与二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂相比,接受葡萄糖钠转运体-2 抑制剂治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者发生白内障和糖尿病视网膜病变的风险更低

Li Yen Goh, Oscar Hou In Chou, Sharen Lee, Teddy Tai Loy Lee, Jeremy Man To Hui, Hugo Pui Hok Him, Wing Tak Wong, Carlin Chang, Bernard M.Y. Cheung, Gary Tse, Jiandong Zhou
{"title":"与二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂相比,接受葡萄糖钠转运体-2 抑制剂治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者发生白内障和糖尿病视网膜病变的风险更低","authors":"Li Yen Goh, Oscar Hou In Chou, Sharen Lee, Teddy Tai Loy Lee, Jeremy Man To Hui, Hugo Pui Hok Him, Wing Tak Wong, Carlin Chang, Bernard M.Y. Cheung, Gary Tse, Jiandong Zhou","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.25.24304828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aims: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an extremely prevalent disease with multisystem complications. We aim to compare the effects of two common glucose lowering medications; sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2I) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4I), on the incidence of diabetic retinopathy and cataracts in T2DM patients in Hong Kong.\nMethods: Retrospective population-based cohort study of T2DM patients treated with SGLT2I or DPP4I between 1st January 2015 and 31st December 2020. Propensity score matching (1:1 ratio) between SGLT2I and DPP4I users was performed on demographics, past co-morbidities, number of prior hospitalizations, duration from T2DM diagnosis to intial drug exposure, non-SGLT2I/DPP4I medications (including other anti-diabetes drugs), abbreviated modification of diet in renal disease, HbA1c, fasting glucose, and their time-weighted means. Sensitivity analysis using a one-year lag time and competing risk analyses using cause-specific and sub-distribution hazard models were conducted.\nResults: This study cohort included 26 165 SGLT2I and 42 796 DPP4I users (total: N=68 961 patients; 56.43% males, median age: 62.0 years old (standard deviation (SD): 12.8)). Over a median follow-up of 5.56 years (IQR: 5.24-5.80) and after propensity score matching (SGLT2I: N=26 165; DPP4I: N=26 165), SGLT2I users had lower incidences of cataract (4.54% vs. 6.64%%, standardised mean difference [SMD]=0.09) and diabetic retinopathy (3.65 vs. 6.19, SMD=0.12) compared to DPP4I users. SGLT2I use was associated with lower risks of new onset cataract (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: [0.62-0.72] P<0.0001) and diabetic retinopathy (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.53-0.62], P<0.0001). These associations remained significant on multivariable Cox regression ;cataract: HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.64-0.75 (P<0.0001); diabetic retinopathy: HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.63-0.75 (P<0.0001).\nConclusions: Amongst T2DM patients in Hong Kong, SGLT2I use was associated with lower risks of new onset cataract or diabetic retinopathy compared to DPP4I use.","PeriodicalId":501390,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Ophthalmology","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lower Risk of Incident Cataracts and Diabetic Retinopathy amongst Individuals Treated with Sodium Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor Compared to Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus\",\"authors\":\"Li Yen Goh, Oscar Hou In Chou, Sharen Lee, Teddy Tai Loy Lee, Jeremy Man To Hui, Hugo Pui Hok Him, Wing Tak Wong, Carlin Chang, Bernard M.Y. Cheung, Gary Tse, Jiandong Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.03.25.24304828\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background/Aims: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an extremely prevalent disease with multisystem complications. We aim to compare the effects of two common glucose lowering medications; sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2I) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4I), on the incidence of diabetic retinopathy and cataracts in T2DM patients in Hong Kong.\\nMethods: Retrospective population-based cohort study of T2DM patients treated with SGLT2I or DPP4I between 1st January 2015 and 31st December 2020. Propensity score matching (1:1 ratio) between SGLT2I and DPP4I users was performed on demographics, past co-morbidities, number of prior hospitalizations, duration from T2DM diagnosis to intial drug exposure, non-SGLT2I/DPP4I medications (including other anti-diabetes drugs), abbreviated modification of diet in renal disease, HbA1c, fasting glucose, and their time-weighted means. Sensitivity analysis using a one-year lag time and competing risk analyses using cause-specific and sub-distribution hazard models were conducted.