患者对活动性溃疡性结肠炎治疗和粪便微生物群移植的偏好。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-03-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20406223241239168
Deborah A Marshall, Karen V MacDonald, Dina Kao, Charles N Bernstein, Gilaad G Kaplan, Humberto Jijon, Glen Hazlewood, Remo Panaccione, Yasmin Nasser, Maitreyi Raman, Paul Moayyedi
{"title":"患者对活动性溃疡性结肠炎治疗和粪便微生物群移植的偏好。","authors":"Deborah A Marshall, Karen V MacDonald, Dina Kao, Charles N Bernstein, Gilaad G Kaplan, Humberto Jijon, Glen Hazlewood, Remo Panaccione, Yasmin Nasser, Maitreyi Raman, Paul Moayyedi","doi":"10.1177/20406223241239168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a promising treatment for active ulcerative colitis (UC). Understanding patient preferences can identify treatment features that may impact treatment decisions, improve shared decision-making, and contribute to patient-centered care, which is especially important in the context of novel treatments like FMT.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to quantify preferences for active UC treatments, specifically FMT and biologics, and identify patient characteristics associated with different preference patterns.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a cross-sectional survey study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered a discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey to elicit preferences in a sample of Canadian adults with UC. DCE data were analyzed using a main-effects mixed logit model and used to predict uptake of hypothetical scenarios reflecting alternative combinations of treatment features. Latent class modeling identified heterogeneity in patient preference patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants' (<i>n</i> = 201) mean age was 47.1 years (SD: 14.5 years), 58% were female, and most (84%) had at least some post-secondary education. Almost half were willing to undergo FMT. When considering treatments for active UC, the most important attributes were chance of remission and severity of rare unknown side effects. All else equal, participants were most likely to uptake treatment that involves oral capsules/pills. Participants in the class with the highest utility for chance of remission were younger, had more severe disease, and 58% indicated that they would be willing to undergo FMT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified characteristics of UC patients who are more likely to be interested in FMT using preference elicitation methods. Patient-centered care can be enhanced by knowing which patients are more likely to be interested in FMT, potentially improving satisfaction with and adherence to treatments for active UC to maximize the effectiveness of treatment while considering heterogeneity in patient preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10966996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient preferences for active ulcerative colitis treatments and fecal microbiota transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"Deborah A Marshall, Karen V MacDonald, Dina Kao, Charles N Bernstein, Gilaad G Kaplan, Humberto Jijon, Glen Hazlewood, Remo Panaccione, Yasmin Nasser, Maitreyi Raman, Paul Moayyedi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20406223241239168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a promising treatment for active ulcerative colitis (UC). Understanding patient preferences can identify treatment features that may impact treatment decisions, improve shared decision-making, and contribute to patient-centered care, which is especially important in the context of novel treatments like FMT.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to quantify preferences for active UC treatments, specifically FMT and biologics, and identify patient characteristics associated with different preference patterns.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a cross-sectional survey study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered a discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey to elicit preferences in a sample of Canadian adults with UC. DCE data were analyzed using a main-effects mixed logit model and used to predict uptake of hypothetical scenarios reflecting alternative combinations of treatment features. Latent class modeling identified heterogeneity in patient preference patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants' (<i>n</i> = 201) mean age was 47.1 years (SD: 14.5 years), 58% were female, and most (84%) had at least some post-secondary education. Almost half were willing to undergo FMT. When considering treatments for active UC, the most important attributes were chance of remission and severity of rare unknown side effects. All else equal, participants were most likely to uptake treatment that involves oral capsules/pills. Participants in the class with the highest utility for chance of remission were younger, had more severe disease, and 58% indicated that they would be willing to undergo FMT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified characteristics of UC patients who are more likely to be interested in FMT using preference elicitation methods. Patient-centered care can be enhanced by knowing which patients are more likely to be interested in FMT, potentially improving satisfaction with and adherence to treatments for active UC to maximize the effectiveness of treatment while considering heterogeneity in patient preferences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10966996/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20406223241239168\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20406223241239168","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:粪便微生物群移植(FMT)是治疗活动性溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的一种很有前景的方法。了解患者的偏好可以确定可能影响治疗决策的治疗特点,改善共同决策,并促进以患者为中心的护理,这对于 FMT 等新型疗法尤为重要:我们旨在量化患者对积极的 UC 治疗(尤其是 FMT 和生物制剂)的偏好,并识别与不同偏好模式相关的患者特征:这是一项横断面调查研究:我们对加拿大成年 UC 患者进行了离散选择实验(DCE)调查,以了解他们的偏好。我们使用主效应混合对数模型对离散选择实验数据进行了分析,并用它来预测对反映治疗特征替代组合的假设情景的接受程度。潜类模型确定了患者偏好模式的异质性:参与者(n = 201)的平均年龄为 47.1 岁(SD:14.5 岁),58% 为女性,大多数(84%)至少受过高等教育。近一半的人愿意接受 FMT 治疗。在考虑活动性 UC 的治疗方法时,最重要的因素是缓解的几率和罕见未知副作用的严重程度。在其他条件相同的情况下,参与者最有可能接受口服胶囊/药片的治疗。对病情缓解几率效用最高的那一类参与者更年轻,病情更严重,58%的人表示愿意接受FMT治疗:结论:我们利用偏好激发方法确定了更有可能对 FMT 感兴趣的 UC 患者的特征。通过了解哪些患者更有可能对 FMT 感兴趣,可以加强以患者为中心的护理,从而有可能提高活动性 UC 治疗的满意度和依从性,在考虑患者偏好异质性的同时最大限度地提高治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient preferences for active ulcerative colitis treatments and fecal microbiota transplantation.

Background: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a promising treatment for active ulcerative colitis (UC). Understanding patient preferences can identify treatment features that may impact treatment decisions, improve shared decision-making, and contribute to patient-centered care, which is especially important in the context of novel treatments like FMT.

Objectives: We aimed to quantify preferences for active UC treatments, specifically FMT and biologics, and identify patient characteristics associated with different preference patterns.

Design: This is a cross-sectional survey study.

Methods: We administered a discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey to elicit preferences in a sample of Canadian adults with UC. DCE data were analyzed using a main-effects mixed logit model and used to predict uptake of hypothetical scenarios reflecting alternative combinations of treatment features. Latent class modeling identified heterogeneity in patient preference patterns.

Results: Participants' (n = 201) mean age was 47.1 years (SD: 14.5 years), 58% were female, and most (84%) had at least some post-secondary education. Almost half were willing to undergo FMT. When considering treatments for active UC, the most important attributes were chance of remission and severity of rare unknown side effects. All else equal, participants were most likely to uptake treatment that involves oral capsules/pills. Participants in the class with the highest utility for chance of remission were younger, had more severe disease, and 58% indicated that they would be willing to undergo FMT.

Conclusion: We identified characteristics of UC patients who are more likely to be interested in FMT using preference elicitation methods. Patient-centered care can be enhanced by knowing which patients are more likely to be interested in FMT, potentially improving satisfaction with and adherence to treatments for active UC to maximize the effectiveness of treatment while considering heterogeneity in patient preferences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信