机器人和开腹胃切除术的成本分析

Y. Hirata, Heather Lyu, Ahad M. Azimuddin, Pamela Lu, Jeeva Ajith, Jason A. Schmeisser, Elizabeth P. Ninan, Kyung Hyun Lee, B. Badgwell, Paul F. Mansfield, N. Ikoma
{"title":"机器人和开腹胃切除术的成本分析","authors":"Y. Hirata, Heather Lyu, Ahad M. Azimuddin, Pamela Lu, Jeeva Ajith, Jason A. Schmeisser, Elizabeth P. Ninan, Kyung Hyun Lee, B. Badgwell, Paul F. Mansfield, N. Ikoma","doi":"10.1097/as9.0000000000000396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n To determine the magnitude of the perioperative costs associated with robotic gastrectomy (RG).\n \n \n \n A robotic surgery platform has a high implementation cost and requires maintenance costs; however, whether the overall cost of RG, including all perioperative costs, is higher than conventional open gastrectomy (OG) remains unknown.\n \n \n \n Patients who underwent a major gastrectomy during February 2018 through December 2021 were retrospectively identified. We calculated the perioperative costs of RG and OG and compared them overall as well as in different phases, including intraoperative costs and 30-day postsurgery inpatient and outpatient costs. We investigated factors potentially associated with high cost and estimated the likelihood of RG to reduce overall cost under a Bayesian framework. All cost data were converted to ratios to the average cost of all operations performed at our center in year FY2021.\n \n \n \n We identified 119 patients who underwent gastrectomy. The incidence of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo >IIIa; RG, 10% vs OG, 13%) did not significantly differ between approaches. The median length of stay was 3 days shorter for RG versus OG (4 vs 7 days, P < 0.001). Intraoperative cost ratios were significantly higher for RG (RG, 2.6 vs OG, 1.7; P < 0.001). However, postoperative hospitalization cost ratios were significantly lower for RG (RG, 2.8 vs OG, 3.9; P < 0.001). Total perioperative cost ratios were similar between groups (RG, 6.1 vs OG, 6.4; P = 0.534). The multiple Bayesian generalized linear analysis showed RG had 76.5% posterior probability of overall perioperative cost reduction (adjusted risk ratio of 0.95; 95% credible interval, 0.85–1.07).\n \n \n \n Despite increased intraoperative costs, total perioperative costs in the RG group were similar to those in the OG group because of reduced postoperative hospitalization costs.\n","PeriodicalId":503165,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgery Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost Analysis for Robotic and Open Gastrectomy\",\"authors\":\"Y. Hirata, Heather Lyu, Ahad M. Azimuddin, Pamela Lu, Jeeva Ajith, Jason A. Schmeisser, Elizabeth P. Ninan, Kyung Hyun Lee, B. Badgwell, Paul F. Mansfield, N. Ikoma\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/as9.0000000000000396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n To determine the magnitude of the perioperative costs associated with robotic gastrectomy (RG).\\n \\n \\n \\n A robotic surgery platform has a high implementation cost and requires maintenance costs; however, whether the overall cost of RG, including all perioperative costs, is higher than conventional open gastrectomy (OG) remains unknown.\\n \\n \\n \\n Patients who underwent a major gastrectomy during February 2018 through December 2021 were retrospectively identified. We calculated the perioperative costs of RG and OG and compared them overall as well as in different phases, including intraoperative costs and 30-day postsurgery inpatient and outpatient costs. We investigated factors potentially associated with high cost and estimated the likelihood of RG to reduce overall cost under a Bayesian framework. All cost data were converted to ratios to the average cost of all operations performed at our center in year FY2021.