使用便携式超低场(0.064T)磁共振成像技术对人工耳蜗进行成像:金属图像伪影与传统固定式 3T 磁共振成像的比较

C. C. Munhall, Donna R. Roberts, Robert F. Labadie
{"title":"使用便携式超低场(0.064T)磁共振成像技术对人工耳蜗进行成像:金属图像伪影与传统固定式 3T 磁共振成像的比较","authors":"C. C. Munhall, Donna R. Roberts, Robert F. Labadie","doi":"10.1097/ono.0000000000000049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n To assess image artifact when imaging a cochlear implant (CI) with a conventional 3T MRI machine compared with a very low-field (0.064T) MRI.\n \n \n \n None.\n \n \n \n Diagnostic study.\n \n \n \n Image artifact size associated with the CI affixed to an MRI phantom at very low-field 0.064T MRI versus 3T MRI.\n \n \n \n The longest diameter of the image artifact was 125 mm for the 3T MRI and 86 mm for the 0.064T MRI, representing 45% longer image artifact generated in the 3T MRI. The actual volume of the imaging phantom was 1371 cm3. The volume of the image artifact was measured as 379 cm3 in the 3T MRI, representing a loss of 27.6% of the actual volume of the imaging phantom. The volume of image artifact was measured as 170 cm3 in the 0.064T MRI, representing a loss of 12.4% of the phantom volume.\n \n \n \n 3T MRI had better image quality. This result was not surprising given that larger magnetic field strength is known to provide higher resolution. There was 15% less image artifact generated in the very low-field MRI machine compared with a conventional 3T device. And there was also subjectively increased distortion of the imaging phantom at 3T MRI compared with the 0.064T MRI. With minimized safety concerns and a much lower cost than conventional 3T machines, very low-field scanners may find expanded clinical uses. This preclinical study explores the potential utility of very low-field MRI in scanning CI recipients.\n","PeriodicalId":124165,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology Open","volume":"137 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of Portable, Very Low-field (0.064T) MRI to Image Cochlear Implants: Metallic Image Artifact in Comparison to Traditional, Stationary 3T MRI\",\"authors\":\"C. C. Munhall, Donna R. Roberts, Robert F. Labadie\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ono.0000000000000049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n To assess image artifact when imaging a cochlear implant (CI) with a conventional 3T MRI machine compared with a very low-field (0.064T) MRI.\\n \\n \\n \\n None.\\n \\n \\n \\n Diagnostic study.\\n \\n \\n \\n Image artifact size associated with the CI affixed to an MRI phantom at very low-field 0.064T MRI versus 3T MRI.\\n \\n \\n \\n The longest diameter of the image artifact was 125 mm for the 3T MRI and 86 mm for the 0.064T MRI, representing 45% longer image artifact generated in the 3T MRI. The actual volume of the imaging phantom was 1371 cm3. The volume of the image artifact was measured as 379 cm3 in the 3T MRI, representing a loss of 27.6% of the actual volume of the imaging phantom. The volume of image artifact was measured as 170 cm3 in the 0.064T MRI, representing a loss of 12.4% of the phantom volume.\\n \\n \\n \\n 3T MRI had better image quality. This result was not surprising given that larger magnetic field strength is known to provide higher resolution. There was 15% less image artifact generated in the very low-field MRI machine compared with a conventional 3T device. And there was also subjectively increased distortion of the imaging phantom at 3T MRI compared with the 0.064T MRI. With minimized safety concerns and a much lower cost than conventional 3T machines, very low-field scanners may find expanded clinical uses. This preclinical study explores the potential utility of very low-field MRI in scanning CI recipients.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":124165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology Open\",\"volume\":\"137 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ono.0000000000000049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ono.0000000000000049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与超低场强(0.064T)磁共振成像仪相比,评估使用传统 3T 磁共振成像仪对人工耳蜗(CI)成像时的图像伪影。 无。 诊断研究。 在极低磁场 0.064T 磁共振成像与 3T 磁共振成像中,与贴在磁共振成像模型上的 CI 相关的图像伪影尺寸。 3T 磁共振成像的图像伪影最长直径为 125 毫米,而 0.064T 磁共振成像的图像伪影最长直径为 86 毫米,3T 磁共振成像产生的图像伪影长 45%。成像模型的实际体积为 1371 立方厘米。在 3T 磁共振成像中测得的图像伪影体积为 379 立方厘米,占成像模型实际体积的 27.6%。在 0.064T 磁共振成像中测量到的图像伪影体积为 170 立方厘米,占成像模型体积的 12.4%。 3T 磁共振成像的图像质量更好。鉴于更大的磁场强度可提供更高的分辨率,这一结果并不令人意外。与传统的 3T 设备相比,超低磁场 MRI 设备产生的图像伪影减少了 15%。与 0.064T 磁共振成像仪相比,3T 磁共振成像仪成像模型的主观失真也有所增加。与传统的 3T 设备相比,超低磁场扫描仪的安全问题最小,成本更低,可能会在临床上得到更广泛的应用。这项临床前研究探讨了超低场磁共振成像在扫描 CI 受体中的潜在用途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Use of Portable, Very Low-field (0.064T) MRI to Image Cochlear Implants: Metallic Image Artifact in Comparison to Traditional, Stationary 3T MRI
To assess image artifact when imaging a cochlear implant (CI) with a conventional 3T MRI machine compared with a very low-field (0.064T) MRI. None. Diagnostic study. Image artifact size associated with the CI affixed to an MRI phantom at very low-field 0.064T MRI versus 3T MRI. The longest diameter of the image artifact was 125 mm for the 3T MRI and 86 mm for the 0.064T MRI, representing 45% longer image artifact generated in the 3T MRI. The actual volume of the imaging phantom was 1371 cm3. The volume of the image artifact was measured as 379 cm3 in the 3T MRI, representing a loss of 27.6% of the actual volume of the imaging phantom. The volume of image artifact was measured as 170 cm3 in the 0.064T MRI, representing a loss of 12.4% of the phantom volume. 3T MRI had better image quality. This result was not surprising given that larger magnetic field strength is known to provide higher resolution. There was 15% less image artifact generated in the very low-field MRI machine compared with a conventional 3T device. And there was also subjectively increased distortion of the imaging phantom at 3T MRI compared with the 0.064T MRI. With minimized safety concerns and a much lower cost than conventional 3T machines, very low-field scanners may find expanded clinical uses. This preclinical study explores the potential utility of very low-field MRI in scanning CI recipients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信