癌症幸存者和护理伙伴关于 COVID-19 大流行期间压力和社会支持资源的录音日记。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Kristin G. Cloyes , Kelly J. Mansfield , Sarah E. Wawrzynski , Marilisa Vega , Jacqueline Kent-Marvick , Jia-Wen Guo
{"title":"癌症幸存者和护理伙伴关于 COVID-19 大流行期间压力和社会支持资源的录音日记。","authors":"Kristin G. Cloyes ,&nbsp;Kelly J. Mansfield ,&nbsp;Sarah E. Wawrzynski ,&nbsp;Marilisa Vega ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Kent-Marvick ,&nbsp;Jia-Wen Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To describe cancer survivors’ and care partners’ perceived stress and social support during the COVID-19 pandemic and assess the feasibility of audio diaries for assessing role-related needs and resources.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants (N = 51; n = 28 survivors, n = 23 care partners) recorded three monthly audio diaries reporting stress and support experiences. Diaries were transcribed and content-analyzed using a hybrid approach. Stress-related content was inductively coded, and social support content was deductively coded by type (instrumental, information, emotional, companionship, appraisal; κ = 0.75) then inductively coded. Descriptive statistics summarized sociodemographic data and compared coding frequencies by role. We developed narrative summaries of stress and support categories and selected quotes for contextual detail.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Cancer-related stressors were most prevalent (28.8%), followed by work (26.8%), family (23.1%), social isolation (13.4%), and finances (8.0%). While no significant difference in reporting frequency was observed between roles, cancer-related stress was more prevalent for survivors while work-related stress was mentioned more by care partners. Emotional support was the most prevalent support type (32.1%), followed by companionship (25.3%), appraisal (17.9%), instrumental (16.67%), and informational support (8%). Survivors reported more appraisal support than care partners (χ<sup>2</sup> = 6.48, <em>df</em> = 1, P = .011) and more support for self-care, while care partners expressed more other-oriented concerns and focused more on managing responsibilities and interactions outside the household.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The pandemic complicated and intensified role-based stressors already present in the survivorship context. Our findings highlight the importance of informal social support networks, particularly when access to formal services is limited, and suggest that audio diaries can be an effective tool for assessing support needs and resources.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for Nursing Practice</h3><p>Nurses and healthcare providers should tailor social support assessments to address the distinct support needs and individual resources of cancer survivors and their care partners. This is especially critical in contexts that limit access to care and formal services.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54253,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cancer Survivors’ and Care Partners’ Audio Diaries on Stress and Social Support Resources During the COVID-19 Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Kristin G. Cloyes ,&nbsp;Kelly J. Mansfield ,&nbsp;Sarah E. Wawrzynski ,&nbsp;Marilisa Vega ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Kent-Marvick ,&nbsp;Jia-Wen Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To describe cancer survivors’ and care partners’ perceived stress and social support during the COVID-19 pandemic and assess the feasibility of audio diaries for assessing role-related needs and resources.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants (N = 51; n = 28 survivors, n = 23 care partners) recorded three monthly audio diaries reporting stress and support experiences. Diaries were transcribed and content-analyzed using a hybrid approach. Stress-related content was inductively coded, and social support content was deductively coded by type (instrumental, information, emotional, companionship, appraisal; κ = 0.75) then inductively coded. Descriptive statistics summarized sociodemographic data and compared coding frequencies by role. We developed narrative summaries of stress and support categories and selected quotes for contextual detail.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Cancer-related stressors were most prevalent (28.8%), followed by work (26.8%), family (23.1%), social isolation (13.4%), and finances (8.0%). While no significant difference in reporting frequency was observed between roles, cancer-related stress was more prevalent for survivors while work-related stress was mentioned more by care partners. Emotional support was the most prevalent support type (32.1%), followed by companionship (25.3%), appraisal (17.9%), instrumental (16.67%), and informational support (8%). Survivors reported more appraisal support than care partners (χ<sup>2</sup> = 6.48, <em>df</em> = 1, P = .011) and more support for self-care, while care partners expressed more other-oriented concerns and focused more on managing responsibilities and interactions outside the household.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The pandemic complicated and intensified role-based stressors already present in the survivorship context. Our findings highlight the importance of informal social support networks, particularly when access to formal services is limited, and suggest that audio diaries can be an effective tool for assessing support needs and resources.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for Nursing Practice</h3><p>Nurses and healthcare providers should tailor social support assessments to address the distinct support needs and individual resources of cancer survivors and their care partners. This is especially critical in contexts that limit access to care and formal services.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Oncology Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Oncology Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749208124000627\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749208124000627","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的描述癌症幸存者和护理伙伴在 COVID-19 大流行期间感知到的压力和社会支持,并评估音频日记在评估角色相关需求和资源方面的可行性:参与者(N = 51;n = 28 名幸存者,n = 23 名护理伙伴)录制了三份每月语音日记,报告压力和支持体验。采用混合方法对日记进行转录和内容分析。与压力相关的内容进行归纳编码,社会支持内容按类型(工具、信息、情感、陪伴、评价;κ = 0.75)进行演绎编码,然后进行归纳编码。描述性统计汇总了社会人口学数据,并比较了不同角色的编码频率。我们编写了压力和支持类别的叙述性摘要,并选取了一些引文来说明背景细节:癌症相关压力最普遍(28.8%),其次是工作(26.8%)、家庭(23.1%)、社会孤立(13.4%)和经济(8.0%)。虽然不同角色间的报告频率没有明显差异,但幸存者更多提及与癌症相关的压力,而护理伙伴则更多提及与工作相关的压力。情感支持是最普遍的支持类型(32.1%),其次是陪伴(25.3%)、评估(17.9%)、工具性支持(16.67%)和信息支持(8%)。幸存者比护理伙伴报告了更多的评价支持(χ2 = 6.48, df = 1, P = .011)和更多的自我护理支持,而护理伙伴则表达了更多以他人为导向的关注,并更注重管理家庭以外的责任和互动:大流行病使幸存者本已存在的基于角色的压力变得更加复杂和强烈。我们的研究结果强调了非正式社会支持网络的重要性,尤其是在获得正式服务的途径有限的情况下,并表明录音日记可以成为评估支持需求和资源的有效工具:护士和医疗服务提供者应针对癌症幸存者及其护理伙伴的不同支持需求和个人资源,量身定制社会支持评估。在获得护理和正规服务受到限制的情况下,这一点尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cancer Survivors’ and Care Partners’ Audio Diaries on Stress and Social Support Resources During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Objectives

