灾难性脑损伤后癫痫的临床发现、成像特征和预后

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Eugen Trinka, François Dubeau, Frederick Andermann, Alexandre Bastos, Andrew Hui, Li Min Li, Stefan Köhler, André Olivier
{"title":"灾难性脑损伤后癫痫的临床发现、成像特征和预后","authors":"Eugen Trinka, François Dubeau, Frederick Andermann, Alexandre Bastos, Andrew Hui, Li Min Li, Stefan Köhler, André Olivier","doi":"10.1684/j.1950-6945.2000.tb00375.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives The aim of this study is to characterize the clinical features and prognostic factors for intractable, post‐encephalitic epilepsy. Methods We studied retrospectively 42 patients (26 men) evaluated between 1982 and 1999. MRI, neuropsychological findings, interictal and ictal scalp EEG were reviewed for all patients. Fifteen patients had additional stereo EEG (SEEG) studies. Results The mean age at encephalitis was 17 years (SD = 15.5); etiology was identified in 18 patients. During the acute illness, 79% had status epilepticus (SE) or recurrent seizures and 76% were in coma; mean Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) was 3.6 (SD = 0.8). The mean latency to seizure onset was 0.8 years (SD = 1.9). The majority (72%) presented with complex partial seizures with or without secondary generalization. According to interictal epileptiform findings and the predominant seizure onset pattern as found on scalp EEG, patients were unilateral temporal (UTLE) = 8, bilateral temporal (BTLE) = 12, and extratemporal/multifocal or generalized (ETMFE) = 22 patients. MRI atrophy and/or signal changes were unilateral temporal in 7 (18%), bilateral temporal in 5 (13%), multilobar/diffuse in 20 (51%), and absent in 7 (18%). ANOVA revealed significant differences in mean GOS between UTLE versus BTLE and ETMFE (4.7 <jats:italic>versus</jats:italic> 3.2 <jats:italic>versus</jats:italic> 3.6; p &lt; 0.0001), but not in age at encephalitis. Latency to the first unprovoked seizure was shorter in patients with ETMFE compared to UTLE and BTLE (p &lt; 0.01). Surgery was performed in 24 patients. The best outcome was obtained in UTLE (7/8 class I and II). In the others, outcome was poor in the majority (13/16 class III and IV). Conclusion There is a small subgroup of patients with postencephalitic UTLE for whom the outcome is favorable. The majority of our patients had multifocal seizure onset with BTLE and ETMFE, and poor outcome after surgical treatment.","PeriodicalId":50508,"journal":{"name":"Epileptic Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical findings, imaging characteristics and outcome in catastrophic post‐encephalitic epilepsy\",\"authors\":\"Eugen Trinka, François Dubeau, Frederick Andermann, Alexandre Bastos, Andrew Hui, Li Min Li, Stefan Köhler, André Olivier\",\"doi\":\"10.1684/j.1950-6945.2000.tb00375.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives The aim of this study is to characterize the clinical features and prognostic factors for intractable, post‐encephalitic epilepsy. Methods We studied retrospectively 42 patients (26 men) evaluated between 1982 and 1999. MRI, neuropsychological findings, interictal and ictal scalp EEG were reviewed for all patients. Fifteen patients had additional stereo EEG (SEEG) studies. Results The mean age at encephalitis was 17 years (SD = 15.5); etiology was identified in 18 patients. During the acute illness, 79% had status epilepticus (SE) or recurrent seizures and 76% were in coma; mean Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) was 3.6 (SD = 0.8). The mean latency to seizure onset was 0.8 years (SD = 1.9). The majority (72%) presented with complex partial seizures with or without secondary generalization. According to interictal epileptiform findings and the predominant seizure onset pattern as found on scalp EEG, patients were unilateral temporal (UTLE) = 8, bilateral temporal (BTLE) = 12, and extratemporal/multifocal or generalized (ETMFE) = 22 patients. MRI atrophy and/or signal changes were unilateral temporal in 7 (18%), bilateral temporal in 5 (13%), multilobar/diffuse in 20 (51%), and absent in 7 (18%). ANOVA revealed significant differences in mean GOS between UTLE versus BTLE and ETMFE (4.7 <jats:italic>versus</jats:italic> 3.2 <jats:italic>versus</jats:italic> 3.6; p &lt; 0.0001), but not in age at encephalitis. Latency to the first unprovoked seizure was shorter in patients with ETMFE compared to UTLE and BTLE (p &lt; 0.01). Surgery was performed in 24 patients. The best outcome was obtained in UTLE (7/8 class I and II). In the others, outcome was poor in the majority (13/16 class III and IV). Conclusion There is a small subgroup of patients with postencephalitic UTLE for whom the outcome is favorable. The majority of our patients had multifocal seizure onset with BTLE and ETMFE, and poor outcome after surgical treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epileptic Disorders\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epileptic Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1684/j.1950-6945.2000.tb00375.x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epileptic Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/j.1950-6945.2000.tb00375.x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究旨在了解顽固性脑病后癫痫的临床特征和预后因素。