根据锥形束图像生成基于深度学习的盆腔合成计算机断层扫描的最小成像剂量

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Yan Chi Ivy Chan , Minglun Li , Adrian Thummerer , Katia Parodi , Claus Belka , Christopher Kurz , Guillaume Landry
{"title":"根据锥形束图像生成基于深度学习的盆腔合成计算机断层扫描的最小成像剂量","authors":"Yan Chi Ivy Chan ,&nbsp;Minglun Li ,&nbsp;Adrian Thummerer ,&nbsp;Katia Parodi ,&nbsp;Claus Belka ,&nbsp;Christopher Kurz ,&nbsp;Guillaume Landry","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in image-guided radiotherapy administers radiation exposure and subjects patients to secondary cancer risk. Reducing imaging dose remains challenging as image quality deteriorates. We investigated three imaging dose levels by reducing projections and correcting images using two deep learning algorithms, aiming at identifying the lowest achievable imaging dose.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>CBCTs were reconstructed with 100%, 25%, 15% and 10% projections. Models were trained (30), validated (3) and tested (8) with prostate cancer patient datasets. We optimized and compared the performance of 1) a cycle generative adversarial network (cycleGAN) with residual connection and 2) a contrastive unpaired translation network (CUT) to generate synthetic computed tomography (sCT) from reduced imaging dose CBCTs. Volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were optimized on a reference intensity-corrected full dose CBCT<sub>cor</sub> and recalculated on sCTs. Hounsfield unit (HU) and positioning accuracy were evaluated. Bladder and rectum were manually delineated to determine anatomical fidelity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All sCTs achieved average mean absolute mean absolute error/structural similarity index measure/peak signal-to-noise ratio of <span><math><mrow><mo>⩽</mo></mrow></math></span>59HU/<span><math><mrow><mo>⩾</mo></mrow></math></span>0.94/<span><math><mrow><mo>⩾</mo></mrow></math></span>33 dB. All dose-volume histogram parameter differences were within 2 Gy or 2<span><math><mrow><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span>. Positioning differences were <span><math><mrow><mo>⩽</mo></mrow></math></span>0.30 mm or 0.30°. cycleGAN with Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) for bladder/rectum of <span><math><mrow><mo>⩾</mo></mrow></math></span>0.85/<span><math><mrow><mo>⩾</mo></mrow></math></span>0.81 performed better than CUT (<span><math><mrow><mo>⩾</mo></mrow></math></span>0.83/<span><math><mrow><mo>⩾</mo></mrow></math></span>0.76). A significantly lower DSC accuracy was observed for 15<span><math><mrow><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span> and 10<span><math><mrow><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span> sCTs. cycleGAN performed better than CUT for contouring, however both yielded comparable outcomes in other evaluations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>sCTs based on different CBCT doses using cycleGAN and CUT were investigated. Based on segmentation accuracy, 25<span><math><mrow><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span> is the minimum imaging dose.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000393/pdfft?md5=452ad846baea997c6e88892e1c54bf7e&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000393-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimum imaging dose for deep learning-based pelvic synthetic computed tomography generation from cone beam images\",\"authors\":\"Yan Chi Ivy Chan ,&nbsp;Minglun Li ,&nbsp;Adrian Thummerer ,&nbsp;Katia Parodi ,&nbsp;Claus Belka ,&nbsp;Christopher Kurz ,&nbsp;Guillaume Landry\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100569\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in image-guided radiotherapy administers radiation exposure and subjects patients to secondary cancer risk. Reducing imaging dose remains challenging as image quality deteriorates. We investigated three imaging dose levels by reducing projections and correcting images using two deep learning algorithms, aiming at identifying the lowest achievable imaging dose.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>CBCTs were reconstructed with 100%, 25%, 15% and 10% projections. Models were trained (30), validated (3) and tested (8) with prostate cancer patient datasets. We optimized and compared the performance of 1) a cycle generative adversarial network (cycleGAN) with residual connection and 2) a contrastive unpaired translation network (CUT) to generate synthetic computed tomography (sCT) from reduced imaging dose CBCTs. Volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were optimized on a reference intensity-corrected full dose CBCT<sub>cor</sub> and recalculated on sCTs. Hounsfield unit (HU) and positioning accuracy were evaluated. Bladder and rectum were manually delineated to determine anatomical fidelity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All sCTs achieved average mean absolute mean absolute error/structural similarity index measure/peak signal-to-noise ratio of <span><math><mrow><mo>⩽</mo></mrow></math></span>59HU/<span><math><mrow><mo>⩾</mo></mrow></math></span>0.94/<span><math><mrow><mo>⩾</mo></mrow></math></span>33 dB. All dose-volume histogram parameter differences were within 2 Gy or 2<span><math><mrow><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span>. Positioning differences were <span><math><mrow><mo>⩽</mo></mrow></math></span>0.30 mm or 0.30°. cycleGAN with Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) for bladder/rectum of <span><math><mrow><mo>⩾</mo></mrow></math></span>0.85/<span><math><mrow><mo>⩾</mo></mrow></math></span>0.81 performed better than CUT (<span><math><mrow><mo>⩾</mo></mrow></math></span>0.83/<span><math><mrow><mo>⩾</mo></mrow></math></span>0.76). A significantly lower DSC accuracy was observed for 15<span><math><mrow><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span> and 10<span><math><mrow><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span> sCTs. cycleGAN performed better than CUT for contouring, however both yielded comparable outcomes in other evaluations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>sCTs based on different CBCT doses using cycleGAN and CUT were investigated. Based on segmentation accuracy, 25<span><math><mrow><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span> is the minimum imaging dose.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000393/pdfft?md5=452ad846baea997c6e88892e1c54bf7e&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000393-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000393\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的图像引导放射治疗中的锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)每天都会造成辐射照射,并使患者面临二次癌症风险。随着图像质量的下降,降低成像剂量仍具有挑战性。我们使用两种深度学习算法,通过减少投影和校正图像,研究了三种成像剂量水平,旨在确定可实现的最低成像剂量。使用前列腺癌患者数据集对模型进行了训练(30 个)、验证(3 个)和测试(8 个)。我们优化并比较了 1) 带有残余连接的循环生成对抗网络 (cycleGAN) 和 2) 对比非配对翻译网络 (CUT) 的性能,以便从成像剂量降低的 CBCT 生成合成计算机断层扫描 (sCT)。在参考强度校正的全剂量 CBCTcor 上优化了容积调制弧治疗计划,并在 sCT 上进行了重新计算。对霍斯菲尔德单位(HU)和定位精度进行了评估。结果所有 sCT 的平均绝对平均误差/结构相似性指数测量/峰值信噪比均为⩽59HU/⩾0.94/⩾33 dB。所有剂量-容积直方图参数差异均在 2 Gy 或 2% 以内。cycleGAN的膀胱/直肠戴斯相似系数(DSC)为⩾0.85/⩾0.81,表现优于CUT(⩾0.83/⩾0.76)。cycleGAN 的轮廓处理效果优于 CUT,但两者在其他评估中的结果相当。根据分割的准确性,25% 是最小的成像剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Minimum imaging dose for deep learning-based pelvic synthetic computed tomography generation from cone beam images

