Eli W Janover, Camille La Brooy, Jennifer Philip, Sophie Lewis, Ian Kerridge, Paul A Komesaroff
{"title":"澳大利亚犹太社区成员对临终关怀和自愿协助死亡的态度。","authors":"Eli W Janover, Camille La Brooy, Jennifer Philip, Sophie Lewis, Ian Kerridge, Paul A Komesaroff","doi":"10.1007/s10943-024-02028-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The implementation of voluntary assisted dying (VAD) in the Australian State of Victoria in 2019 has stimulated discussions about end-of-life care and dying in many communities. Various attempts have been made to represent the attitudes of the Jewish community, a distinct culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) group, in terms that suggest a unified set of opinions that opposes VAD policies. This research aimed to explore attitudes to VAD in the context of end-of-life care held by members of the Victorian Jewish community. A descriptive qualitative methodological design was employed. Ten Victorians who identify as Jewish were recruited and participated in in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Reflexive thematic analysis was carried out on the transcripts to identify key themes, attitudes and preferences in relation to end-of-life care, death and dying, and VAD. Three themes were identified: \"complexity and variation\", \"similarities\", and \"factors influencing attitudes to VAD and end-of-life care\". A significant degree of diversity was apparent, ranging from highly supportive of VAD to advocacy for a total repeal of the policy. The results indicate that images of how Victorian Jewish individuals feel towards VAD based on essentialised notions about the community and belief systems are not supported by the evidence. In reality, considerable diversity of attitudes exists towards VAD and end-of-life care. We conclude that it is important that policymakers and members of the broader society avoid stereotypes that falsely characterise this specific community and, by implication, other CALD groups, particularly in terms that ignore internal diversity regarding belief systems, social attitudes and ethical perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":48054,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religion & Health","volume":" ","pages":"82-102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11845401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes to End-of-Life Care and Voluntary Assisted Dying Amongst Members of the Australian Jewish community.\",\"authors\":\"Eli W Janover, Camille La Brooy, Jennifer Philip, Sophie Lewis, Ian Kerridge, Paul A Komesaroff\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10943-024-02028-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The implementation of voluntary assisted dying (VAD) in the Australian State of Victoria in 2019 has stimulated discussions about end-of-life care and dying in many communities. Various attempts have been made to represent the attitudes of the Jewish community, a distinct culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) group, in terms that suggest a unified set of opinions that opposes VAD policies. This research aimed to explore attitudes to VAD in the context of end-of-life care held by members of the Victorian Jewish community. A descriptive qualitative methodological design was employed. Ten Victorians who identify as Jewish were recruited and participated in in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Reflexive thematic analysis was carried out on the transcripts to identify key themes, attitudes and preferences in relation to end-of-life care, death and dying, and VAD. Three themes were identified: \\\"complexity and variation\\\", \\\"similarities\\\", and \\\"factors influencing attitudes to VAD and end-of-life care\\\". A significant degree of diversity was apparent, ranging from highly supportive of VAD to advocacy for a total repeal of the policy. The results indicate that images of how Victorian Jewish individuals feel towards VAD based on essentialised notions about the community and belief systems are not supported by the evidence. In reality, considerable diversity of attitudes exists towards VAD and end-of-life care. We conclude that it is important that policymakers and members of the broader society avoid stereotypes that falsely characterise this specific community and, by implication, other CALD groups, particularly in terms that ignore internal diversity regarding belief systems, social attitudes and ethical perspectives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Religion & Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"82-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11845401/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Religion & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-024-02028-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Religion & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-024-02028-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
澳大利亚维多利亚州于 2019 年开始实施自愿协助死亡(VAD),这引发了许多社区关于临终关怀和死亡的讨论。犹太社区是一个具有独特文化和语言多样性(CALD)的群体,人们试图用各种措辞来代表他们的态度,暗示他们有一套统一的意见来反对自愿协助死亡政策。本研究旨在探讨维多利亚州犹太社区成员在临终关怀背景下对 VAD 的态度。研究采用了描述性定性方法设计。研究人员招募了 10 名维多利亚州犹太人,并对他们进行了深入的半结构化访谈。我们对访谈记录进行了反思性主题分析,以确定与临终关怀、死亡和濒死以及 VAD 有关的关键主题、态度和偏好。确定了三个主题:"复杂性和差异性"、"相似性 "和 "影响对 VAD 和临终关怀态度的因素"。研究结果显示了很大程度的多样性,既有对自愿中止妊娠的高度支持,也有对完全废除该政策的主张。研究结果表明,维多利亚州犹太人基于对社区和信仰体系的基本概念而对自愿终止妊娠的看法是没有证据支持的。在现实生活中,人们对 VAD 和临终关怀的态度存在着相当大的差异。我们的结论是,政策制定者和广大社会成员必须避免对这一特定群体以及其他 CALD 群体错误定性的刻板印象,尤其是在忽视信仰体系、社会态度和伦理观点的内部多样性方面。
Attitudes to End-of-Life Care and Voluntary Assisted Dying Amongst Members of the Australian Jewish community.
The implementation of voluntary assisted dying (VAD) in the Australian State of Victoria in 2019 has stimulated discussions about end-of-life care and dying in many communities. Various attempts have been made to represent the attitudes of the Jewish community, a distinct culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) group, in terms that suggest a unified set of opinions that opposes VAD policies. This research aimed to explore attitudes to VAD in the context of end-of-life care held by members of the Victorian Jewish community. A descriptive qualitative methodological design was employed. Ten Victorians who identify as Jewish were recruited and participated in in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Reflexive thematic analysis was carried out on the transcripts to identify key themes, attitudes and preferences in relation to end-of-life care, death and dying, and VAD. Three themes were identified: "complexity and variation", "similarities", and "factors influencing attitudes to VAD and end-of-life care". A significant degree of diversity was apparent, ranging from highly supportive of VAD to advocacy for a total repeal of the policy. The results indicate that images of how Victorian Jewish individuals feel towards VAD based on essentialised notions about the community and belief systems are not supported by the evidence. In reality, considerable diversity of attitudes exists towards VAD and end-of-life care. We conclude that it is important that policymakers and members of the broader society avoid stereotypes that falsely characterise this specific community and, by implication, other CALD groups, particularly in terms that ignore internal diversity regarding belief systems, social attitudes and ethical perspectives.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Religion and Health is an international publication concerned with the creative partnership of psychology and religion/sprituality and the relationship between religion/spirituality and both mental and physical health. This multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary journal publishes peer-reviewed original contributions from scholars and professionals of all religious faiths. Articles may be clinical, statistical, theoretical, impressionistic, or anecdotal. Founded in 1961 by the Blanton-Peale Institute, which joins the perspectives of psychology and religion, Journal of Religion and Health explores the most contemporary modes of religious thought with particular emphasis on their relevance to current medical and psychological research.