of DMTs on the levels of IgG to either EBNA-1 or VCA. Nor did we observe differences in cellular response to cytomegalovirus between groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study demonstrates how testing and recording the cellular response to EBNA-1 in pwMS may be beneficial. EBNA-1 stimulation of whole blood samples produced higher levels of IFN-γ and IL-2 in pwMS compared with controls and PWE. In addition, we show a differential effect of currently available DMTs on this response. The functional assay deployed uses whole blood samples with minimal preprocessing suggesting that employment as a treatment response measure in clinical trials targeting EBV may be possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":19472,"journal":{"name":"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disease-Modifying Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis Affect Measures of Cellular Immune Responses to EBNA-1 Peptides.\",\"authors\":\"Lara Dungan, Jean Dunne, Michael Savio, Marianna Kalaszi, Matt McElheron, Yvonne Lynagh, Kate O'Driscoll, Carmel Roche, Ammara Qureshi, Brendan Crowley, Niall Conlon, Hugh Kearney\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/NXI.0000000000200217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has been strongly implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS). Despite this, there are no routinely used tests to measure cellular response to EBV. In this study, we analyzed the cellular response to EBV nuclear antigen-1 (EBNA-1) in people with MS (pwMS) using a whole blood assay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study took place in a dedicated MS clinic in a university hospital. We recruited healthy controls, people with epilepsy (PWE), and pwMS taking a range of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) including natalizumab, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), dimethyl fumarate (DMF), and also treatment naïve. Whole blood samples were stimulated with commercially available PepTivator EBNA1 peptides and a control virus-cytomegalovirus (CMV) peptide. We recorded the cellular response to stimulation with both interferon gamma (IFN-γ) and interleukin-2 (IL-2). We also compared the cellular responses to EBNA1 with IgG responses to EBNA1, viral capsid antigen (VCA), and EBV viral load.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 86 pwMS, with relapsing remitting MS, in this group, and we observed a higher level of cellular response recorded with IFN-γ (0.79 IU/mL ± 1.36) vs healthy controls (0.29 IU/mL ± 0.90, <i>p</i> = 0.0048) and PWE (0.17 IU/mL ± 0.33, <i>p</i> = 0.0088). Treatment with either anti-CD20 mAbs (0.28 IU/mL ± 0.57) or DMF (0.07 IU/mL ± 0.15) resulted in a cellular response equivalent to control levels or in PWE (<i>p</i> = 0.26). The results of recording IL-2 response were concordant with IFN-γ: with suppression also seen with anti-CD20 mAbs and DMF. By contrast, we did not record any differential effect of DMTs on the levels of IgG to either EBNA-1 or VCA. Nor did we observe differences in cellular response to cytomegalovirus between groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study demonstrates how testing and recording the cellular response to EBNA-1 in pwMS may be beneficial. EBNA-1 stimulation of whole blood samples produced higher levels of IFN-γ and IL-2 in pwMS compared with controls and PWE. In addition, we show a differential effect of currently available DMTs on this response. The functional assay deployed uses whole blood samples with minimal preprocessing suggesting that employment as a treatment response measure in clinical trials targeting EBV may be possible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073890/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000200217\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000200217","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:爱泼斯坦-巴氏病毒(EBV)与多发性硬化症(MS)的发病机制密切相关。尽管如此,目前还没有常规使用的检测方法来测量细胞对 EBV 的反应。在这项研究中,我们使用全血检测法分析了多发性硬化症患者(pwMS)对 EBV 核抗原-1(EBNA-1)的细胞反应:这项横断面研究在一家大学医院的多发性硬化症专科门诊进行。我们招募了健康对照组、癫痫患者(PWE)和正在接受一系列疾病调节治疗(DMT)的多发性硬化症患者,包括纳他珠单抗、抗CD20单克隆抗体(mAbs)、富马酸二甲酯(DMF),以及接受过治疗的新患者。用市售的 PepTivator EBNA1 多肽和对照病毒-巨细胞病毒(CMV)多肽刺激全血样本。我们记录了细胞对γ干扰素(IFN-γ)和白细胞介素-2(IL-2)刺激的反应。我们还将对 EBNA1 的细胞反应与对 EBNA1、病毒壳抗原(VCA)和 EBV 病毒载量的 IgG 反应进行了比较:我们招募了86名复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者,观察到IFN-γ(0.79 IU/mL ± 1.36)与健康对照组(0.29 IU/mL ± 0.90,p = 0.0048)和PWE(0.17 IU/mL ± 0.33,p = 0.0088)相比,细胞反应水平更高。用抗 CD20 mAbs(0.28 IU/mL ± 0.57)或 DMF(0.07 IU/mL ± 0.15)处理会产生与对照组或 PWE 相同的细胞反应(p = 0.26)。IL-2反应的记录结果与IFN-γ一致:抗CD20 mAbs和DMF也能抑制IL-2反应。相比之下,我们没有发现 DMTs 对 EBNA-1 或 VCA 的 IgG 水平有任何不同的影响。我们也没有观察到不同组间对巨细胞病毒的细胞反应存在差异:本研究表明,检测和记录 pwMS 对 EBNA-1 的细胞反应可能是有益的。与对照组和 PWE 相比,EBNA-1 刺激 pwMS 的全血样本可产生更高水平的 IFN-γ 和 IL-2。此外,我们还显示了目前可用的 DMTs 对这种反应的不同影响。这种功能测定使用的是全血样本,只需极少的预处理,这表明在针对 EBV 的临床试验中将其用作治疗反应指标是有可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disease-Modifying Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis Affect Measures of Cellular Immune Responses to EBNA-1 Peptides.

