对斜方肌切除术后有症状的肩胛掌撞击的治疗方案进行系统回顾。

Tomos Richards, Ryan W Trickett
{"title":"对斜方肌切除术后有症状的肩胛掌撞击的治疗方案进行系统回顾。","authors":"Tomos Richards, Ryan W Trickett","doi":"10.1177/17531934241240858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pain after trapeziectomy is a vexing problem, most commonly due to scaphometacarpal impingement. A number of treatment strategies have been described and are examined in this systematic review. In total, 27 studies describing revision surgery for unsatisfactory results after trapeziectomy were included. Results after soft tissue or synthetic suspensionplasties, arthrodesis procedures, implant arthroplasty and costochondral autografting were included. Most studies were heterogeneous in terms of patient selection and procedure performed, and the level of evidence and methodological quality were uniformly low. Autologous suspensionplasty procedures are the best studied and most rigorously reported techniques, with modest improvements in pain widely reported. Newer techniques using synthetic suture button suspension are encouraging with the benefit of earlier mobilization but require further study. Due to high incidences of complication and revision, the literature does not support the use of implant arthroplasty after trapeziectomy. Arthrodesis appears to be a reasonable last resort when attempts at suspension have failed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94237,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","volume":" ","pages":"1340-1349"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of management options for symptomatic scaphometacarpal impingement after trapeziectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Tomos Richards, Ryan W Trickett\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17531934241240858\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pain after trapeziectomy is a vexing problem, most commonly due to scaphometacarpal impingement. A number of treatment strategies have been described and are examined in this systematic review. In total, 27 studies describing revision surgery for unsatisfactory results after trapeziectomy were included. Results after soft tissue or synthetic suspensionplasties, arthrodesis procedures, implant arthroplasty and costochondral autografting were included. Most studies were heterogeneous in terms of patient selection and procedure performed, and the level of evidence and methodological quality were uniformly low. Autologous suspensionplasty procedures are the best studied and most rigorously reported techniques, with modest improvements in pain widely reported. Newer techniques using synthetic suture button suspension are encouraging with the benefit of earlier mobilization but require further study. Due to high incidences of complication and revision, the literature does not support the use of implant arthroplasty after trapeziectomy. Arthrodesis appears to be a reasonable last resort when attempts at suspension have failed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1340-1349\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934241240858\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934241240858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

梯形切除术后疼痛是一个令人头疼的问题,最常见的原因是肩胛掌撞击。本系统综述研究了多种治疗策略。总共有 27 项研究描述了因斜方肌切除术后效果不理想而进行翻修手术的情况。其中包括软组织或合成悬吊成形术、关节固定术、植入物关节成形术和肋软骨自体移植术后的结果。大多数研究在患者选择和手术方式上存在差异,证据水平和方法质量均较低。自体悬吊成形术是研究最深入、报道最严谨的技术,疼痛略有改善的报道很多。使用合成缝合纽扣悬吊的新技术令人鼓舞,其优点是可以更早地活动,但还需要进一步研究。由于并发症和翻修的发生率较高,文献不支持在梯形切除术后使用植入关节成形术。当悬吊尝试失败后,关节置换术似乎是合理的最后手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review of management options for symptomatic scaphometacarpal impingement after trapeziectomy.

Pain after trapeziectomy is a vexing problem, most commonly due to scaphometacarpal impingement. A number of treatment strategies have been described and are examined in this systematic review. In total, 27 studies describing revision surgery for unsatisfactory results after trapeziectomy were included. Results after soft tissue or synthetic suspensionplasties, arthrodesis procedures, implant arthroplasty and costochondral autografting were included. Most studies were heterogeneous in terms of patient selection and procedure performed, and the level of evidence and methodological quality were uniformly low. Autologous suspensionplasty procedures are the best studied and most rigorously reported techniques, with modest improvements in pain widely reported. Newer techniques using synthetic suture button suspension are encouraging with the benefit of earlier mobilization but require further study. Due to high incidences of complication and revision, the literature does not support the use of implant arthroplasty after trapeziectomy. Arthrodesis appears to be a reasonable last resort when attempts at suspension have failed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信