基于腺瘤的 45 至 49 岁军人结肠镜检查质量标准

IF 1.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
{"title":"基于腺瘤的 45 至 49 岁军人结肠镜检查质量标准","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2024.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND AND AIMS</h3><p><span>With the rising incidence of colorectal cancer in younger individuals, guidelines now recommend initiating average-risk screening at age 45 years. We sought to assess the impact of this younger screening population on established and emerging </span>colonoscopy quality metrics.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>We compared all well-described lesion detection rates by colonic segment removed during initial, average-risk screening colonoscopies in the San Antonio Market military healthcare network from July 2019 to September 2022.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p><span>A total of 2165 colonoscopies met the inclusion criteria, with 755 (34.9%) colonoscopies performed on patients aged 45-49 years old. The detection rates for adenomas<span>, proximal adenomas, advanced adenomas, and adenomas per colonoscopy were lower in the 45-49 years old group (33.4%, 18.7%, 3.8%, and 0.58, respectively) compared with the 50-75 years old group (42.7%, 24.2%, 7.7%, and 1.11, respectively; all </span></span><em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). There was no difference in serrated polyp detection in the 45-49 years old group (11.5%) compared with the 50-75 years old group (12.5%; <em>P</em><span> = 0.287). There were no differences in withdrawal times, cecal intubation<span> rates, or bowel preparation adequacy across age groups.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><p>In our screening population, we found that adenoma-based colonoscopy quality metrics were significantly lower in the 45-49 years old population compared to the traditional screening age cohort, while there was no difference in serrated polyp detection. Endoscopists should anticipate a small decline in colonoscopy quality benchmarks as the screening population becomes younger, although these results require validation through multicenter, prospective monitoring.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36169,"journal":{"name":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adenoma-Based Colonoscopy Quality Metrics for the 45–49 Years Old Military Screening Population\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tige.2024.02.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>BACKGROUND AND AIMS</h3><p><span>With the rising incidence of colorectal cancer in younger individuals, guidelines now recommend initiating average-risk screening at age 45 years. We sought to assess the impact of this younger screening population on established and emerging </span>colonoscopy quality metrics.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>We compared all well-described lesion detection rates by colonic segment removed during initial, average-risk screening colonoscopies in the San Antonio Market military healthcare network from July 2019 to September 2022.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p><span>A total of 2165 colonoscopies met the inclusion criteria, with 755 (34.9%) colonoscopies performed on patients aged 45-49 years old. The detection rates for adenomas<span>, proximal adenomas, advanced adenomas, and adenomas per colonoscopy were lower in the 45-49 years old group (33.4%, 18.7%, 3.8%, and 0.58, respectively) compared with the 50-75 years old group (42.7%, 24.2%, 7.7%, and 1.11, respectively; all </span></span><em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). There was no difference in serrated polyp detection in the 45-49 years old group (11.5%) compared with the 50-75 years old group (12.5%; <em>P</em><span> = 0.287). There were no differences in withdrawal times, cecal intubation<span> rates, or bowel preparation adequacy across age groups.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><p>In our screening population, we found that adenoma-based colonoscopy quality metrics were significantly lower in the 45-49 years old population compared to the traditional screening age cohort, while there was no difference in serrated polyp detection. Endoscopists should anticipate a small decline in colonoscopy quality benchmarks as the screening population becomes younger, although these results require validation through multicenter, prospective monitoring.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259003072400014X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259003072400014X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的随着年轻人结直肠癌发病率的上升,现在的指南建议在 45 岁开始进行平均风险筛查。我们试图评估这一年轻筛查人群对既有和新出现的结肠镜检查质量指标的影响。方法我们比较了 2019 年 7 月至 2022 年 9 月期间圣安东尼奥市场军事医疗保健网络中初始、平均风险筛查结肠镜检查中按切除结肠段划分的所有明确描述的病变检出率。结果共有 2165 例结肠镜检查符合纳入标准,其中 755 例(34.9%)结肠镜检查针对 45-49 岁的患者。与 50-75 岁年龄组(分别为 42.7%、24.2%、7.7% 和 1.11;均为 P < 0.05)相比,45-49 岁年龄组的腺瘤、近端腺瘤、晚期腺瘤和腺瘤每次结肠镜检查的检出率较低(分别为 33.4%、18.7%、3.8% 和 0.58)。45-49 岁组的锯齿状息肉检出率(11.5%)与 50-75 岁组(12.5%;P = 0.287)相比没有差异。结论 在我们的筛查人群中,我们发现与传统筛查年龄组相比,45-49 岁人群基于腺瘤的结肠镜检查质量指标明显较低,而锯齿状息肉的检出率则没有差异。尽管这些结果需要通过多中心、前瞻性监测来验证,但内镜医师应预计随着筛查人群的年轻化,结肠镜检查质量基准会略有下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adenoma-Based Colonoscopy Quality Metrics for the 45–49 Years Old Military Screening Population

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

With the rising incidence of colorectal cancer in younger individuals, guidelines now recommend initiating average-risk screening at age 45 years. We sought to assess the impact of this younger screening population on established and emerging colonoscopy quality metrics.

METHODS

We compared all well-described lesion detection rates by colonic segment removed during initial, average-risk screening colonoscopies in the San Antonio Market military healthcare network from July 2019 to September 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 2165 colonoscopies met the inclusion criteria, with 755 (34.9%) colonoscopies performed on patients aged 45-49 years old. The detection rates for adenomas, proximal adenomas, advanced adenomas, and adenomas per colonoscopy were lower in the 45-49 years old group (33.4%, 18.7%, 3.8%, and 0.58, respectively) compared with the 50-75 years old group (42.7%, 24.2%, 7.7%, and 1.11, respectively; all P < 0.05). There was no difference in serrated polyp detection in the 45-49 years old group (11.5%) compared with the 50-75 years old group (12.5%; P = 0.287). There were no differences in withdrawal times, cecal intubation rates, or bowel preparation adequacy across age groups.

CONCLUSION

In our screening population, we found that adenoma-based colonoscopy quality metrics were significantly lower in the 45-49 years old population compared to the traditional screening age cohort, while there was no difference in serrated polyp detection. Endoscopists should anticipate a small decline in colonoscopy quality benchmarks as the screening population becomes younger, although these results require validation through multicenter, prospective monitoring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信