Patrícia Pereira Alfredo, Mark I Johnson, Jan Magnus Bjordal, Adriana Teresa Silva Santos, Giovani Bravin Peres, Washington Steagall Junior, Raquel Aparecida Casarotto
{"title":"双动力电流作为运动的辅助手段对控制成人膝关节骨性关节炎症状的疗效:随机对照临床试验。","authors":"Patrícia Pereira Alfredo, Mark I Johnson, Jan Magnus Bjordal, Adriana Teresa Silva Santos, Giovani Bravin Peres, Washington Steagall Junior, Raquel Aparecida Casarotto","doi":"10.1177/02692155241236611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect of diadynamic currents administered prior to exercises on pain and disability in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized-controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Special Rehabilitation Services in Taboão da Serra.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Participants were randomly allocated to Group I (diadynamic currents and exercises; n = 30, 60 knees) or Group II (exercises alone; n = 30, 60 knees) and were treated three times a week for 8 weeks.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome measures were change in knee pain evaluated by visual analog scale and disability Index Score (Lequesne). Secondary outcomes included change in mobility (Timed Up and Go test), range of motion (goniometer), muscle strength (dynamometer), a composite score for pain and disability (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis questionnaire), and a drug diary to measure consumption of rescue pain medication (paracetamol). All measurements were collected at baseline, 8 weeks, and 6 months from baseline (follow-up).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 60 participants with a mean (SD) age of 63.40 (8.20) years. Between-group differences in the follow-up (8 weeks and 6 months) were observed for pain at rest, pain during activities of daily living and disability. There was improvement in Group I that was maintained for the three variables 6 months after treatment. Mean difference for pain at rest was -3.08 points (95% confidence interval -4.13; -2.02), <i>p</i> < 0.01 with an effect size of 1.4; mean difference for pain during activities of daily living was -2.40 points (95% confidence interval -3.34; -1.45), <i>p</i> < 0.01 with an effect size of 1.24; and mean difference for disability was -4.08 points (95% confidence interval -5.89; -2.26), <i>p</i> < 0.01 with an effect size of 1.04.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis receiving 8 weeks of treatment with diadynamic currents as an adjunct to a program of exercises had significantly greater improvements in pain and disability than those receiving exercises alone. Beneficial effects were sustained for 6 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"920-931"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of diadynamic currents as an adjunct to exercise to manage symptoms of knee osteoarthritis in adults: A randomized controlled clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Patrícia Pereira Alfredo, Mark I Johnson, Jan Magnus Bjordal, Adriana Teresa Silva Santos, Giovani Bravin Peres, Washington Steagall Junior, Raquel Aparecida Casarotto\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155241236611\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect of diadynamic currents administered prior to exercises on pain and disability in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized-controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Special Rehabilitation Services in Taboão da Serra.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Participants were randomly allocated to Group I (diadynamic currents and exercises; n = 30, 60 knees) or Group II (exercises alone; n = 30, 60 knees) and were treated three times a week for 8 weeks.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome measures were change in knee pain evaluated by visual analog scale and disability Index Score (Lequesne). Secondary outcomes included change in mobility (Timed Up and Go test), range of motion (goniometer), muscle strength (dynamometer), a composite score for pain and disability (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis questionnaire), and a drug diary to measure consumption of rescue pain medication (paracetamol). All measurements were collected at baseline, 8 weeks, and 6 months from baseline (follow-up).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 60 participants with a mean (SD) age of 63.40 (8.20) years. Between-group differences in the follow-up (8 weeks and 6 months) were observed for pain at rest, pain during activities of daily living and disability. There was improvement in Group I that was maintained for the three variables 6 months after treatment. Mean difference for pain at rest was -3.08 points (95% confidence interval -4.13; -2.02), <i>p</i> < 0.01 with an effect size of 1.4; mean difference for pain during activities of daily living was -2.40 points (95% confidence interval -3.34; -1.45), <i>p</i> < 0.01 with an effect size of 1.24; and mean difference for disability was -4.08 points (95% confidence interval -5.89; -2.26), <i>p</i> < 0.01 with an effect size of 1.04.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis receiving 8 weeks of treatment with diadynamic currents as an adjunct to a program of exercises had significantly greater improvements in pain and disability than those receiving exercises alone. Beneficial effects were sustained for 6 months.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"920-931\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241236611\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241236611","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的研究在膝关节骨性关节炎患者锻炼前使用动态电流对其疼痛和残疾的影响:随机对照试验:参与者:双侧膝关节骨性关节炎患者干预:参与者被随机分配到I组(动态电流和锻炼;n=30,60个膝关节)或II组(单独锻炼;n=30,60个膝关节),每周治疗三次,为期8周:主要结果指标:膝关节疼痛的变化由视觉模拟量表和伤残指数评分(勒奎恩)评估。次要结果包括活动能力(定时起立和走动测试)、活动范围(动态关节角度计)、肌肉力量(测力计)、疼痛和残疾综合评分(西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎问卷)的变化,以及用于测量止痛药(扑热息痛)消耗量的药物日记。所有测量均在基线、8 周和 6 个月后(随访)进行:共有 60 名参与者,平均(标清)年龄为 63.40(8.20)岁。在随访(8 周和 6 个月)期间,观察到组间在休息时疼痛、日常生活活动时疼痛和残疾方面存在差异。治疗 6 个月后,第一组的三个变量均有所改善,并保持不变。休息时疼痛的平均差异为-3.08分(95%置信区间-4.13;-2.02),P P P 结论:有症状的膝关节骨性关节炎患者在接受为期8周的双动力电流辅助运动治疗后,疼痛和残疾的改善程度明显高于单纯接受运动治疗的患者。疗效可持续 6 个月。
Efficacy of diadynamic currents as an adjunct to exercise to manage symptoms of knee osteoarthritis in adults: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Objective: To investigate the effect of diadynamic currents administered prior to exercises on pain and disability in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.
Design: A randomized-controlled trial.
Setting: Special Rehabilitation Services in Taboão da Serra.
Participants: Patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis.
Intervention: Participants were randomly allocated to Group I (diadynamic currents and exercises; n = 30, 60 knees) or Group II (exercises alone; n = 30, 60 knees) and were treated three times a week for 8 weeks.
Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measures were change in knee pain evaluated by visual analog scale and disability Index Score (Lequesne). Secondary outcomes included change in mobility (Timed Up and Go test), range of motion (goniometer), muscle strength (dynamometer), a composite score for pain and disability (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis questionnaire), and a drug diary to measure consumption of rescue pain medication (paracetamol). All measurements were collected at baseline, 8 weeks, and 6 months from baseline (follow-up).
Results: There were 60 participants with a mean (SD) age of 63.40 (8.20) years. Between-group differences in the follow-up (8 weeks and 6 months) were observed for pain at rest, pain during activities of daily living and disability. There was improvement in Group I that was maintained for the three variables 6 months after treatment. Mean difference for pain at rest was -3.08 points (95% confidence interval -4.13; -2.02), p < 0.01 with an effect size of 1.4; mean difference for pain during activities of daily living was -2.40 points (95% confidence interval -3.34; -1.45), p < 0.01 with an effect size of 1.24; and mean difference for disability was -4.08 points (95% confidence interval -5.89; -2.26), p < 0.01 with an effect size of 1.04.
Conclusion: Patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis receiving 8 weeks of treatment with diadynamic currents as an adjunct to a program of exercises had significantly greater improvements in pain and disability than those receiving exercises alone. Beneficial effects were sustained for 6 months.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)