后记:关于早期美国生态哥特式的挖掘

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
Tom J. Hillard
{"title":"后记:关于早期美国生态哥特式的挖掘","authors":"Tom J. Hillard","doi":"10.1353/saf.0.a923009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p>Afterword: On Exhuming an Early American Ecogothic 275 Studies in American Fiction 50.1–2 (2023): 275–285 © 2024 by Johns Hopkins University Press Afterword: On Exhuming an Early American Ecogothic Tom J. Hillard Boise State University “Yet one day the demons of America must be placated, the ghosts must be appeased, the Spirit of Place atoned for. Then the true passionate love for American Soil will appear. As yet, there is too much menace in the landscape.” —D. H. Lawrence, Studies in Classic American Literature (1923)1 I n the early 2000s, back when I was a doctoral student at the University of Arizona, tinkering with ideas that I then thought of as “dark nature” or “gothic nature,” I could scarcely have imagined, twenty years later, the publication of this special issue of Studies in American Fiction. The thought of such a range of scholars, from around the world, contributing their ideas to the flourishing field of the “ecogothic” was beyond anything that I could have dreamed. Back then, ecocriticism itself was still something of an emerging field, and one by no means yet widely embraced by the academy—so in those early explorations of the shadowy corners of ecocriticism and gothic literature, which itself had long been a marginalized area of study, my work then often felt fairly far afield. I relate all this because, as one of the earliest proponents of the mutually entwined study of ecocriticism and the gothic, I’ve observed the field develop with a watchful eye, and thus it is with particular excitement that I greet this current issue, rich as it is with its varied approaches to the ecogothic. The essays herein collectively demonstrate the range and versatility of what ecogothic studies has become, and they show its applicability to a broad swath of literary texts. In Matthew Sivils’s apt words from the introduction to this volume, “Once we start looking, the ecogothic seems to sprout up everywhere.”2 Indeed, in the past half-decade or so in particular, ecogothic scholarship has proliferated, and the 276 Studies in American Fiction ecogothic itself seems to be found everywhere among us. Moreover, nothing suggests that any of this will slow anytime soon. From an academic point of view, I see this as a very good thing. (Though from the point of view of a human being living on this planet, it’s perhaps less comforting to realize one may be living in a gothic tale!) As the field of ecogothic studies has grown—matured, even—the once amorphous definition of “ecogothic” has become clearer and, I think, more refined.As waves of critics continue to fine tune their usage of the term, it seems to be being applied in two primary ways: as a critical approach or way of studying a text, and as a quality of a literary work itself. That is, one can bring an “ecogothic lens” to a text, and at the same time, that text itself can contain ecogothic elements—in terms of plot, setting, theme, and so forth. In his introduction to this issue, Sivils does a remarkable job surveying the evolving usage and meanings of ecogothic, so I needn’t repeat such a history here. Nor do I feel the need to stake any claim about what the term means or ought to mean. Given its proliferation in the past five years alone, it is hard to say what directions ecogothic studies might take in the coming years. Moreover, given my own inability to foresee the current popularity of ecogothic, I won’t pretend to know where the latest generation of scholars will take it (though I do know I will follow its developments with eagerness). So rather than being prognosticator, in this afterword I simply instead offer a few small observations about the field of gothic studies in general, and ecogothic studies in particular, in order to suggest some possible future developments that I think could be useful. In reading the thoughtful introduction to this special issue, I was struck by Sivils’s astute observation about “waves” of ecogothic scholarship. He notes that a “first wave of the ecogothic was about the recognition of the pervasive... </p>","PeriodicalId":42494,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN AMERICAN FICTION","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Afterword: On Exhuming an Early American Ecogothic\",\"authors\":\"Tom J. Hillard\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/saf.0.a923009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p>Afterword: On Exhuming an Early American Ecogothic 275 Studies in American Fiction 50.1–2 (2023): 275–285 © 2024 by Johns Hopkins University Press Afterword: On Exhuming an Early American Ecogothic Tom J. Hillard Boise State University “Yet one day the demons of America must be placated, the ghosts must be appeased, the Spirit of Place atoned for. Then the true passionate love for American Soil will appear. As yet, there is too much menace in the landscape.” —D. H. Lawrence, Studies in Classic American Literature (1923)1 I n the early 