失败的回肠肛门袋转流:挽救回肠肛门袋的第一步?

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Tairin Uchino, Eddy P Lincango, Oscar Hernandez Dominguez, Anuradha Bhama, Emre Gorgun, Arielle Kanters, Hermann Kessler, Jeremy Lipman, David Liska, Joshua Sommovilla, Michael Valente, Scott R Steele, Tracy Hull, Stefan D Holubar
{"title":"失败的回肠肛门袋转流:挽救回肠肛门袋的第一步?","authors":"Tairin Uchino, Eddy P Lincango, Oscar Hernandez Dominguez, Anuradha Bhama, Emre Gorgun, Arielle Kanters, Hermann Kessler, Jeremy Lipman, David Liska, Joshua Sommovilla, Michael Valente, Scott R Steele, Tracy Hull, Stefan D Holubar","doi":"10.1093/ibd/izae061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is a technically demanding procedure with many potential complications. Rediversion with an ileostomy is often the first step in pouch salvage; however, it may not be clear if an individual patient will undergo subsequent pouch salvage surgery. We aimed to describe the indications and short- and long-term outcomes of rediversion in our pouch registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried our institutional pouch registry for patients who underwent index 2- or 3-stage IPAA and subsequent rediversion at our institution between 1985 and 2022. Pouches constructed elsewhere, rediverted elsewhere, or those patients who underwent pouch salvage/excision without prior rediversion were excluded. Patients were selected for pouch salvage according to the surgeon's discretion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 177 patients (3.4% of 5207 index pouches) were rediverted. At index pouch, median patient age was 32 years and 50.8% were women. Diagnoses included ulcerative colitis (86.4%), indeterminate colitis (6.2%), familial adenomatous polyposis (4.0%), and others (3.4%). Median time from prior ileostomy closure to rediversion was 7.2 years. Indications for rediversion were inflammatory in 98 (55.4%) and noninflammatory in 79 (44.6%) patients. After rediversion, 52% underwent pouch salvage, 30% had no further surgery, and 18.1% underwent pouch excision. The 5-year pouch survival rates for inflammatory and noninflammatory indications were 71.5% and 94.5%, respectively (P = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rediversion of ileoanal pouches is a safe initial strategy to manage failing pouches and is a useful first step in pouch salvage in many patients. Subsequent salvage surgery for noninflammatory indications had a significantly higher pouch salvage rate than those rediverted for inflammatory complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":13623,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"105-112"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rediversion of the Failing Ileoanal Pouch: First Step in Pouch Salvage?\",\"authors\":\"Tairin Uchino, Eddy P Lincango, Oscar Hernandez Dominguez, Anuradha Bhama, Emre Gorgun, Arielle Kanters, Hermann Kessler, Jeremy Lipman, David Liska, Joshua Sommovilla, Michael Valente, Scott R Steele, Tracy Hull, Stefan D Holubar\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ibd/izae061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is a technically demanding procedure with many potential complications. Rediversion with an ileostomy is often the first step in pouch salvage; however, it may not be clear if an individual patient will undergo subsequent pouch salvage surgery. We aimed to describe the indications and short- and long-term outcomes of rediversion in our pouch registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried our institutional pouch registry for patients who underwent index 2- or 3-stage IPAA and subsequent rediversion at our institution between 1985 and 2022. Pouches constructed elsewhere, rediverted elsewhere, or those patients who underwent pouch salvage/excision without prior rediversion were excluded. Patients were selected for pouch salvage according to the surgeon's discretion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 177 patients (3.4% of 5207 index pouches) were rediverted. At index pouch, median patient age was 32 years and 50.8% were women. Diagnoses included ulcerative colitis (86.4%), indeterminate colitis (6.2%), familial adenomatous polyposis (4.0%), and others (3.4%). Median time from prior ileostomy closure to rediversion was 7.2 years. Indications for rediversion were inflammatory in 98 (55.4%) and noninflammatory in 79 (44.6%) patients. After rediversion, 52% underwent pouch salvage, 30% had no further surgery, and 18.1% underwent pouch excision. The 5-year pouch survival rates for inflammatory and noninflammatory indications were 71.5% and 94.5%, respectively (P = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rediversion of ileoanal pouches is a safe initial strategy to manage failing pouches and is a useful first step in pouch salvage in many patients. Subsequent salvage surgery for noninflammatory indications had a significantly higher pouch salvage rate than those rediverted for inflammatory complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"105-112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izae061\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izae061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:回肠袋-肛门吻合术是一项技术要求很高的手术,有许多潜在的并发症。用回肠造口术进行再转流通常是挽救肠袋的第一步;然而,患者是否会接受后续的肠袋挽救手术可能并不明确。我们的目的是在我们的胃袋登记处描述胃袋转流的适应症以及短期和长期结果:我们查询了本机构的胃袋登记册,以了解 1985 年至 2022 年期间在本机构接受指数 2 或 3 期 IPAA 和后续再转流手术的患者。不包括在其他地方修建的肛门袋、在其他地方重新转流的肛门袋,也不包括接受肛门袋挽救/切除术但未事先进行重新转流的患者。根据外科医生的判断选择患者进行胃袋挽救:共有 177 名患者(占 5207 个索引胃袋的 3.4%)接受了胃袋再转流手术。患者年龄中位数为 32 岁,50.8% 为女性。诊断结果包括溃疡性结肠炎(86.4%)、不确定结肠炎(6.2%)、家族性腺瘤性息肉病(4.0%)和其他(3.4%)。从之前的回肠造口术关闭到转流的中位时间为 7.2 年。98名患者(55.4%)的转流适应症为炎症,79名患者(44.6%)的转流适应症为非炎症。重新分流后,52% 的患者进行了胃袋挽回手术,30% 的患者没有进行进一步手术,18.1% 的患者进行了胃袋切除手术。炎症性和非炎症性适应症的肠袋5年存活率分别为71.5%和94.5%(P = .02):结论:转流回肠肛门括约肌是处理衰竭肛门括约肌的安全初始策略,也是许多患者肛门括约肌挽救的第一步。与因炎症并发症而重新转流的患者相比,因非炎症适应症而进行的后续挽救手术的胃袋挽救率要高得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rediversion of the Failing Ileoanal Pouch: First Step in Pouch Salvage?

