肺癌切除术周围服务利用的地域差异

{"title":"肺癌切除术周围服务利用的地域差异","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.atssr.2024.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>As value-based care models continue to gain emphasis, along with the need for improved profiling across the continuum of lung cancer care, a better understanding of geographic variation in utilization of services surrounding episodes of care is needed.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing lung cancer resection from 2017 to 2019, we examined geographic variation in utilization of services surrounding episodes of lung cancer resection. We utilized hierarchical logistic regression models to determine risk-adjusted utilization of services. This study utilized inpatient and ambulatory databases across 4 states: New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Florida, and Maryland. All patients undergoing lung cancer resection were included. The primary outcome was risk-adjusted utilization of services.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean risk-adjusted utilization of ambulatory procedures across all hospital referral regions (HRRs) was 34.1% (95% CI 30.7%-37.6%), while the individual HRR utilization varied from 10.9% to 54.9% (<em>P</em> &lt; .01). Mean risk-adjusted utilization of inpatient admissions in the 6 months prior to surgery was 15.3% (95% CI 13.9%-16.7%), ranging from 7.4% to 24.7% (<em>P</em> = .07) across HRRs. Finally, mean risk-adjusted utilization of inpatient hospitalizations in the 6 months following surgery was 19.4% (95% CI 17.7-21.0%), ranging from 10.0% to 33.6% (<em>P</em> = .19) across HRRs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Overall, we observed that utilization of ambulatory services varied significantly across HRRs, while inpatient utilization did not demonstrate significant variation. Given these findings, there may be geographic drivers of variation in the utilization of services surrounding lung cancer resection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72234,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124001104/pdfft?md5=1591b6643128a670ccf177b50929efcd&pid=1-s2.0-S2772993124001104-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geographic Variation in the Utilization of Services Surrounding Lung Cancer Resection\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.atssr.2024.02.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>As value-based care models continue to gain emphasis, along with the need for improved profiling across the continuum of lung cancer care, a better understanding of geographic variation in utilization of services surrounding episodes of care is needed.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing lung cancer resection from 2017 to 2019, we examined geographic variation in utilization of services surrounding episodes of lung cancer resection. We utilized hierarchical logistic regression models to determine risk-adjusted utilization of services. This study utilized inpatient and ambulatory databases across 4 states: New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Florida, and Maryland. All patients undergoing lung cancer resection were included. The primary outcome was risk-adjusted utilization of services.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean risk-adjusted utilization of ambulatory procedures across all hospital referral regions (HRRs) was 34.1% (95% CI 30.7%-37.6%), while the individual HRR utilization varied from 10.9% to 54.9% (<em>P</em> &lt; .01). Mean risk-adjusted utilization of inpatient admissions in the 6 months prior to surgery was 15.3% (95% CI 13.9%-16.7%), ranging from 7.4% to 24.7% (<em>P</em> = .07) across HRRs. Finally, mean risk-adjusted utilization of inpatient hospitalizations in the 6 months following surgery was 19.4% (95% CI 17.7-21.0%), ranging from 10.0% to 33.6% (<em>P</em> = .19) across HRRs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Overall, we observed that utilization of ambulatory services varied significantly across HRRs, while inpatient utilization did not demonstrate significant variation. Given these findings, there may be geographic drivers of variation in the utilization of services surrounding lung cancer resection.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124001104/pdfft?md5=1591b6643128a670ccf177b50929efcd&pid=1-s2.0-S2772993124001104-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124001104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124001104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景随着以价值为基础的护理模式不断受到重视,以及需要改善肺癌护理整个过程的概况,我们需要更好地了解围绕护理事件的服务利用率的地域差异。方法在这项对 2017 年至 2019 年接受肺癌切除术的患者进行的回顾性队列研究中,我们考察了围绕肺癌切除术事件的服务利用率的地域差异。我们利用分层逻辑回归模型来确定风险调整后的服务利用率。本研究使用了 4 个州的住院和门诊数据库:新泽西州、宾夕法尼亚州、佛罗里达州和马里兰州。所有接受肺癌切除术的患者均被纳入研究范围。结果 所有医院转诊地区(HRRs)门诊手术的平均风险调整利用率为 34.1%(95% CI 30.7%-37.6%),而单个 HRR 利用率从 10.9% 到 54.9% 不等(P <.01)。手术前 6 个月住院病人的平均风险调整使用率为 15.3% (95% CI 13.9%-16.7%) ,各 HRR 的使用率从 7.4% 到 24.7% 不等(P = .07)。最后,经风险调整后,手术后 6 个月内住院病人的平均使用率为 19.4% (95% CI 17.7-21.0%),各 HRRs 的使用率从 10.0% 到 33.6% 不等(P = .19)。鉴于这些发现,肺癌切除术相关服务的利用率可能存在地域差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Geographic Variation in the Utilization of Services Surrounding Lung Cancer Resection

Background

As value-based care models continue to gain emphasis, along with the need for improved profiling across the continuum of lung cancer care, a better understanding of geographic variation in utilization of services surrounding episodes of care is needed.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing lung cancer resection from 2017 to 2019, we examined geographic variation in utilization of services surrounding episodes of lung cancer resection. We utilized hierarchical logistic regression models to determine risk-adjusted utilization of services. This study utilized inpatient and ambulatory databases across 4 states: New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Florida, and Maryland. All patients undergoing lung cancer resection were included. The primary outcome was risk-adjusted utilization of services.

Results

Mean risk-adjusted utilization of ambulatory procedures across all hospital referral regions (HRRs) was 34.1% (95% CI 30.7%-37.6%), while the individual HRR utilization varied from 10.9% to 54.9% (P < .01). Mean risk-adjusted utilization of inpatient admissions in the 6 months prior to surgery was 15.3% (95% CI 13.9%-16.7%), ranging from 7.4% to 24.7% (P = .07) across HRRs. Finally, mean risk-adjusted utilization of inpatient hospitalizations in the 6 months following surgery was 19.4% (95% CI 17.7-21.0%), ranging from 10.0% to 33.6% (P = .19) across HRRs.

Conclusions

Overall, we observed that utilization of ambulatory services varied significantly across HRRs, while inpatient utilization did not demonstrate significant variation. Given these findings, there may be geographic drivers of variation in the utilization of services surrounding lung cancer resection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信