Yeon-Back Jung, Ju-Hyun Mun, Sanghee Kim, Seung-Hyeon Hwang, Jae-Il Sim
{"title":"用自应力钢筋加固的整体建筑接缝的剪切摩擦能力","authors":"Yeon-Back Jung, Ju-Hyun Mun, Sanghee Kim, Seung-Hyeon Hwang, Jae-Il Sim","doi":"10.1680/jmacr.23.00317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the shear friction capacity of a monolithic concrete interface reinforced with newly developed self-prestressed reinforcing steel bars (SPRBs). Twelve push-off specimens with SPRBs were prepared according to the different compressive strengths of concrete (<i>f</i>′<i><sub>c</sub></i>) by applying compressive stresses (<i>σ<sub>x</sub></i>) on a monolithic concrete interface. To compare the shear friction capacities of monolithic concrete interfaces reinforced with conventional reinforcing bars, four companion specimens were prepared. The test results showed that the shear cracking and shear friction capacities were high for specimens with high <i>f</i>′<i><sub>c</sub></i> and <i>σ<sub>x</sub></i> values, resulting in the highest values for specimens with <i>f</i>′<i><sub>c</sub></i> = 40 MPa and <i>σ<sub>x</sub></i> = 0.5<i>f<sub>y</sub></i>, where <i>f<sub>y</sub></i> is the yield strength of the reinforcing steel bar. The test results confirmed that at a similar (<i>ρ<sub>vf</sub>f<sub>y</sub></i>+<i>σ<sub>x</sub></i>)/<i>f</i>′<i><sub>c</sub></i>, a <i>σ<sub>x</sub></i> of more than 0.35<i>f<sub>y</sub></i> is required for the SPRBs to achieve a <i>λ<sub>n</sub></i> value comparable to that of the specimens reinforced with conventional reinforcing bars, where <i>ρ<sub>vf</sub></i> is the transverse reinforcement ratio and <i>λ<sub>n</sub></i> is the shear friction capacity. The prediction models ACI 318-19 and AASHTO significantly underestimated the shear friction capacity with low accuracies. In particular, the difference between the experimental and underpredicted values became large as the (<i>ρ<sub>vf</sub>f<sub>y</sub></i>+<i>σ<sub>x</sub></i>)/<i>f</i>′<i><sub>c</sub></i> value increased. However, the Mattock's model well-estimated the measured shear friction capacities of all the specimens tested in this study, irrespective of <i>ρ<sub>vf</sub>f<sub>y</sub></i> and <i>σ<sub>x</sub></i>. Thus, the mean and standard deviation values of the measured-to-predicted shear friction capacity ratio were 1.07 and 0.13, respectively.","PeriodicalId":18113,"journal":{"name":"Magazine of Concrete Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shear friction capacity of monolithic construction joints reinforced with self-prestressing reinforcing steel bars\",\"authors\":\"Yeon-Back Jung, Ju-Hyun Mun, Sanghee Kim, Seung-Hyeon Hwang, Jae-Il Sim\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jmacr.23.00317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examined the shear friction capacity of a monolithic concrete interface reinforced with newly developed self-prestressed reinforcing steel bars (SPRBs). Twelve push-off specimens with SPRBs were prepared according to the different compressive strengths of concrete (<i>f</i>′<i><sub>c</sub></i>) by applying compressive stresses (<i>σ<sub>x</sub></i>) on a monolithic concrete interface. To compare the shear friction capacities of monolithic concrete interfaces reinforced with conventional reinforcing bars, four companion specimens were prepared. The test results showed that the shear cracking and shear friction capacities were high for specimens with high <i>f</i>′<i><sub>c</sub></i> and <i>σ<sub>x</sub></i> values, resulting in the highest values for specimens with <i>f</i>′<i><sub>c</sub></i> = 40 MPa and <i>σ<sub>x</sub></i> = 0.5<i>f<sub>y</sub></i>, where <i>f<sub>y</sub></i> is the yield strength of the reinforcing steel bar. The test results confirmed that at a similar (<i>ρ<sub>vf</sub>f<sub>y</sub></i>+<i>σ<sub>x</sub></i>)/<i>f</i>′<i><sub>c</sub></i>, a <i>σ<sub>x</sub></i> of more than 0.35<i>f<sub>y</sub></i> is required for the SPRBs to achieve a <i>λ<sub>n</sub></i> value comparable to that of the specimens reinforced with conventional reinforcing bars, where <i>ρ<sub>vf</sub></i> is the transverse reinforcement ratio and <i>λ<sub>n</sub></i> is the shear friction capacity. The prediction models ACI 318-19 and AASHTO significantly underestimated the shear friction capacity with low accuracies. In particular, the difference between the experimental and underpredicted values became large as the (<i>ρ<sub>vf</sub>f<sub>y</sub></i>+<i>σ<sub>x</sub></i>)/<i>f</i>′<i><sub>c</sub></i> value increased. However, the Mattock's model well-estimated the measured shear friction capacities of all the specimens tested in this study, irrespective of <i>ρ<sub>vf</sub>f<sub>y</sub></i> and <i>σ<sub>x</sub></i>. Thus, the mean and standard deviation values of the measured-to-predicted shear friction capacity ratio were 1.07 and 0.13, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magazine of Concrete Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magazine of Concrete Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.23.00317\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magazine of Concrete Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.23.00317","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Shear friction capacity of monolithic construction joints reinforced with self-prestressing reinforcing steel bars
This study examined the shear friction capacity of a monolithic concrete interface reinforced with newly developed self-prestressed reinforcing steel bars (SPRBs). Twelve push-off specimens with SPRBs were prepared according to the different compressive strengths of concrete (f′c) by applying compressive stresses (σx) on a monolithic concrete interface. To compare the shear friction capacities of monolithic concrete interfaces reinforced with conventional reinforcing bars, four companion specimens were prepared. The test results showed that the shear cracking and shear friction capacities were high for specimens with high f′c and σx values, resulting in the highest values for specimens with f′c = 40 MPa and σx = 0.5fy, where fy is the yield strength of the reinforcing steel bar. The test results confirmed that at a similar (ρvffy+σx)/f′c, a σx of more than 0.35fy is required for the SPRBs to achieve a λn value comparable to that of the specimens reinforced with conventional reinforcing bars, where ρvf is the transverse reinforcement ratio and λn is the shear friction capacity. The prediction models ACI 318-19 and AASHTO significantly underestimated the shear friction capacity with low accuracies. In particular, the difference between the experimental and underpredicted values became large as the (ρvffy+σx)/f′c value increased. However, the Mattock's model well-estimated the measured shear friction capacities of all the specimens tested in this study, irrespective of ρvffy and σx. Thus, the mean and standard deviation values of the measured-to-predicted shear friction capacity ratio were 1.07 and 0.13, respectively.
期刊介绍:
For concrete and other cementitious derivatives to be developed further, we need to understand the use of alternative hydraulically active materials used in combination with plain Portland Cement, sustainability and durability issues. Both fundamental and best practice issues need to be addressed.
Magazine of Concrete Research covers every aspect of concrete manufacture and behaviour from performance and evaluation of constituent materials to mix design, testing, durability, structural analysis and composite construction.