TikTok 上与半月板相关的视频被广泛观看和分享,但对患者的教育质量却很差

Q3 Medicine
Riccardo D’Ambrosi M.D. , Timothy E. Hewett M.D.
{"title":"TikTok 上与半月板相关的视频被广泛观看和分享,但对患者的教育质量却很差","authors":"Riccardo D’Ambrosi M.D. ,&nbsp;Timothy E. Hewett M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the quality of meniscus-related TikTok videos to better understand their value for patient education.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The term “meniscus” was used as the key word for an extensive online search of video content on the TikTok on November 14, 2023. The first 100 videos were used for analysis. The duration of the videos and the number of likes, shares, and views were recorded for each video. Furthermore, videos were categorized based on the source (health workers, private user), the type of subject (patient experience, physical therapy, anatomy, clinical examination, surgical technique and injury mechanism), type of content (patient experience/testimony, education, rehabilitation), and the presence of music or voice. The quality and reliability assessments of video contents were conducted using the DISCERN instrument, the <em>Journal of the American Medical Association</em> benchmark criteria, and Global Quality Score.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 100 videos included in this study, 62 (62%) videos were published by health workers and 38 by private users (38%). Most of the information regarded patient experience (36, 36%), followed by physical therapy (32, 32%), anatomy (14, 14%), clinical examination (8, 8%), surgical technique (6, 6%), and injury mechanism (4, 4%). Video content reported patient experience in 39 (39%) videos, rehabilitation in 31 (31%) videos, and education in the remaining 30 (30%). The mean length of the videos was 39.12 ± 49.56 seconds. The mean number of views was 1,383,001.65 ± 5,291,822.28, whereas the mean numbers of comments, likes and shares were 408.53 ± 1976.90, 54,763.43 ± 211,823.44 and 873.70 ± 2,802.01, respectively. The mean DISCERN score, <em>Journal of the American Medical Association</em> benchmark criteria score, and Global Quality Score were 17.93 ± 5.07, 0.24 ± 0.47, and 1.15 ± 0.41, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Meniscus-related videos on TikTok are widely viewed and shared but the overall educational value to patients is poor.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><p>As patients increasingly use social media to learn about their conditions, it is important for orthopaedic health care professionals to understand the limitations of TikTok videos addressing the meniscus as potential sources of information for their patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"6 3","pages":"Article 100927"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24000452/pdfft?md5=16cd1ee774eed10bba785b5eab80f7a5&pid=1-s2.0-S2666061X24000452-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meniscus-Related Videos on TikTok Are Widely Viewed and Shared but the Educational Quality for Patients Is Poor\",\"authors\":\"Riccardo D’Ambrosi M.D. ,&nbsp;Timothy E. Hewett M.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the quality of meniscus-related TikTok videos to better understand their value for patient education.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The term “meniscus” was used as the key word for an extensive online search of video content on the TikTok on November 14, 2023. The first 100 videos were used for analysis. The duration of the videos and the number of likes, shares, and views were recorded for each video. Furthermore, videos were categorized based on the source (health workers, private user), the type of subject (patient experience, physical therapy, anatomy, clinical examination, surgical technique and injury mechanism), type of content (patient experience/testimony, education, rehabilitation), and the presence of music or voice. The quality and reliability assessments of video contents were conducted using the DISCERN instrument, the <em>Journal of the American Medical Association</em> benchmark criteria, and Global Quality Score.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 100 videos included in this study, 62 (62%) videos were published by health workers and 38 by private users (38%). Most of the information regarded patient experience (36, 36%), followed by physical therapy (32, 32%), anatomy (14, 14%), clinical examination (8, 8%), surgical technique (6, 6%), and injury mechanism (4, 4%). Video content reported patient experience in 39 (39%) videos, rehabilitation in 31 (31%) videos, and education in the remaining 30 (30%). The mean length of the videos was 39.12 ± 49.56 seconds. The mean number of views was 1,383,001.65 ± 5,291,822.28, whereas the mean numbers of comments, likes and shares were 408.53 ± 1976.90, 54,763.43 ± 211,823.44 and 873.70 ± 2,802.01, respectively. The mean DISCERN score, <em>Journal of the American Medical Association</em> benchmark criteria score, and Global Quality Score were 17.93 ± 5.07, 0.24 ± 0.47, and 1.15 ± 0.41, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Meniscus-related videos on TikTok are widely viewed and shared but the overall educational value to patients is poor.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><p>As patients increasingly use social media to learn about their conditions, it is important for orthopaedic health care professionals to understand the limitations of TikTok videos addressing the meniscus as potential sources of information for their patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100927\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24000452/pdfft?md5=16cd1ee774eed10bba785b5eab80f7a5&pid=1-s2.0-S2666061X24000452-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24000452\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24000452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估与半月板相关的 TikTok 视频的质量,以更好地了解其对患者教育的价值。方法使用 "半月板 "作为关键词,对 2023 年 11 月 14 日 TikTok 上的视频内容进行广泛的在线搜索。前 100 个视频被用于分析。记录了每个视频的持续时间、点赞数、分享数和观看数。此外,视频还根据来源(医务工作者、私人用户)、主题类型(患者经历、物理治疗、解剖学、临床检查、手术技术和损伤机制)、内容类型(患者经历/证词、教育、康复)以及是否有音乐或语音进行了分类。研究使用 DISCERN 工具、《美国医学会杂志》基准标准和全球质量评分对视频内容的质量和可靠性进行了评估。大部分信息涉及患者体验(36,36%),其次是物理治疗(32,32%)、解剖学(14,14%)、临床检查(8,8%)、手术技术(6,6%)和损伤机制(4,4%)。视频内容方面,39 个视频(39%)报道了患者体验,31 个视频(31%)报道了康复,其余 30 个视频(30%)报道了教育。视频的平均长度为 39.12 ± 49.56 秒。平均观看次数为 1,383,001.65 ± 5,291,822.28 次,平均评论、点赞和分享次数分别为 408.53 ± 1976.90 次、54,763.43 ± 211,823.44 次和 873.70 ± 2,802.01 次。结论TikTok上与半月板相关的视频被广泛观看和分享,但对患者的整体教育价值较低。临床意义随着患者越来越多地使用社交媒体来了解自己的病情,骨科医护人员必须了解TikTok上与半月板相关的视频作为患者潜在信息来源的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Meniscus-Related Videos on TikTok Are Widely Viewed and Shared but the Educational Quality for Patients Is Poor