\\n \\n \\n \\n We identified 119 patients who underwent gastrectomy. The incidence of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo >IIIa; RG, 10% vs OG, 13%) did not significantly differ between approaches. The median length of stay was 3 days shorter for RG versus OG (4 vs 7 days, P < 0.001). Intraoperative cost ratios were significantly higher for RG (RG, 2.6 vs OG, 1.7; P < 0.001). However, postoperative hospitalization cost ratios were significantly lower for RG (RG, 2.8 vs OG, 3.9; P < 0.001). Total perioperative cost ratios were similar between groups (RG, 6.1 vs OG, 6.4; P = 0.534). The multiple Bayesian generalized linear analysis showed RG had 76.5% posterior probability of overall perioperative cost reduction (adjusted risk ratio of 0.95; 95% credible interval, 0.85–1.07).\\n \\n \\n \\n Despite increased intraoperative costs, total perioperative costs in the RG group were similar to those in the OG group because of reduced postoperative hospitalization costs.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":503165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgery Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgery Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000396\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgery Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定与机器人胃切除术(RG)相关的围手术期成本的规模。 机器人手术平台的实施成本很高,并且需要维护成本;然而,机器人胃切除术的总体成本(包括所有围手术期成本)是否高于传统的开腹胃切除术(OG)仍是未知数。 我们对 2018 年 2 月至 2021 年 12 月期间接受胃大部切除术的患者进行了回顾性鉴定。我们计算了RG和OG的围手术期成本,并对两者的总体成本以及不同阶段的成本进行了比较,包括术中成本和术后30天的住院和门诊成本。我们研究了可能与高成本相关的因素,并在贝叶斯框架下估计了 RG 降低总体成本的可能性。我们将所有成本数据转换为 2021 财年本中心所有手术平均成本的比率。 我们确定了 119 名接受胃切除术的患者。不同方法的术后并发症发生率(Clavien-Dindo >IIIa;RG,10% vs OG,13%)无显著差异。RG 与 OG 相比,中位住院时间缩短了 3 天(4 天 vs 7 天,P < 0.001)。RG 的术中成本比明显更高(RG 2.6 vs OG 1.7;P < 0.001)。但是,RG 的术后住院费用比明显较低(RG,2.8 vs OG,3.9;P <0.001)。两组的围手术期总成本比相似(RG,6.1 vs OG,6.4;P = 0.534)。多重贝叶斯广义线性分析显示,RG 有 76.5% 的后验概率使围手术期总成本降低(调整风险比为 0.95;95% 可信区间为 0.85-1.07)。 尽管术中费用增加,但由于术后住院费用减少,RG 组的围手术期总费用与 OG 组相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost Analysis for Robotic and Open Gastrectomy
To determine the magnitude of the perioperative costs associated with robotic gastrectomy (RG). A robotic surgery platform has a high implementation cost and requires maintenance costs; however, whether the overall cost of RG, including all perioperative costs, is higher than conventional open gastrectomy (OG) remains unknown. Patients who underwent a major gastrectomy during February 2018 through December 2021 were retrospectively identified. We calculated the perioperative costs of RG and OG and compared them overall as well as in different phases, including intraoperative costs and 30-day postsurgery inpatient and outpatient costs. We investigated factors potentially associated with high cost and estimated the likelihood of RG to reduce overall cost under a Bayesian framework. All cost data were converted to ratios to the average cost of all operations performed at our center in year FY2021. We identified 119 patients who underwent gastrectomy. The incidence of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo >IIIa; RG, 10% vs OG, 13%) did not significantly differ between approaches. The median length of stay was 3 days shorter for RG versus OG (4 vs 7 days, P < 0.001). Intraoperative cost ratios were significantly higher for RG (RG, 2.6 vs OG, 1.7; P < 0.001). However, postoperative hospitalization cost ratios were significantly lower for RG (RG, 2.8 vs OG, 3.9; P < 0.001). Total perioperative cost ratios were similar between groups (RG, 6.1 vs OG, 6.4; P = 0.534). The multiple Bayesian generalized linear analysis showed RG had 76.5% posterior probability of overall perioperative cost reduction (adjusted risk ratio of 0.95; 95% credible interval, 0.85–1.07). Despite increased intraoperative costs, total perioperative costs in the RG group were similar to those in the OG group because of reduced postoperative hospitalization costs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信