Celina Cornelius, Teresa Deffner, Aileen Hill, Christina Rohlfes, Bernd Ellner, Silke Klarmann, Sabine Riedel, Sabrina Pelz, Sabrina Kopp, Laura Borgstedt, Diana Freund, Andreas Schöpfel, Patrick Meybohm, Felix Walcher, Thorsten Brenner, Stefanie Klenke
{"title":"[关于怀孕期间在重症监护室工作的立场文件:DIVI 关于改善重症监护室怀孕员工状况的建议]。","authors":"Celina Cornelius, Teresa Deffner, Aileen Hill, Christina Rohlfes, Bernd Ellner, Silke Klarmann, Sabine Riedel, Sabrina Pelz, Sabrina Kopp, Laura Borgstedt, Diana Freund, Andreas Schöpfel, Patrick Meybohm, Felix Walcher, Thorsten Brenner, Stefanie Klenke","doi":"10.1007/s00101-024-01402-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Maternity Protection Act is intended to protect the mother and the child from hazards, excessive demands and damage to health in the workplace, and from financial disadvantages and loss of employment. However, the objectives defined by the Maternity Protection Act-the safety and health of the pregnant employee on the one hand and the prevention of disadvantages in working life on the other-are not yet adequately achieved in the intensive care unit (ICU). Implementation of the Maternity Protection Act to the benefit of all involved parties should also be promoted in the specialist areas represented by the DIVI, in particular the work of pregnant physicians and nursing staff and other working specialists (respiratory therapists, physiotherapists, speech therapists, psychotherapists, and social workers) in the ICU. The aim of this paper is to raise awareness of the need to consider each pregnant and breastfeeding staff member individually and to work together to find a personal solution for continuing to work in the ICU. Possible ways and solutions to achieve this goal are outlined and practical examples are given for implementation in everyday clinical routine. These are also based on comprehensive presentation of activities according to a traffic light color-code system for all occupational groups. Arguments against pregnant employees working in the ICU are discussed and possible solutions are presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":72805,"journal":{"name":"Die Anaesthesiologie","volume":" ","pages":"263-271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Position paper on working in the intensive care unit during pregnancy : DIVI recommendations for improving the situation of pregnant employees in the ICU].\",\"authors\":\"Celina Cornelius, Teresa Deffner, Aileen Hill, Christina Rohlfes, Bernd Ellner, Silke Klarmann, Sabine Riedel, Sabrina Pelz, Sabrina Kopp, Laura Borgstedt, Diana Freund, Andreas Schöpfel, Patrick Meybohm, Felix Walcher, Thorsten Brenner, Stefanie Klenke\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00101-024-01402-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Maternity Protection Act is intended to protect the mother and the child from hazards, excessive demands and damage to health in the workplace, and from financial disadvantages and loss of employment. However, the objectives defined by the Maternity Protection Act-the safety and health of the pregnant employee on the one hand and the prevention of disadvantages in working life on the other-are not yet adequately achieved in the intensive care unit (ICU). Implementation of the Maternity Protection Act to the benefit of all involved parties should also be promoted in the specialist areas represented by the DIVI, in particular the work of pregnant physicians and nursing staff and other working specialists (respiratory therapists, physiotherapists, speech therapists, psychotherapists, and social workers) in the ICU. The aim of this paper is to raise awareness of the need to consider each pregnant and breastfeeding staff member individually and to work together to find a personal solution for continuing to work in the ICU. Possible ways and solutions to achieve this goal are outlined and practical examples are given for implementation in everyday clinical routine. These are also based on comprehensive presentation of activities according to a traffic light color-code system for all occupational groups. Arguments against pregnant employees working in the ICU are discussed and possible solutions are presented.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Die Anaesthesiologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"263-271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Die Anaesthesiologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-024-01402-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Anaesthesiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-024-01402-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
孕产妇保护法》旨在保护母亲和婴儿免受工作场所的危险、过度要求和健康损害,以及经济劣势和失业。然而,《孕产妇保护法》所确定的目标--一方面是怀孕员工的安全和健康,另一方面是防止工作生活中的不利因素--在重症监护室(ICU)尚未充分实现。此外,还应在 DIVI 所代表的专业领域,特别是重症监护室中怀孕医生和护理人员以及其他工作专家(呼吸治疗师、物理治疗师、语言治疗师、心理治疗师和社会工作者)的工作中,促进《孕产妇保护法》的实施,使所有相关方受益。本文旨在提高人们的认识,即有必要单独考虑每位怀孕和哺乳期工作人员,并共同寻找个人解决方案,以继续在重症监护室工作。本文概述了实现这一目标的可行方法和解决方案,并提供了在日常临床工作中实施的实例。此外,还根据交通灯颜色编码系统对所有职业类别的活动进行了全面介绍。讨论了反对怀孕员工在重症监护室工作的论点,并提出了可能的解决方案。
[Position paper on working in the intensive care unit during pregnancy : DIVI recommendations for improving the situation of pregnant employees in the ICU].
The Maternity Protection Act is intended to protect the mother and the child from hazards, excessive demands and damage to health in the workplace, and from financial disadvantages and loss of employment. However, the objectives defined by the Maternity Protection Act-the safety and health of the pregnant employee on the one hand and the prevention of disadvantages in working life on the other-are not yet adequately achieved in the intensive care unit (ICU). Implementation of the Maternity Protection Act to the benefit of all involved parties should also be promoted in the specialist areas represented by the DIVI, in particular the work of pregnant physicians and nursing staff and other working specialists (respiratory therapists, physiotherapists, speech therapists, psychotherapists, and social workers) in the ICU. The aim of this paper is to raise awareness of the need to consider each pregnant and breastfeeding staff member individually and to work together to find a personal solution for continuing to work in the ICU. Possible ways and solutions to achieve this goal are outlined and practical examples are given for implementation in everyday clinical routine. These are also based on comprehensive presentation of activities according to a traffic light color-code system for all occupational groups. Arguments against pregnant employees working in the ICU are discussed and possible solutions are presented.