{"title":"医科本科生的性别意识和偏见调查:纽芬兰和拉布拉多的视角。","authors":"Erika Maxwell, Gillian Sheppard, Yanqing Yi","doi":"10.36834/cmej.75919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Female physicians and patients experience gender bias in healthcare. The purpose of this research is to explore medical students' gender bias toward physicians and patients and whether their bias varies by gender.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed medical students at Memorial University between November 2020 and April 2021. We recruited participants through Facebook, email, and e-posters. We collected demographic information, including gender and class year. We used the Nijmegen Gender Awareness in Medicine Scale to measure gender sensitivity, gender role ideology toward patients, and gender role ideology toward doctors. We analyzed the data using averages and t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean gender sensitivity scores were 4/5 indicating high gender sensitivity. Gender role ideology toward doctors mean scores were 2/5 indicating that students did not hold strong stereotypical views toward doctors. Although male students scored higher than female students (p<.05), mean scores for gender role ideology toward patients were low for both male and female students (<math><mover><mi>x</mi><mo>¯</mo></mover></math> <2), indicating low stereotyping toward patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that students held largely non-biased ideologies surrounding gender in medicine and that female students were even less biased than male students for gender role ideology toward patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":72503,"journal":{"name":"Canadian medical education journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"48-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10961117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey of undergraduate medical students' gender awareness and bias: the Newfoundland and Labrador perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Erika Maxwell, Gillian Sheppard, Yanqing Yi\",\"doi\":\"10.36834/cmej.75919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Female physicians and patients experience gender bias in healthcare. The purpose of this research is to explore medical students' gender bias toward physicians and patients and whether their bias varies by gender.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed medical students at Memorial University between November 2020 and April 2021. We recruited participants through Facebook, email, and e-posters. We collected demographic information, including gender and class year. We used the Nijmegen Gender Awareness in Medicine Scale to measure gender sensitivity, gender role ideology toward patients, and gender role ideology toward doctors. We analyzed the data using averages and t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean gender sensitivity scores were 4/5 indicating high gender sensitivity. Gender role ideology toward doctors mean scores were 2/5 indicating that students did not hold strong stereotypical views toward doctors. Although male students scored higher than female students (p<.05), mean scores for gender role ideology toward patients were low for both male and female students (<math><mover><mi>x</mi><mo>¯</mo></mover></math> <2), indicating low stereotyping toward patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that students held largely non-biased ideologies surrounding gender in medicine and that female students were even less biased than male students for gender role ideology toward patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian medical education journal\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"48-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10961117/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian medical education journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.75919\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian medical education journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.75919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:女医生和女病人在医疗保健中存在性别偏见。本研究旨在探讨医学生对医生和患者的性别偏见,以及他们的偏见是否因性别而异:我们在 2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 4 月期间对纪念大学的医学生进行了调查。我们通过 Facebook、电子邮件和电子海报招募参与者。我们收集了人口统计学信息,包括性别和班级年级。我们使用奈梅亨医学性别意识量表(Nijmegen Gender Awareness in Medicine Scale)来测量性别敏感度、对患者的性别角色意识形态以及对医生的性别角色意识形态。我们使用平均数和 t 检验对数据进行了分析:结果:性别敏感度平均分为 4/5,表明性别敏感度较高。对医生的性别角色意识形态的平均得分为 2/5,表明学生对医生没有强烈的刻板印象。尽管男生的得分高于女生(px¯ 结论),但我们发现学生对医生的性别角色意识形态基本没有偏见:我们发现,学生对医学中的性别问题基本没有偏见,而在对病人的性别角色意识形态方面,女生甚至比男生更少偏见。
A survey of undergraduate medical students' gender awareness and bias: the Newfoundland and Labrador perspective.
Background: Female physicians and patients experience gender bias in healthcare. The purpose of this research is to explore medical students' gender bias toward physicians and patients and whether their bias varies by gender.
Methods: We surveyed medical students at Memorial University between November 2020 and April 2021. We recruited participants through Facebook, email, and e-posters. We collected demographic information, including gender and class year. We used the Nijmegen Gender Awareness in Medicine Scale to measure gender sensitivity, gender role ideology toward patients, and gender role ideology toward doctors. We analyzed the data using averages and t-tests.
Results: Mean gender sensitivity scores were 4/5 indicating high gender sensitivity. Gender role ideology toward doctors mean scores were 2/5 indicating that students did not hold strong stereotypical views toward doctors. Although male students scored higher than female students (p<.05), mean scores for gender role ideology toward patients were low for both male and female students ( <2), indicating low stereotyping toward patients.
Conclusions: We found that students held largely non-biased ideologies surrounding gender in medicine and that female students were even less biased than male students for gender role ideology toward patients.