预测氮气提升过程中盘绕油管喷嘴出口压力的机器学习模型

S. A. Thabet, Ahmed Ayman El-Hadydy, M. Gabry
{"title":"预测氮气提升过程中盘绕油管喷嘴出口压力的机器学习模型","authors":"S. A. Thabet, Ahmed Ayman El-Hadydy, M. Gabry","doi":"10.2118/218294-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Optimizing bottom hole pressure is crucial for successful nitrogen lifting during clean-out phases after well interventions. Precisely predicting bottom hole pressure is vital for evaluating Inflow performance relationship (IPR) and optimizing operational parameters (e.g., nitrogen injection rate, Run in hole (RIH) speed, and CT depth) in real-time. Multiphase flow around the CT complicates physics-based pressure estimation. This effort aims to develop accurate machine learning models for predicting bottom-hole pressure at the CT nozzle during nitrogen lifting, especially in wells lacking down-hole gauges.\n A machine learning model is developed using readily available parameters typically gathered during nitrogen lifting operations, which include wellhead flowing pressure, wellhead flowing temperature, bottom hole temperature, oil density, water salinity, production rate, water cut percentage, gas-oil ratio, nitrogen rate, gas gravity, and CT depth as inputs. This model is trained utilizing measured bottom-hole pressure data acquired from deployed memory gauges, serving as the model's outputs. Nine distinct machine learning algorithms—Gradient Boosting, AdaBoost, Random Forest, Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Decision Trees, K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Linear Regression, Neural Network, and Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD)—are meticulously developed and fine-tuned utilizing data streams obtained from diverse well operations across 235 wells through data acquisition systems. This dataset is split into two subsets: 80% for training the algorithms and 20% for rigorously testing their predictive capabilities. Two cross-validation processes (K-fold and random sampling) are used to assess the performance of machine learning models.\n The outcomes of the top-performing machine learning models, specifically Gradient Boosting, AdaBoost, Random Forest, SVMs, and Decision Trees, reveal remarkably low mean absolute percent error (MAPE) values when comparing their predictions of coiled tubing (CT) nozzle outlet pressure to actual measurements. These MAPE values stand at 2.1%, 2.7%, 2.8%, 6.6%, and 5%, respectively. Additionally, the correlation coefficients (R2) for these models are notably high, with values of 0.936, 0.906, 0.896, 0.813, and 0.791, respectively. Furthermore, machine learning models offer distinct advantages over conventional vertical lift performance curve correlations, as they do not necessitate routine calibration. Beyond this, these models demonstrated their ability to predict bottom-hole pressure across various operations using data that the models had never encountered during training. Predictions were compared to actual measurements, showing a strong alignment between the model's predictions and real-world bottom-hole pressure data.\n This paper introduces novel insights by demonstrating how using a machine learning model for predicting CT nozzle outlet bottomhole pressure across diverse pumping conditions can enhance ongoing nitrogen lifting operations. Utilizing machine learning models offers a more efficient, rapid, real-time, and cost-effective alternative to calibrated vertical lift performance correlations. Furthermore, these models excel in accommodating a wide spectrum of reservoir fluid characteristics.","PeriodicalId":517791,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, March 20, 2024","volume":"114 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning Models to Predict Pressure at a Coiled Tubing Nozzle's Outlet During Nitrogen Lifting\",\"authors\":\"S. A. Thabet, Ahmed Ayman El-Hadydy, M. Gabry\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/218294-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Optimizing bottom hole pressure is crucial for successful nitrogen lifting during clean-out phases after well interventions. Precisely predicting bottom hole pressure is vital for evaluating Inflow performance relationship (IPR) and optimizing operational parameters (e.g., nitrogen injection rate, Run in hole (RIH) speed, and CT depth) in real-time. Multiphase flow around the CT complicates physics-based pressure estimation. This effort aims to develop accurate machine learning models for predicting bottom-hole pressure at the CT nozzle during nitrogen lifting, especially in wells lacking down-hole gauges.