Background: Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is a technically demanding procedure with many potential complications. Rediversion with an ileostomy is often the first step in pouch salvage; however, it may not be clear if an individual patient will undergo subsequent pouch salvage surgery. We aimed to describe the indications and short- and long-term outcomes of rediversion in our pouch registry.

Methods: We queried our institutional pouch registry for patients who underwent index 2- or 3-stage IPAA and subsequent rediversion at our institution between 1985 and 2022. Pouches constructed elsewhere, rediverted elsewhere, or those patients who underwent pouch salvage/excision without prior rediversion were excluded. Patients were selected for pouch salvage according to the surgeon's discretion.

Results: Overall, 177 patients (3.4% of 5207 index pouches) were rediverted. At index pouch, median patient age was 32 years and 50.8% were women. Diagnoses included ulcerative colitis (86.4%), indeterminate colitis (6.2%), familial adenomatous polyposis (4.0%), and others (3.4%). Median time from prior ileostomy closure to rediversion was 7.2 years. Indications for rediversion were inflammatory in 98 (55.4%) and noninflammatory in 79 (44.6%) patients. After rediversion, 52% underwent pouch salvage, 30% had no further surgery, and 18.1% underwent pouch excision. The 5-year pouch survival rates for inflammatory and noninflammatory indications were 71.5% and 94.5%, respectively (P = .02).

Conclusion: Rediversion of ileoanal pouches is a safe initial strategy to manage failing pouches and is a useful first step in pouch salvage in many patients. Subsequent salvage surgery for noninflammatory indications had a significantly higher pouch salvage rate than those rediverted for inflammatory complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.10%
发文量
462
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases® supports the mission of the Crohn''s & Colitis Foundation by bringing the most impactful and cutting edge clinical topics and research findings related to inflammatory bowel diseases to clinicians and researchers working in IBD and related fields. The Journal is committed to publishing on innovative topics that influence the future of clinical care, treatment, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信