挖掘水稻残留物的潜力 - 利用不同的氮含量提高小麦的产量、利润和土壤健康水平

IF 2.1 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
S. C. Tripathi, Karnam Venkatesh, Nitesh Kumar, R P Meena
{"title":"挖掘水稻残留物的潜力 - 利用不同的氮含量提高小麦的产量、利润和土壤健康水平","authors":"S. C. Tripathi, Karnam Venkatesh, Nitesh Kumar, R P Meena","doi":"10.1007/s42106-024-00288-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rice residue burning poses a significant challenge in the rice-wheat cropping system of India, leading to environmental pollution, health issues, and substantial nutrient loss. To combat this menace, a three-year study (2020-21 to 2022-23) was conducted, investigating the effects of rice residue retention (RRR) and rice residue incorporation (RRI) at graded N levels (0, 50, 100, 150, and 200 kg/ha) alongside farmers’ practices. The primary objective was to enhance wheat productivity, profitability, and soil fertility within this system. Pooled analysis revealed that RRR outperformed RRI at lower nitrogen doses, while RRI excelled with 7.5%, 7.4%, and 10.0% higher biological yields at higher nitrogen doses (100, 150, and 200 kg/ha). The success of RRR and RRI was attributed to 10.5% and 5.0% higher effective tiller/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively, compared to farmers’ practices at 150 kg N/ha. Notably, RRR exhibited superior NDVI values at the flag leaf stage (0.76) over farmers’ practices (0.73). At the 150 kg N/ha, RRR displayed a 9.6% lower cost of cultivation compared to farmers’ practices, with 19.6% higher net returns at lower N levels (50 kg/ha), suggesting its greater benefits under low-input conditions. Furthermore, RRR showed the highest benefit-cost ratio (2.75) at 150 kg N/ha, followed by RRI (2.59) and farmers’ practices (2.55). Over the three-year period, RRR significantly increased organic carbon content (0.49–0.54%) compared to the initial value (0.38%), affirming its long-term benefits. Consequently, the adoption of RRR by farmers is a preferable eco-friendly option over RRI and present practices for enhancing wheat productivity within the rice-wheat system. Due to 60–65% saving of fuel with the practice of zero tillage along with rice residue retention, it can reduce CO<sub>2</sub> emission by 120 kg/ha, therefore, its implementation can reduce CO<sub>2</sub> release by 1.62 MT in South Asia per year. Ultimately, it can meet the target of Paris Agreement of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and reaching net-zero CO<sub>2</sub> emissions globally by 2050.</p>","PeriodicalId":54947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Plant Production","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unravelling the Potential of Rice Residue - Boosting Wheat’s Productivity, Profit, and Soil Health with Varying N Levels\",\"authors\":\"S. C. Tripathi, Karnam Venkatesh, Nitesh Kumar, R P Meena\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42106-024-00288-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Rice residue burning poses a significant challenge in the rice-wheat cropping system of India, leading to environmental pollution, health issues, and substantial nutrient loss. To combat this menace, a three-year study (2020-21 to 2022-23) was conducted, investigating the effects of rice residue retention (RRR) and rice residue incorporation (RRI) at graded N levels (0, 50, 100, 150, and 200 kg/ha) alongside farmers’ practices. The primary objective was to enhance wheat productivity, profitability, and soil fertility within this system. Pooled analysis revealed that RRR outperformed RRI at lower nitrogen doses, while RRI excelled with 7.5%, 7.4%, and 10.0% higher biological yields at higher nitrogen doses (100, 150, and 200 kg/ha). The success of RRR and RRI was attributed to 10.5% and 5.0% higher effective tiller/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively, compared to farmers’ practices at 150 kg N/ha. Notably, RRR exhibited superior NDVI values at the flag leaf stage (0.76) over farmers’ practices (0.73). At the 150 kg N/ha, RRR displayed a 9.6% lower cost of cultivation compared to farmers’ practices, with 19.6% higher net returns at lower N levels (50 kg/ha), suggesting its greater benefits under low-input conditions. Furthermore, RRR showed the highest benefit-cost ratio (2.75) at 150 kg N/ha, followed by RRI (2.59) and farmers’ practices (2.55). Over the three-year period, RRR significantly increased organic carbon content (0.49–0.54%) compared to the initial value (0.38%), affirming its long-term benefits. Consequently, the adoption of RRR by farmers is a preferable eco-friendly option over RRI and present practices for enhancing wheat productivity within the rice-wheat system. Due to 60–65% saving of fuel with the practice of zero tillage along with rice residue retention, it can reduce CO<sub>2</sub> emission by 120 kg/ha, therefore, its implementation can reduce CO<sub>2</sub> release by 1.62 MT in South Asia per year. Ultimately, it can meet the target of Paris Agreement of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and reaching net-zero CO<sub>2</sub> emissions globally by 2050.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Plant Production\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Plant Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-024-00288-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Plant Production","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-024-00288-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在印度的水稻-小麦种植系统中,焚烧稻米残留物是一项重大挑战,会导致环境污染、健康问题和大量养分流失。为了应对这一威胁,我们开展了一项为期三年(2020-21 年至 2022-23 年)的研究,调查在分级氮水平(0、50、100、150 和 200 千克/公顷)下,稻米残留物保留(RRR)和稻米残留物掺入(RRI)与农民实践相结合的效果。主要目的是在该系统中提高小麦产量、收益率和土壤肥力。汇总分析表明,在氮剂量较低时,RRR 的表现优于 RRI,而在氮剂量较高时(100、150 和 200 千克/公顷),RRI 的生物产量分别高出 7.5%、7.4% 和 10.0%。在 150 千克/公顷的施氮量下,RRR 和 RRI 的有效分蘖/平方米分别比农民的做法高出 10.5% 和 5.0%。值得注意的是,RRR 在旗叶期的 NDVI 值(0.76)优于农民的做法(0.73)。在氮含量为 150 千克/公顷时,RRR 的种植成本比农民的做法低 9.6%,在氮含量较低(50 千克/公顷)时,净收益高出 19.6%,这表明其在低投入条件下具有更大的效益。此外,在氮含量为 150 千克/公顷时,RRR 的效益成本比最高(2.75),其次是 RRI(2.59)和农民耕作法(2.55)。在三年期间,与初始值(0.38%)相比,RRR 显著增加了有机碳含量(0.49%-0.54%),这肯定了其长期效益。因此,与 RRI 和现有做法相比,农民采用 RRR 是提高稻麦系统中小麦产量的一种可取的生态友好型选择。由于零耕作和水稻残留物保留可节省 60-65% 的燃料,每公顷可减少 120 公斤的二氧化碳排放量,因此,在南亚地区实施零耕作每年可减少 1.62 公吨的二氧化碳排放量。最终,它可以实现《巴黎协定》的目标,即到 2050 年将全球升温幅度限制在高于工业化前水平 1.5 ℃,并实现全球二氧化碳净零排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Unravelling the Potential of Rice Residue - Boosting Wheat’s Productivity, Profit, and Soil Health with Varying N Levels