Minimum imaging dose for deep learning-based pelvic synthetic computed tomography generation from cone beam images

Background and purpose

Daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in image-guided radiotherapy administers radiation exposure and subjects patients to secondary cancer risk. Reducing imaging dose remains challenging as image quality deteriorates. We investigated three imaging dose levels by reducing projections and correcting images using two deep learning algorithms, aiming at identifying the lowest achievable imaging dose.

Materials and methods

CBCTs were reconstructed with 100%, 25%, 15% and 10% projections. Models were trained (30), validated (3) and tested (8) with prostate cancer patient datasets. We optimized and compared the performance of 1) a cycle generative adversarial network (cycleGAN) with residual connection and 2) a contrastive unpaired translation network (CUT) to generate synthetic computed tomography (sCT) from reduced imaging dose CBCTs. Volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were optimized on a reference intensity-corrected full dose CBCTcor and recalculated on sCTs. Hounsfield unit (HU) and positioning accuracy were evaluated. Bladder and rectum were manually delineated to determine anatomical fidelity.

Results

All sCTs achieved average mean absolute mean absolute error/structural similarity index measure/peak signal-to-noise ratio of 59HU/0.94/33 dB. All dose-volume histogram parameter differences were within 2 Gy or 2%. Positioning differences were 0.30 mm or 0.30°. cycleGAN with Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) for bladder/rectum of 0.85/0.81 performed better than CUT (0.83/0.76). A significantly lower DSC accuracy was observed for 15% and 10% sCTs. cycleGAN performed better than CUT for contouring, however both yielded comparable outcomes in other evaluations.

Conclusion

sCTs based on different CBCT doses using cycleGAN and CUT were investigated. Based on segmentation accuracy, 25% is the minimum imaging dose.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信