2000s, back when I was a doctoral student at the University of Arizona, tinkering with ideas that I then thought of as “dark nature” or “gothic nature,” I could scarcely have imagined, twenty years later, the publication of this special issue of Studies in American Fiction. The thought of such a range of scholars, from around the world, contributing their ideas to the flourishing field of the “ecogothic” was beyond anything that I could have dreamed. Back then, ecocriticism itself was still something of an emerging field, and one by no means yet widely embraced by the academy—so in those early explorations of the shadowy corners of ecocriticism and gothic literature, which itself had long been a marginalized area of study, my work then often felt fairly far afield. I relate all this because, as one of the earliest proponents of the mutually entwined study of ecocriticism and the gothic, I’ve observed the field develop with a watchful eye, and thus it is with particular excitement that I greet this current issue, rich as it is with its varied approaches to the ecogothic. The essays herein collectively demonstrate the range and versatility of what ecogothic studies has become, and they show its applicability to a broad swath of literary texts. In Matthew Sivils’s apt words from the introduction to this volume, “Once we start looking, the ecogothic seems to sprout up everywhere.”2 Indeed, in the past half-decade or so in particular, ecogothic scholarship has proliferated, and the 276 Studies in American Fiction ecogothic itself seems to be found everywhere among us. Moreover, nothing suggests that any of this will slow anytime soon. From an academic point of view, I see this as a very good thing. (Though from the point of view of a human being living on this planet, it’s perhaps less comforting to realize one may be living in a gothic tale!) As the field of ecogothic studies has grown—matured, even—the once amorphous definition of “ecogothic” has become clearer and, I think, more refined.As waves of critics continue to fine tune their usage of the term, it seems to be being applied in two primary ways: as a critical approach or way of studying a text, and as a quality of a literary work itself. That is, one can bring an “ecogothic lens” to a text, and at the same time, that text itself can contain ecogothic elements—in terms of plot, setting, theme, and so forth. In his introduction to this issue, Sivils does a remarkable job surveying the evolving usage and meanings of ecogothic, so I needn’t repeat such a history here. Nor do I feel the need to stake any claim about what the term means or ought to mean. Given its proliferation in the past five years alone, it is hard to say what directions ecogothic studies might take in the coming years. Moreover, given my own inability to foresee the current popularity of ecogothic, I won’t pretend to know where the latest generation of scholars will take it (though I do know I will follow its developments with eagerness). So rather than being prognosticator, in this afterword I simply instead offer a few small observations about the field of gothic studies in general, and ecogothic studies in particular, in order to suggest some possible future developments that I think could be useful. In reading the thoughtful introduction to this special issue, I was struck by Sivils’s astute observation about “waves” of ecogothic scholarship. He notes that a “first wave of the ecogothic was about the recognition of the pervasive... </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STUDIES IN AMERICAN FICTION\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STUDIES IN AMERICAN FICTION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/saf.0.a923009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN AMERICAN FICTION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/saf.0.a923009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为摘要,以下是内容的简要摘录:后记:美国小说研究》50.1-2 (2023):275-285 © 2024 by Johns Hopkins University Press Afterword:Tom J. Hillard Boise State University "然而,总有一天,美国的恶魔必须得到安抚,幽灵必须得到安抚,地方精神必须得到补偿。到那时,人们才会真正热爱美国的土地。然而,这片土地上还存在着太多的威胁"。-D.H. 劳伦斯,《美国经典文学研究》(1923 年)1 2000 年代初,我还是亚利桑那大学的一名博士生,当时我还在摸索 "黑暗自然 "或 "哥特式自然 "的概念,我几乎无法想象 20 年后这本《美国小说研究》特刊的出版。来自世界各地的众多学者为 "生态哥特 "这一蓬勃发展的领域献计献策,这是我做梦也想不到的。那时,生态批评本身还是一个新兴领域,还没有被学术界广泛接受,所以在早期探索生态批评和哥特文学的阴暗角落时,我的工作常常让人感觉相当遥远,而哥特文学本身长期以来一直是一个边缘化的研究领域。我之所以讲述这些,是因为作为生态批评与哥特文学研究相互交织的最早倡导者之一,我一直在关注着这一领域的发展,因此,我怀着特别激动的心情迎接本期杂志的出版。本期刊载的文章共同展示了生态哥特研究的范围和多变性,并显示了其对大量文学文本的适用性。用马修-西维尔斯(Matthew Sivils)在本卷序言中的一句话来说:"一旦我们开始寻找,生态哥特式似乎就会如雨后春笋般涌现。"2 的确,尤其是在过去的半个多世纪里,生态哥特式学术研究如雨后春笋般涌现,而《276 美国小说研究》(276 Studies in American Fiction)中的生态哥特式本身也似乎在我们中间随处可见。而且,没有任何迹象表明这种现象会很快减缓。从学术角度来看,我认为这是一件好事。(不过,从生活在这个星球上的人类的角度来看,意识到自己可能生活在哥特式故事中,也许就不那么令人欣慰了!)。随着生态哥特式研究领域的发展--甚至可以说是成熟--"生态哥特式 "这个曾经模糊不清的定义变得越来越清晰,我认为也越来越精炼。随着一波波批评家不断调整他们对这个术语的用法,它似乎被用于两个主要方面:作为一种批评方法或研究文本的方式,以及作为文学作品本身的一种品质。也就是说,人们可以用 "生态哥特视角 "来审视文本,与此同时,文本本身也可以包含生态哥特元素,如情节、背景、主题等。西维尔斯在本期导言中对 "生态哥特 "不断演变的用法和含义做了详尽的阐述,因此我无需在此赘述。我也不认为有必要对这个词的含义或应该有的含义提出任何主张。鉴于生态哥特研究仅在过去五年中就大量涌现,我们很难说它在未来几年中会朝着什么方向发展。此外,鉴于我自己无法预见生态哥特学目前的流行程度,我也不会假装知道最新一代的学者会把它引向何方(尽管我知道我会热切地关注它的发展)。因此,在这篇后记中,我不打算做预言家,而只是对哥特研究领域,特别是生态哥特研究提出一些小看法,以便提出一些我认为可能有用的未来发展建议。在阅读本特刊的引言时,我被西维尔斯关于生态哥特学术 "浪潮 "的敏锐观察所震撼。他指出,"生态哥特学的第一波浪潮是关于对普遍存在的生态哥特现象的认识......"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Afterword: On Exhuming an Early American Ecogothic
