药剂师主导的尿液药物筛查结果监控流程

Joseph Berendse
{"title":"药剂师主导的尿液药物筛查结果监控流程","authors":"Joseph Berendse","doi":"10.12788/fp.0458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A urine drug screen (UDS) is a common risk-mitigation strategy tool for prescribing controlled substances, particularly opioids. Due to their complexity, UDS results can be misinterpreted and thereby have profound impacts on the patient-clinician relationship. From 2021 to 2022, a clinical dashboard to review potentially discrepant UDS results—based on a comparison of the results to the patient’s medication list— was made available by the Veterans Health Administration. Methods: This quality improvement project implemented a process for weekly clinical pharmacist reviews of the UDS dashboard. Significant discrepant UDS results were reviewed in depth. From June 2022 through September 2022, 700 UDSs were performed and 60 patients had significant discrepancies that warranted in-depth review. Results: Pharmacist interventions during the review included 39 collaborations with medication prescribers to discuss follow up (65%), 25 queries to a prescription drug monitoring program (42%), and 9 confirmatory UDS on the original sample (15%). In-depth reviews were required for about 4 patients weekly, with a mean length of 14 minutes. Conclusions: A pharmacist-led process to monitor discrepant UDS results led to opportunities for collaboration with prescribers and positively impacted confirmatory testing at a rural veterans affairs health system.","PeriodicalId":513268,"journal":{"name":"Federal Practitioner","volume":"138 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pharmacist-Led Process to Monitor Discrepant Urine Drug Screen Results\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Berendse\",\"doi\":\"10.12788/fp.0458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: A urine drug screen (UDS) is a common risk-mitigation strategy tool for prescribing controlled substances, particularly opioids. Due to their complexity, UDS results can be misinterpreted and thereby have profound impacts on the patient-clinician relationship. From 2021 to 2022, a clinical dashboard to review potentially discrepant UDS results—based on a comparison of the results to the patient’s medication list— was made available by the Veterans Health Administration. Methods: This quality improvement project implemented a process for weekly clinical pharmacist reviews of the UDS dashboard. Significant discrepant UDS results were reviewed in depth. From June 2022 through September 2022, 700 UDSs were performed and 60 patients had significant discrepancies that warranted in-depth review. Results: Pharmacist interventions during the review included 39 collaborations with medication prescribers to discuss follow up (65%), 25 queries to a prescription drug monitoring program (42%), and 9 confirmatory UDS on the original sample (15%). In-depth reviews were required for about 4 patients weekly, with a mean length of 14 minutes. Conclusions: A pharmacist-led process to monitor discrepant UDS results led to opportunities for collaboration with prescribers and positively impacted confirmatory testing at a rural veterans affairs health system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":513268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Federal Practitioner\",\"volume\":\"138 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Federal Practitioner\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0458\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal Practitioner","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尿液药物筛查(UDS)是开具受管制药物(尤其是阿片类药物)处方时常用的风险缓解策略工具。由于其复杂性,UDS 结果可能会被误读,从而对患者与医生之间的关系产生深远影响。从 2021 年到 2022 年,退伍军人健康管理局提供了一个临床仪表板,用于根据 UDS 结果与患者用药清单的比较来审查可能存在差异的 UDS 结果。方法:该质量改进项目实施了临床药剂师每周审查 UDS 面板的流程。对存在重大差异的 UDS 结果进行深入审查。从 2022 年 6 月到 2022 年 9 月,共进行了 700 次 UDS,有 60 名患者的 UDS 存在重大差异,需要进行深入审查。审查结果药剂师在审查期间采取的干预措施包括:39 次与用药处方者合作讨论后续治疗(65%),25 次向处方药监控计划查询(42%),9 次对原始样本进行 UDS 确认(15%)。每周需要对约 4 名患者进行深度复查,平均时长为 14 分钟。结论以药剂师为主导的 UDS 差异结果监控流程带来了与处方医生合作的机会,并对农村退伍军人医疗系统的确证检验产生了积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Pharmacist-Led Process to Monitor Discrepant Urine Drug Screen Results
Background: A urine drug screen (UDS) is a common risk-mitigation strategy tool for prescribing controlled substances, particularly opioids. Due to their complexity, UDS results can be misinterpreted and thereby have profound impacts on the patient-clinician relationship. From 2021 to 2022, a clinical dashboard to review potentially discrepant UDS results—based on a comparison of the results to the patient’s medication list— was made available by the Veterans Health Administration. Methods: This quality improvement project implemented a process for weekly clinical pharmacist reviews of the UDS dashboard. Significant discrepant UDS results were reviewed in depth. From June 2022 through September 2022, 700 UDSs were performed and 60 patients had significant discrepancies that warranted in-depth review. Results: Pharmacist interventions during the review included 39 collaborations with medication prescribers to discuss follow up (65%), 25 queries to a prescription drug monitoring program (42%), and 9 confirmatory UDS on the original sample (15%). In-depth reviews were required for about 4 patients weekly, with a mean length of 14 minutes. Conclusions: A pharmacist-led process to monitor discrepant UDS results led to opportunities for collaboration with prescribers and positively impacted confirmatory testing at a rural veterans affairs health system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信