Purpose

To evaluate the quality of meniscus-related TikTok videos to better understand their value for patient education.

Methods

The term “meniscus” was used as the key word for an extensive online search of video content on the TikTok on November 14, 2023. The first 100 videos were used for analysis. The duration of the videos and the number of likes, shares, and views were recorded for each video. Furthermore, videos were categorized based on the source (health workers, private user), the type of subject (patient experience, physical therapy, anatomy, clinical examination, surgical technique and injury mechanism), type of content (patient experience/testimony, education, rehabilitation), and the presence of music or voice. The quality and reliability assessments of video contents were conducted using the DISCERN instrument, the Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria, and Global Quality Score.

Results

Of the 100 videos included in this study, 62 (62%) videos were published by health workers and 38 by private users (38%). Most of the information regarded patient experience (36, 36%), followed by physical therapy (32, 32%), anatomy (14, 14%), clinical examination (8, 8%), surgical technique (6, 6%), and injury mechanism (4, 4%). Video content reported patient experience in 39 (39%) videos, rehabilitation in 31 (31%) videos, and education in the remaining 30 (30%). The mean length of the videos was 39.12 ± 49.56 seconds. The mean number of views was 1,383,001.65 ± 5,291,822.28, whereas the mean numbers of comments, likes and shares were 408.53 ± 1976.90, 54,763.43 ± 211,823.44 and 873.70 ± 2,802.01, respectively. The mean DISCERN score, Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria score, and Global Quality Score were 17.93 ± 5.07, 0.24 ± 0.47, and 1.15 ± 0.41, respectively.

Conclusions

Meniscus-related videos on TikTok are widely viewed and shared but the overall educational value to patients is poor.

Clinical Relevance

As patients increasingly use social media to learn about their conditions, it is important for orthopaedic health care professionals to understand the limitations of TikTok videos addressing the meniscus as potential sources of information for their patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信