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Afterword: On Exhuming an Early American Ecogothic 275 Studies in American Fiction 50.1–2 (2023): 275–285 © 2024 by Johns Hopkins University Press Afterword: On Exhuming an Early American Ecogothic Tom J. Hillard Boise State University “Yet one day the demons of America must be placated, the ghosts must be appeased, the Spirit of Place atoned for. Then the true passionate love for American Soil will appear. As yet, there is too much menace in the landscape.” —D. H. Lawrence, Studies in Classic American Literature (1923)1 I n the early 2000s, back when I was a doctoral student at the University of Arizona, tinkering with ideas that I then thought of as “dark nature” or “gothic nature,” I could scarcely have imagined, twenty years later, the publication of this special issue of Studies in American Fiction. The thought of such a range of scholars, from around the world, contributing their ideas to the flourishing field of the “ecogothic” was beyond anything that I could have dreamed. Back then, ecocriticism itself was still something of an emerging field, and one by no means yet widely embraced by the academy—so in those early explorations of the shadowy corners of ecocriticism and gothic literature, which itself had long been a marginalized area of study, my work then often felt fairly far afield. I relate all this because, as one of the earliest proponents of the mutually entwined study of ecocriticism and the gothic, I’ve observed the field develop with a watchful eye, and thus it is with particular excitement that I greet this current issue, rich as it is with its varied approaches to the ecogothic. The essays herein collectively demonstrate the range and versatility of what ecogothic studies has become, and they show its applicability to a broad swath of literary texts. In Matthew Sivils’s apt words from the introduction to this volume, “Once we start looking, the ecogothic seems to sprout up everywhere.”2 Indeed, in the past half-decade or so in particular, ecogothic scholarship has proliferated, and the 276 Studies in American Fiction ecogothic itself seems to be found everywhere among us. Moreover, nothing suggests that any of this will slow anytime soon. From an academic point of view, I see this as a very good thing. (Though from the point of view of a human being living on this planet, it’s perhaps less comforting to realize one may be living in a gothic tale!) As the field of ecogothic studies has grown—matured, even—the once amorphous definition of “ecogothic” has become clearer and, I think, more refined.As waves of critics continue to fine tune their usage of the term, it seems to be being applied in two primary ways: as a critical approach or way of studying a text, and as a quality of a literary work itself. That is, one can bring an “ecogothic lens” to a text, and at the same time, that text itself can contain ecogothic elements—in terms of plot, setting, theme, and so forth. In his introduction to this issue, Sivils does a remarkable job surveying the evolving usage and meanings of ecogothic, so I needn’t repeat such a history here. Nor do I feel the need to stake any claim about what the term means or ought to mean. Given its proliferation in the past five years alone, it is hard to say what directions ecogothic studies might take in the coming years. Moreover, given my own inability to foresee the current popularity of ecogothic, I won’t pretend to know where the latest generation of scholars will take it (though I do know I will follow its developments with eagerness). So rather than being prognosticator, in this afterword I simply instead offer a few small observations about the field of gothic studies in general, and ecogothic studies in particular, in order to suggest some possible future developments that I think could be useful. In reading the thoughtful introduction to this special issue, I was struck by Sivils’s astute observation about “waves” of ecogothic scholarship. He notes that a “first wave of the ecogothic was about the recognition of the pervasive...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
STUDIES IN AMERICAN FICTION
STUDIES IN AMERICAN FICTION LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Studies in American Fiction suspended publication in the fall of 2008. In the future, however, Fordham University and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York will jointly edit and publish SAF after a short hiatus; further information and updates will be available from time to time through the web site of Northeastern’s Department of English. SAF thanks the College of Arts and Sciences at Northeastern University for over three decades of support. Studies in American Fiction is a journal of articles and reviews on the prose fiction of the United States, in its full historical range from the colonial period to the present.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信