{"title":"预测早期人工耳蜗植入效果:认知测试有用吗?","authors":"Natalie Schauwecker, Terrin N. Tamati, A. Moberly","doi":"10.1097/ono.0000000000000050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n There is significant variability in speech recognition outcomes in adults who receive cochlear implants (CIs). Little is known regarding cognitive influences on very early CI performance, during which significant neural plasticity occurs.\n \n \n \n Prospective study of 15 postlingually deafened adult CI candidates tested preoperatively with a battery of cognitive assessments. The mini-mental state exam (MMSE), forward digit span, Stroop measure of inhibition-concentration, and test of word reading efficiency were utilized to assess cognition. consonant-nucleus-consonant words, AZBio sentences in quiet, and AZBio sentences in noise (+10 dB SNR) were utilized to assess speech recognition at 1- and 3-months of CI use.\n \n \n \n Performance in all speech measures at 1-month was moderately correlated with preoperative MMSE, but these correlations were not strongly correlated after correcting for multiple comparisons. There were large correlations of forward digit span with 1-month AzBio quiet (P ≤ 0.001, rho = 0.762) and AzBio noise (P ≤ 0.001, rho = 0.860), both of which were strong after correction. At 3 months, forward digit span was strongly predictive of AzBio noise (P ≤ 0.001, rho = 0.786), which was strongly correlated after correction. Changes in speech recognition scores were not correlated with preoperative cognitive test scores.\n \n \n \n Working memory capacity significantly predicted early CI sentence recognition performance in our small cohort, while other cognitive functions assessed did not. These results differ from prior studies predicting longer-term outcomes. Findings and further studies may lead to better preoperative counseling and help identify patients who require closer evaluation to ensure optimal CI performance.\n","PeriodicalId":124165,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology Open","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Early Cochlear Implant Performance: Can Cognitive Testing Help?\",\"authors\":\"Natalie Schauwecker, Terrin N. Tamati, A. Moberly\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ono.0000000000000050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n There is significant variability in speech recognition outcomes in adults who receive cochlear implants (CIs). Little is known regarding cognitive influences on very early CI performance, during which significant neural plasticity occurs.\\n \\n \\n \\n Prospective study of 15 postlingually deafened adult CI candidates tested preoperatively with a battery of cognitive assessments. The mini-mental state exam (MMSE), forward digit span, Stroop measure of inhibition-concentration, and test of word reading efficiency were utilized to assess cognition. consonant-nucleus-consonant words, AZBio sentences in quiet, and AZBio sentences in noise (+10 dB SNR) were utilized to assess speech recognition at 1- and 3-months of CI use.\\n \\n \\n \\n Performance in all speech measures at 1-month was moderately correlated with preoperative MMSE, but these correlations were not strongly correlated after correcting for multiple comparisons. There were large correlations of forward digit span with 1-month AzBio quiet (P ≤ 0.001, rho = 0.762) and AzBio noise (P ≤ 0.001, rho = 0.860), both of which were strong after correction. At 3 months, forward digit span was strongly predictive of AzBio noise (P ≤ 0.001, rho = 0.786), which was strongly correlated after correction. Changes in speech recognition scores were not correlated with preoperative cognitive test scores.\\n \\n \\n \\n Working memory capacity significantly predicted early CI sentence recognition performance in our small cohort, while other cognitive functions assessed did not. These results differ from prior studies predicting longer-term outcomes. Findings and further studies may lead to better preoperative counseling and help identify patients who require closer evaluation to ensure optimal CI performance.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":124165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology Open\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ono.0000000000000050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ono.0000000000000050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
接受人工耳蜗(CI)的成年人在语音识别结果方面存在很大差异。人们对早期 CI 性能的认知影响知之甚少,而在此期间神经系统会发生显著的可塑性。 我们对 15 名舌后失聪的成年 CI 候选者进行了前瞻性研究,他们在术前接受了一系列认知评估测试。在使用 CI 1 个月和 3 个月时,辅音-核-共振词、AZBio 句子(安静时)和 AZBio 句子(噪音时(+10 dB SNR))被用来评估语音识别能力。 使用人工耳蜗 1 个月时的所有语音测试成绩与术前 MMSE 值呈中度相关,但经多重比较校正后,这些相关性并不强。前向数字跨度与 1 个月的 AzBio 安静(P ≤ 0.001,rho = 0.762)和 AzBio 噪音(P ≤ 0.001,rho = 0.860)有很大的相关性,校正后两者都很强。3 个月时,前向数字跨度对 AzBio 噪音有很强的预测性(P ≤ 0.001,rho = 0.786),校正后两者有很强的相关性。语音识别得分的变化与术前认知测试得分无关。 在我们的小规模队列中,工作记忆能力对早期 CI 句子识别能力有明显的预测作用,而其他认知功能评估结果则没有。这些结果与之前预测长期结果的研究不同。这些发现和进一步的研究可能会带来更好的术前咨询,并有助于确定哪些患者需要更仔细的评估,以确保 CI 达到最佳效果。
Predicting Early Cochlear Implant Performance: Can Cognitive Testing Help?
There is significant variability in speech recognition outcomes in adults who receive cochlear implants (CIs). Little is known regarding cognitive influences on very early CI performance, during which significant neural plasticity occurs.
Prospective study of 15 postlingually deafened adult CI candidates tested preoperatively with a battery of cognitive assessments. The mini-mental state exam (MMSE), forward digit span, Stroop measure of inhibition-concentration, and test of word reading efficiency were utilized to assess cognition. consonant-nucleus-consonant words, AZBio sentences in quiet, and AZBio sentences in noise (+10 dB SNR) were utilized to assess speech recognition at 1- and 3-months of CI use.
Performance in all speech measures at 1-month was moderately correlated with preoperative MMSE, but these correlations were not strongly correlated after correcting for multiple comparisons. There were large correlations of forward digit span with 1-month AzBio quiet (P ≤ 0.001, rho = 0.762) and AzBio noise (P ≤ 0.001, rho = 0.860), both of which were strong after correction. At 3 months, forward digit span was strongly predictive of AzBio noise (P ≤ 0.001, rho = 0.786), which was strongly correlated after correction. Changes in speech recognition scores were not correlated with preoperative cognitive test scores.
Working memory capacity significantly predicted early CI sentence recognition performance in our small cohort, while other cognitive functions assessed did not. These results differ from prior studies predicting longer-term outcomes. Findings and further studies may lead to better preoperative counseling and help identify patients who require closer evaluation to ensure optimal CI performance.