\\n A machine learning model is developed using readily available parameters typically gathered during nitrogen lifting operations, which include wellhead flowing pressure, wellhead flowing temperature, bottom hole temperature, oil density, water salinity, production rate, water cut percentage, gas-oil ratio, nitrogen rate, gas gravity, and CT depth as inputs. This model is trained utilizing measured bottom-hole pressure data acquired from deployed memory gauges, serving as the model's outputs. Nine distinct machine learning algorithms—Gradient Boosting, AdaBoost, Random Forest, Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Decision Trees, K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Linear Regression, Neural Network, and Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD)—are meticulously developed and fine-tuned utilizing data streams obtained from diverse well operations across 235 wells through data acquisition systems. This dataset is split into two subsets: 80% for training the algorithms and 20% for rigorously testing their predictive capabilities. Two cross-validation processes (K-fold and random sampling) are used to assess the performance of machine learning models.\\n The outcomes of the top-performing machine learning models, specifically Gradient Boosting, AdaBoost, Random Forest, SVMs, and Decision Trees, reveal remarkably low mean absolute percent error (MAPE) values when comparing their predictions of coiled tubing (CT) nozzle outlet pressure to actual measurements. These MAPE values stand at 2.1%, 2.7%, 2.8%, 6.6%, and 5%, respectively. Additionally, the correlation coefficients (R2) for these models are notably high, with values of 0.936, 0.906, 0.896, 0.813, and 0.791, respectively. Furthermore, machine learning models offer distinct advantages over conventional vertical lift performance curve correlations, as they do not necessitate routine calibration. Beyond this, these models demonstrated their ability to predict bottom-hole pressure across various operations using data that the models had never encountered during training. Predictions were compared to actual measurements, showing a strong alignment between the model's predictions and real-world bottom-hole pressure data.\\n This paper introduces novel insights by demonstrating how using a machine learning model for predicting CT nozzle outlet bottomhole pressure across diverse pumping conditions can enhance ongoing nitrogen lifting operations. Utilizing machine learning models offers a more efficient, rapid, real-time, and cost-effective alternative to calibrated vertical lift performance correlations. Furthermore, these models excel in accommodating a wide spectrum of reservoir fluid characteristics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Wed, March 20, 2024\",\"volume\":\"114 22\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Wed, March 20, 2024\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/218294-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, March 20, 2024","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/218294-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在油井干预后的清井阶段,优化井底压力对于成功举升氮气至关重要。精确预测井底压力对于实时评估流入性能关系(IPR)和优化作业参数(如氮气注入率、孔内运行(RIH)速度和 CT 深度)至关重要。CT 周围的多相流使基于物理的压力估算变得复杂。这项工作旨在开发精确的机器学习模型,用于预测氮气举升过程中 CT 喷嘴处的井底压力,尤其是在缺乏井下压力计的油井中。机器学习模型是利用通常在氮气举升作业期间收集的现成参数开发的,这些参数包括井口流动压力、井口流动温度、井底温度、油密度、水盐度、生产率、减水百分比、气油比、氮气速率、气体重力和 CT 深度作为输入。该模型利用从部署的存储压力表中获取的井底压力测量数据进行训练,作为模型的输出。九种不同的机器学习算法--梯度提升(Gradient Boosting)、AdaBoost、随机森林(Random Forest)、支持向量机(SVM)、决策树(Decision Trees)、K-最近邻(KNN)、线性回归(Linear Regression)、神经网络(Neural Network)和随机梯度下降(SGD)--都是利用通过数据采集系统从 235 口井的不同油井作业中获取的数据流精心开发和微调的。