Background and objectives: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has been strongly implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS). Despite this, there are no routinely used tests to measure cellular response to EBV. In this study, we analyzed the cellular response to EBV nuclear antigen-1 (EBNA-1) in people with MS (pwMS) using a whole blood assay.

Methods: This cross-sectional study took place in a dedicated MS clinic in a university hospital. We recruited healthy controls, people with epilepsy (PWE), and pwMS taking a range of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) including natalizumab, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), dimethyl fumarate (DMF), and also treatment naïve. Whole blood samples were stimulated with commercially available PepTivator EBNA1 peptides and a control virus-cytomegalovirus (CMV) peptide. We recorded the cellular response to stimulation with both interferon gamma (IFN-γ) and interleukin-2 (IL-2). We also compared the cellular responses to EBNA1 with IgG responses to EBNA1, viral capsid antigen (VCA), and EBV viral load.

Results: We recruited 86 pwMS, with relapsing remitting MS, in this group, and we observed a higher level of cellular response recorded with IFN-γ (0.79 IU/mL ± 1.36) vs healthy controls (0.29 IU/mL ± 0.90, p = 0.0048) and PWE (0.17 IU/mL ± 0.33, p = 0.0088). Treatment with either anti-CD20 mAbs (0.28 IU/mL ± 0.57) or DMF (0.07 IU/mL ± 0.15) resulted in a cellular response equivalent to control levels or in PWE (p = 0.26). The results of recording IL-2 response were concordant with IFN-γ: with suppression also seen with anti-CD20 mAbs and DMF. By contrast, we did not record any differential effect of DMTs on the levels of IgG to either EBNA-1 or VCA. Nor did we observe differences in cellular response to cytomegalovirus between groups.

Discussion: This study demonstrates how testing and recording the cellular response to EBNA-1 in pwMS may be beneficial. EBNA-1 stimulation of whole blood samples produced higher levels of IFN-γ and IL-2 in pwMS compared with controls and PWE. In addition, we show a differential effect of currently available DMTs on this response. The functional assay deployed uses whole blood samples with minimal preprocessing suggesting that employment as a treatment response measure in clinical trials targeting EBV may be possible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
219
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation is an official journal of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation will be the premier peer-reviewed journal in neuroimmunology and neuroinflammation. This journal publishes rigorously peer-reviewed open-access reports of original research and in-depth reviews of topics in neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation, affecting the full range of neurologic diseases including (but not limited to) Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, ALS, tauopathy, and stroke; multiple sclerosis and NMO; inflammatory peripheral nerve and muscle disease, Guillain-Barré and myasthenia gravis; nervous system infection; paraneoplastic syndromes, noninfectious encephalitides and other antibody-mediated disorders; and psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. Clinical trials, instructive case reports, and small case series will also be featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信