To describe cancer survivors’ and care partners’ perceived stress and social support during the COVID-19 pandemic and assess the feasibility of audio diaries for assessing role-related needs and resources.

Methods

Participants (N = 51; n = 28 survivors, n = 23 care partners) recorded three monthly audio diaries reporting stress and support experiences. Diaries were transcribed and content-analyzed using a hybrid approach. Stress-related content was inductively coded, and social support content was deductively coded by type (instrumental, information, emotional, companionship, appraisal; κ = 0.75) then inductively coded. Descriptive statistics summarized sociodemographic data and compared coding frequencies by role. We developed narrative summaries of stress and support categories and selected quotes for contextual detail.

Results

Cancer-related stressors were most prevalent (28.8%), followed by work (26.8%), family (23.1%), social isolation (13.4%), and finances (8.0%). While no significant difference in reporting frequency was observed between roles, cancer-related stress was more prevalent for survivors while work-related stress was mentioned more by care partners. Emotional support was the most prevalent support type (32.1%), followed by companionship (25.3%), appraisal (17.9%), instrumental (16.67%), and informational support (8%). Survivors reported more appraisal support than care partners (χ2 = 6.48, df = 1, P = .011) and more support for self-care, while care partners expressed more other-oriented concerns and focused more on managing responsibilities and interactions outside the household.

Conclusions

The pandemic complicated and intensified role-based stressors already present in the survivorship context. Our findings highlight the importance of informal social support networks, particularly when access to formal services is limited, and suggest that audio diaries can be an effective tool for assessing support needs and resources.

Implications for Nursing Practice

Nurses and healthcare providers should tailor social support assessments to address the distinct support needs and individual resources of cancer survivors and their care partners. This is especially critical in contexts that limit access to care and formal services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Oncology Nursing
Seminars in Oncology Nursing Nursing-Oncology (nursing)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology Nursing is a unique international journal published six times a year. Each issue offers a multi-faceted overview of a single cancer topic from a selection of expert review articles and disseminates oncology nursing research relevant to patient care, nursing education, management, and policy development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信