\\nResults: This study cohort included 26 165 SGLT2I and 42 796 DPP4I users (total: N=68 961 patients; 56.43% males, median age: 62.0 years old (standard deviation (SD): 12.8)). Over a median follow-up of 5.56 years (IQR: 5.24-5.80) and after propensity score matching (SGLT2I: N=26 165; DPP4I: N=26 165), SGLT2I users had lower incidences of cataract (4.54% vs. 6.64%%, standardised mean difference [SMD]=0.09) and diabetic retinopathy (3.65 vs. 6.19, SMD=0.12) compared to DPP4I users. SGLT2I use was associated with lower risks of new onset cataract (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: [0.62-0.72] P<0.0001) and diabetic retinopathy (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.53-0.62], P<0.0001). These associations remained significant on multivariable Cox regression ;cataract: HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.64-0.75 (P<0.0001); diabetic retinopathy: HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.63-0.75 (P<0.0001).\\nConclusions: Amongst T2DM patients in Hong Kong, SGLT2I use was associated with lower risks of new onset cataract or diabetic retinopathy compared to DPP4I use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.25.24304828\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.25.24304828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:2 型糖尿病(T2DM)是一种发病率极高的疾病,具有多系统并发症。我们旨在比较两种常见的降糖药物:钠葡萄糖协同转运体2抑制剂(SGLT2I)和二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP4I)对香港T2DM患者糖尿病视网膜病变和白内障发病率的影响:2015年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间接受SGLT2I或DPP4I治疗的T2DM患者的回顾性人群队列研究。对 SGLT2I 和 DPP4I 使用者的人口统计学特征、既往合并疾病、既往住院次数、从 T2DM 诊断到首次接触药物的持续时间、非 SGLT2I/DPP4I 药物(包括其他抗糖尿病药物)、肾病饮食简易调整、HbA1c、空腹血糖及其时间加权平均值进行倾向评分匹配(1:1 比例)。使用一年滞后时间进行了敏感性分析,并使用特定病因和亚分布危险模型进行了竞争风险分析:该研究队列包括 26 165 名 SGLT2I 和 42 796 名 DPP4I 用户(总人数:68 961 名患者;56.43% 为男性,中位年龄:62.0 岁(标准差(SD):12.8))。在中位随访 5.56 年(IQR:5.24-5.80)和倾向得分匹配后(SGLT2I:N=26 165;DPP4I:N=26 165),与 DPP4I 使用者相比,SGLT2I 使用者的白内障(4.54% vs. 6.64%%,标准化平均差 [SMD]=0.09 )和糖尿病视网膜病变(3.65 vs. 6.19,SMD=0.12)发病率较低。使用 SGLT2I 可降低新发白内障(HR:0.67,95% CI:[0.62-0.72] P<0.0001)和糖尿病视网膜病变(危险比 [HR]:0.57,95% 置信区间:[0.62-0.72] P<0.0001)的风险:0.57,95% 置信区间 [CI]:[0.53-0.62],P<0.0001)。白内障:HR:0.69,95% CI:0.64-0.75 (P<0.0001);糖尿病视网膜病变:HR:0.68,95% CI:0.63-0.75 (P<0.0001):结论:在香港的 T2DM 患者中,与使用 DPP4I 相比,使用 SGLT2I 可降低新发白内障或糖尿病视网膜病变的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lower Risk of Incident Cataracts and Diabetic Retinopathy amongst Individuals Treated with Sodium Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor Compared to Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Background/Aims: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an extremely prevalent disease with multisystem complications. We aim to compare the effects of two common glucose lowering medications; sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2I) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4I), on the incidence of diabetic retinopathy and cataracts in T2DM patients in Hong Kong. Methods: Retrospective population-based cohort study of T2DM patients treated with SGLT2I or DPP4I between 1st January 2015 and 31st December 2020. Propensity score matching (1:1 ratio) between SGLT2I and DPP4I users was performed on demographics, past co-morbidities, number of prior hospitalizations, duration from T2DM diagnosis to intial drug exposure, non-SGLT2I/DPP4I medications (including other anti-diabetes drugs), abbreviated modification of diet in renal disease, HbA1c, fasting glucose, and their time-weighted means. Sensitivity analysis using a one-year lag time and competing risk analyses using cause-specific and sub-distribution hazard models were conducted. Results: This study cohort included 26 165 SGLT2I and 42 796 DPP4I users (total: N=68 961 patients; 56.43% males, median age: 62.0 years old (standard deviation (SD): 12.8)). Over a median follow-up of 5.56 years (IQR: 5.24-5.80) and after propensity score matching (SGLT2I: N=26 165; DPP4I: N=26 165), SGLT2I users had lower incidences of cataract (4.54% vs. 6.64%%, standardised mean difference [SMD]=0.09) and diabetic retinopathy (3.65 vs. 6.19, SMD=0.12) compared to DPP4I users. SGLT2I use was associated with lower risks of new onset cataract (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: [0.62-0.72] P<0.0001) and diabetic retinopathy (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.53-0.62], P<0.0001). These associations remained significant on multivariable Cox regression ;cataract: HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.64-0.75 (P<0.0001); diabetic retinopathy: HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.63-0.75 (P<0.0001). Conclusions: Amongst T2DM patients in Hong Kong, SGLT2I use was associated with lower risks of new onset cataract or diabetic retinopathy compared to DPP4I use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信