方法 我们对 1982 年至 1999 年间接受评估的 42 名患者(26 名男性)进行了回顾性研究。对所有患者的核磁共振成像、神经心理学检查结果、发作间期和发作期头皮脑电图进行了复查。15名患者接受了额外的立体脑电图(SEEG)检查。结果 患脑炎时的平均年龄为 17 岁(SD = 15.5);18 名患者的病因已查明。在急性期,79%的患者出现癫痫状态(SE)或反复发作,76%的患者处于昏迷状态;格拉斯哥结果量表(GOS)的平均值为3.6(SD = 0.8)。癫痫发作的平均潜伏期为 0.8 年(SD = 1.9)。大多数患者(72%)表现为伴有或不伴有继发性全身症状的复杂部分性发作。根据发作间期痫样发现和头皮脑电图发现的主要发作起始模式,患者分为单侧颞部(UTLE)=8例、双侧颞部(BTLE)=12例、颞外/多灶或泛发性(UTMFE)=22例。MRI 萎缩和/或信号变化为单侧颞部 7 例(18%),双侧颞部 5 例(13%),多叶/弥漫 20 例(51%),缺失 7 例(18%)。方差分析显示,UTLE 与 BTLE 和 ETMFE 之间的平均 GOS 存在显著差异(4.7 与 3.2 与 3.6;p <;0.0001),但脑炎发生时的年龄无显著差异。与UTLE和BTLE相比,UTMFE患者首次无诱因癫痫发作的潜伏期更短(p <0.01)。24 名患者接受了手术治疗。UTLE患者的疗效最好(7/8例为I级和II级)。在其他患者中,大多数(13/16 例 III 级和 IV 级)疗效不佳。结论 有一小部分脑后UTLE患者的预后良好。我们的大多数患者都有多灶性癫痫发作,伴有BTLE和UTMFE,手术治疗后疗效不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical findings, imaging characteristics and outcome in catastrophic post‐encephalitic epilepsy
Objectives The aim of this study is to characterize the clinical features and prognostic factors for intractable, post‐encephalitic epilepsy. Methods We studied retrospectively 42 patients (26 men) evaluated between 1982 and 1999. MRI, neuropsychological findings, interictal and ictal scalp EEG were reviewed for all patients. Fifteen patients had additional stereo EEG (SEEG) studies. Results The mean age at encephalitis was 17 years (SD = 15.5); etiology was identified in 18 patients. During the acute illness, 79% had status epilepticus (SE) or recurrent seizures and 76% were in coma; mean Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) was 3.6 (SD = 0.8). The mean latency to seizure onset was 0.8 years (SD = 1.9). The majority (72%) presented with complex partial seizures with or without secondary generalization. According to interictal epileptiform findings and the predominant seizure onset pattern as found on scalp EEG, patients were unilateral temporal (UTLE) = 8, bilateral temporal (BTLE) = 12, and extratemporal/multifocal or generalized (ETMFE) = 22 patients. MRI atrophy and/or signal changes were unilateral temporal in 7 (18%), bilateral temporal in 5 (13%), multilobar/diffuse in 20 (51%), and absent in 7 (18%). ANOVA revealed significant differences in mean GOS between UTLE versus BTLE and ETMFE (4.7 versus 3.2 versus 3.6; p < 0.0001), but not in age at encephalitis. Latency to the first unprovoked seizure was shorter in patients with ETMFE compared to UTLE and BTLE (p < 0.01). Surgery was performed in 24 patients. The best outcome was obtained in UTLE (7/8 class I and II). In the others, outcome was poor in the majority (13/16 class III and IV). Conclusion There is a small subgroup of patients with postencephalitic UTLE for whom the outcome is favorable. The majority of our patients had multifocal seizure onset with BTLE and ETMFE, and poor outcome after surgical treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epileptic Disorders
Epileptic Disorders 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
138
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epileptic Disorders is the leading forum where all experts and medical studentswho wish to improve their understanding of epilepsy and related disorders can share practical experiences surrounding diagnosis and care, natural history, and management of seizures. Epileptic Disorders is the official E-journal of the International League Against Epilepsy for educational communication. As the journal celebrates its 20th anniversary, it will now be available only as an online version. Its mission is to create educational links between epileptologists and other health professionals in clinical practice and scientists or physicians in research-based institutions. This change is accompanied by an increase in the number of issues per year, from 4 to 6, to ensure regular diffusion of recently published material (high quality Review and Seminar in Epileptology papers; Original Research articles or Case reports of educational value; MultiMedia Teaching Material), to serve the global medical community that cares for those affected by epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信