{"title":"舞台上的理论:拉图尔和艾特-图阿蒂的《地球内部》和《移动的地球》中的人类世观众悖论","authors":"Liliane Campos","doi":"10.5325/tpnc.1.1.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article examines the epistemological dimension of spectatorship in two lecture performances created by philosopher Bruno Latour and theater director Frédérique Aït-Touati. Inside (2016) and Moving Earths (2019) invite their audiences to question how they view the Earth, and to explore new visualizations that may foster political awareness of a “new climate regime.” The scenography and dramaturgy of these lectures perform the disruptions of perspective brought about by Gaia theory, in which the observer must perceive herself as part of an entangled Earth system. The article argues that despite this emphasis on entanglement, the philosopher on stage still functions as a figure of distanced theoretical spectatorship. The resulting tension between the lecture format and its philosophical content highlights the difficult position of the Anthropocene spectator, for whom totalizing, distanced views are both a necessity and a trap.","PeriodicalId":517452,"journal":{"name":"Theatre and Performance Notes and Counternotes","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theory on Stage: The Paradox of Anthropocene Spectatorship in Latour and Aït-Touati’s Inside and Moving Earths\",\"authors\":\"Liliane Campos\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/tpnc.1.1.0017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article examines the epistemological dimension of spectatorship in two lecture performances created by philosopher Bruno Latour and theater director Frédérique Aït-Touati. Inside (2016) and Moving Earths (2019) invite their audiences to question how they view the Earth, and to explore new visualizations that may foster political awareness of a “new climate regime.” The scenography and dramaturgy of these lectures perform the disruptions of perspective brought about by Gaia theory, in which the observer must perceive herself as part of an entangled Earth system. The article argues that despite this emphasis on entanglement, the philosopher on stage still functions as a figure of distanced theoretical spectatorship. The resulting tension between the lecture format and its philosophical content highlights the difficult position of the Anthropocene spectator, for whom totalizing, distanced views are both a necessity and a trap.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theatre and Performance Notes and Counternotes\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theatre and Performance Notes and Counternotes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/tpnc.1.1.0017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theatre and Performance Notes and Counternotes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/tpnc.1.1.0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Theory on Stage: The Paradox of Anthropocene Spectatorship in Latour and Aït-Touati’s Inside and Moving Earths
This article examines the epistemological dimension of spectatorship in two lecture performances created by philosopher Bruno Latour and theater director Frédérique Aït-Touati. Inside (2016) and Moving Earths (2019) invite their audiences to question how they view the Earth, and to explore new visualizations that may foster political awareness of a “new climate regime.” The scenography and dramaturgy of these lectures perform the disruptions of perspective brought about by Gaia theory, in which the observer must perceive herself as part of an entangled Earth system. The article argues that despite this emphasis on entanglement, the philosopher on stage still functions as a figure of distanced theoretical spectatorship. The resulting tension between the lecture format and its philosophical content highlights the difficult position of the Anthropocene spectator, for whom totalizing, distanced views are both a necessity and a trap.