Unravelling the Potential of Rice Residue - Boosting Wheat’s Productivity, Profit, and Soil Health with Varying N Levels

Rice residue burning poses a significant challenge in the rice-wheat cropping system of India, leading to environmental pollution, health issues, and substantial nutrient loss. To combat this menace, a three-year study (2020-21 to 2022-23) was conducted, investigating the effects of rice residue retention (RRR) and rice residue incorporation (RRI) at graded N levels (0, 50, 100, 150, and 200 kg/ha) alongside farmers’ practices. The primary objective was to enhance wheat productivity, profitability, and soil fertility within this system. Pooled analysis revealed that RRR outperformed RRI at lower nitrogen doses, while RRI excelled with 7.5%, 7.4%, and 10.0% higher biological yields at higher nitrogen doses (100, 150, and 200 kg/ha). The success of RRR and RRI was attributed to 10.5% and 5.0% higher effective tiller/m2, respectively, compared to farmers’ practices at 150 kg N/ha. Notably, RRR exhibited superior NDVI values at the flag leaf stage (0.76) over farmers’ practices (0.73). At the 150 kg N/ha, RRR displayed a 9.6% lower cost of cultivation compared to farmers’ practices, with 19.6% higher net returns at lower N levels (50 kg/ha), suggesting its greater benefits under low-input conditions. Furthermore, RRR showed the highest benefit-cost ratio (2.75) at 150 kg N/ha, followed by RRI (2.59) and farmers’ practices (2.55). Over the three-year period, RRR significantly increased organic carbon content (0.49–0.54%) compared to the initial value (0.38%), affirming its long-term benefits. Consequently, the adoption of RRR by farmers is a preferable eco-friendly option over RRI and present practices for enhancing wheat productivity within the rice-wheat system. Due to 60–65% saving of fuel with the practice of zero tillage along with rice residue retention, it can reduce CO2 emission by 120 kg/ha, therefore, its implementation can reduce CO2 release by 1.62 MT in South Asia per year. Ultimately, it can meet the target of Paris Agreement of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and reaching net-zero CO2 emissions globally by 2050.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: IJPP publishes original research papers and review papers related to physiology, ecology and production of field crops and forages at field, farm and landscape level. Preferred topics are: (1) yield gap in cropping systems: estimation, causes and closing measures, (2) ecological intensification of plant production, (3) improvement of water and nutrients management in plant production systems, (4) environmental impact of plant production, (5) climate change and plant production, and (6) responses of plant communities to extreme weather conditions. Please note that IJPP does not publish papers with a background in genetics and plant breeding, plant molecular biology, plant biotechnology, as well as soil science, meteorology, product process and post-harvest management unless they are strongly related to plant production under field conditions. Papers based on limited data or of local importance, and results from routine experiments will not normally be considered for publication. Field experiments should include at least two years and/or two environments. Papers on plants other than field crops and forages, and papers based on controlled-environment experiments will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信