中国青少年愉快与不愉快情绪的时间不对称性

IF 2.2 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1080/00223980.2024.2330412
Haiping Hao, Qiao Hu, Xi Shen, Yiqiao Hu, Houchao Lyu
{"title":"中国青少年愉快与不愉快情绪的时间不对称性","authors":"Haiping Hao, Qiao Hu, Xi Shen, Yiqiao Hu, Houchao Lyu","doi":"10.1080/00223980.2024.2330412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies have shown that anticipation induces more emotions than retrospection, known as temporal emotion asymmetry. However, the majority of previous studies have been confined to Western contexts. Eastern populations tend to emphasize the past more than their Western counterparts and may exhibit distinct forms of temporal emotion asymmetry. Therefore, we conducted an investigation involving Chinese adolescents. Our research encompassed two experiments, investigating Chinese adolescents' temporal emotion asymmetry from a self-perspective (Experiment 1; <i>N</i> = 124) and an other-perspective (Experiment 2; <i>N</i> = 162). Participants were prompted to retrospect and anticipate events that elicited pleasant or unpleasant feelings. The results revealed that, whether from a self-perspective or an other-perspective, retrospection of past positive events elicited greater pleasure than the anticipation of future positive events. However, concerning adverse events, under a self-perspective, anticipation induced more displeasure than retrospection (Experiment 1); under an other-perspective, retrospection induced more displeasure than anticipation (Experiment 2). Our findings provide some support for the construal level theory, fading affect bias, and mobilization-minimization hypothesis of event cognition. Based on these results, retrospection seems to be a potential means for regulating the emotions of Chinese adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":48218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal Asymmetry of Pleasant and Unpleasant Feelings Among Chinese Adolescents.\",\"authors\":\"Haiping Hao, Qiao Hu, Xi Shen, Yiqiao Hu, Houchao Lyu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00223980.2024.2330412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previous studies have shown that anticipation induces more emotions than retrospection, known as temporal emotion asymmetry. However, the majority of previous studies have been confined to Western contexts. Eastern populations tend to emphasize the past more than their Western counterparts and may exhibit distinct forms of temporal emotion asymmetry. Therefore, we conducted an investigation involving Chinese adolescents. Our research encompassed two experiments, investigating Chinese adolescents' temporal emotion asymmetry from a self-perspective (Experiment 1; <i>N</i> = 124) and an other-perspective (Experiment 2; <i>N</i> = 162). Participants were prompted to retrospect and anticipate events that elicited pleasant or unpleasant feelings. The results revealed that, whether from a self-perspective or an other-perspective, retrospection of past positive events elicited greater pleasure than the anticipation of future positive events. However, concerning adverse events, under a self-perspective, anticipation induced more displeasure than retrospection (Experiment 1); under an other-perspective, retrospection induced more displeasure than anticipation (Experiment 2). Our findings provide some support for the construal level theory, fading affect bias, and mobilization-minimization hypothesis of event cognition. Based on these results, retrospection seems to be a potential means for regulating the emotions of Chinese adolescents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2024.2330412\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2024.2330412","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往的研究表明,预期比回顾能诱发更多的情绪,这就是所谓的时间情绪不对称(temporal emotion asymmetry)。然而,以往的研究大多局限于西方背景。东方人往往比西方人更重视过去,可能会表现出不同形式的时间情绪不对称。因此,我们进行了一项涉及中国青少年的调查。我们的研究包括两个实验,分别从自我视角(实验 1; N = 124)和他人视角(实验 2; N = 162)调查中国青少年的时间情绪不对称。被试被要求回顾和预测引起愉快或不愉快情绪的事件。结果表明,无论是从自我视角还是从他人视角,回顾过去的积极事件比预测未来的积极事件更能引起愉悦感。然而,对于不利事件,在自我视角下,预期比回顾更能引起不快(实验 1);在他人视角下,回顾比预期更能引起不快(实验 2)。我们的研究结果为事件认知的构想水平理论、情感消退偏差和动员-最小化假说提供了一些支持。基于这些结果,回溯似乎是调节中国青少年情绪的一种潜在手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Temporal Asymmetry of Pleasant and Unpleasant Feelings Among Chinese Adolescents.

Previous studies have shown that anticipation induces more emotions than retrospection, known as temporal emotion asymmetry. However, the majority of previous studies have been confined to Western contexts. Eastern populations tend to emphasize the past more than their Western counterparts and may exhibit distinct forms of temporal emotion asymmetry. Therefore, we conducted an investigation involving Chinese adolescents. Our research encompassed two experiments, investigating Chinese adolescents' temporal emotion asymmetry from a self-perspective (Experiment 1; N = 124) and an other-perspective (Experiment 2; N = 162). Participants were prompted to retrospect and anticipate events that elicited pleasant or unpleasant feelings. The results revealed that, whether from a self-perspective or an other-perspective, retrospection of past positive events elicited greater pleasure than the anticipation of future positive events. However, concerning adverse events, under a self-perspective, anticipation induced more displeasure than retrospection (Experiment 1); under an other-perspective, retrospection induced more displeasure than anticipation (Experiment 2). Our findings provide some support for the construal level theory, fading affect bias, and mobilization-minimization hypothesis of event cognition. Based on these results, retrospection seems to be a potential means for regulating the emotions of Chinese adolescents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Psychology
Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychology is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes empirical research and theoretical articles in applied areas of psychology, including: Behavioral Psychology Clinical Psychology Cognitive Psychology Counseling Psychology Cultural Psychology Economic Psychology Educational Psychology Environmental Psychology Ethics in Psychology Family Psychology and Couples Psychology Forensic Psychology Health Psychology Industrial and Personnel Psychology Managerial and Leadership Psychology Measurement/Assessment Professional Practice Psychology of Religion Psychotherapy School Psychology Social Psychology Sport Psychology Work, Industrial and Organizational Psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信