该数据集分为两个子集:80%用于训练算法,20%用于严格测试算法的预测能力。两个交叉验证过程(K 倍和随机抽样)用于评估机器学习模型的性能。表现最佳的机器学习模型(特别是梯度提升、AdaBoost、随机森林、SVM 和决策树)的结果显示,在将其对盘管 (CT) 喷嘴出口压力的预测与实际测量结果进行比较时,平均绝对百分比误差 (MAPE) 值非常低。这些 MAPE 值分别为 2.1%、2.7%、2.8%、6.6% 和 5%。此外,这些模型的相关系数 (R2) 也非常高,分别为 0.936、0.906、0.896、0.813 和 0.791。此外,与传统的垂直升降性能曲线相关性相比,机器学习模型具有明显的优势,因为它们无需进行常规校准。除此以外,这些模型还证明了它们有能力使用模型在训练过程中从未遇到过的数据来预测各种作业的井底压力。预测结果与实际测量结果进行了比较,结果显示模型预测结果与实际井底压力数据非常吻合。本文通过展示如何使用机器学习模型来预测不同泵送条件下的 CT 喷嘴出口井底压力,从而提高正在进行的氮气提升操作,提出了新颖的见解。利用机器学习模型可以更高效、快速、实时和经济地替代校准的垂直提升性能相关性。此外,这些模型还能很好地适应各种储层流体特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine Learning Models to Predict Pressure at a Coiled Tubing Nozzle's Outlet During Nitrogen Lifting
Optimizing bottom hole pressure is crucial for successful nitrogen lifting during clean-out phases after well interventions. Precisely predicting bottom hole pressure is vital for evaluating Inflow performance relationship (IPR) and optimizing operational parameters (e.g., nitrogen injection rate, Run in hole (RIH) speed, and CT depth) in real-time. Multiphase flow around the CT complicates physics-based pressure estimation. This effort aims to develop accurate machine learning models for predicting bottom-hole pressure at the CT nozzle during nitrogen lifting, especially in wells lacking down-hole gauges. A machine learning model is developed using readily available parameters typically gathered during nitrogen lifting operations, which include wellhead flowing pressure, wellhead flowing temperature, bottom hole temperature, oil density, water salinity, production rate, water cut percentage, gas-oil ratio, nitrogen rate, gas gravity, and CT depth as inputs. This model is trained utilizing measured bottom-hole pressure data acquired from deployed memory gauges, serving as the model's outputs. Nine distinct machine learning algorithms—Gradient Boosting, AdaBoost, Random Forest, Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Decision Trees, K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Linear Regression, Neural Network, and Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD)—are meticulously developed and fine-tuned utilizing data streams obtained from diverse well operations across 235 wells through data acquisition systems. This dataset is split into two subsets: 80% for training the algorithms and 20% for rigorously testing their predictive capabilities. Two cross-validation processes (K-fold and random sampling) are used to assess the performance of machine learning models. The outcomes of the top-performing machine learning models, specifically Gradient Boosting, AdaBoost, Random Forest, SVMs, and Decision Trees, reveal remarkably low mean absolute percent error (MAPE) values when comparing their predictions of coiled tubing (CT) nozzle outlet pressure to actual measurements. These MAPE values stand at 2.1%, 2.7%, 2.8%, 6.6%, and 5%, respectively. Additionally, the correlation coefficients (R2) for these models are notably high, with values of 0.936, 0.906, 0.896, 0.813, and 0.791, respectively. Furthermore, machine learning models offer distinct advantages over conventional vertical lift performance curve correlations, as they do not necessitate routine calibration. Beyond this, these models demonstrated their ability to predict bottom-hole pressure across various operations using data that the models had never encountered during training. Predictions were compared to actual measurements, showing a strong alignment between the model's predictions and real-world bottom-hole pressure data. This paper introduces novel insights by demonstrating how using a machine learning model for predicting CT nozzle outlet bottomhole pressure across diverse pumping conditions can enhance ongoing nitrogen lifting operations. Utilizing machine learning models offers a more efficient, rapid, real-time, and cost-effective alternative to calibrated vertical lift performance correlations. Furthermore, these models excel in accommodating a wide spectrum of reservoir fluid characteristics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信