制造业与欺诈:来自价格竞争和精益库存的证据

Adam W Du Pon, Stephanie Hairston, Dallin O. Smith
{"title":"制造业与欺诈:来自价格竞争和精益库存的证据","authors":"Adam W Du Pon, Stephanie Hairston, Dallin O. Smith","doi":"10.2308/jfar-2023-038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We examine fraud from an industry competition perspective, oriented from inventory theory. We find that fraud occurs among manufacturers more than nonmanufacturers and that the association between price competition and fraud is significantly more pronounced in the manufacturing sector. Aggregating inventory and cash flow patterns to the industry level, we report that industry inventory imbalance rates, from either excessive stockpiling or inventory leanness, associate with increased future price competition, which subsequently associates with more fraud. However, for manufacturers, the industry-wide prevalence of either excess or leanness amplifies future price competition, which is observed as a U-shaped association that ultimately ties to more fraud. These effects are stronger when extreme leanness is the manufacturing industry’s standard. We also provide evidence that the association between price competition and fraud is comparable to managerial incentives’ association with fraud. Together, our findings contribute to the literature on price competition, inventory management, and corporate misconduct.\n Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text.\n JEL Classifications: M11; M21; M41; L60.","PeriodicalId":149240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Accounting Research","volume":"37 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Manufacturing and Fraud: Evidence from Price Competition and Lean Inventories\",\"authors\":\"Adam W Du Pon, Stephanie Hairston, Dallin O. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/jfar-2023-038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n We examine fraud from an industry competition perspective, oriented from inventory theory. We find that fraud occurs among manufacturers more than nonmanufacturers and that the association between price competition and fraud is significantly more pronounced in the manufacturing sector. Aggregating inventory and cash flow patterns to the industry level, we report that industry inventory imbalance rates, from either excessive stockpiling or inventory leanness, associate with increased future price competition, which subsequently associates with more fraud. However, for manufacturers, the industry-wide prevalence of either excess or leanness amplifies future price competition, which is observed as a U-shaped association that ultimately ties to more fraud. These effects are stronger when extreme leanness is the manufacturing industry’s standard. We also provide evidence that the association between price competition and fraud is comparable to managerial incentives’ association with fraud. Together, our findings contribute to the literature on price competition, inventory management, and corporate misconduct.\\n Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text.\\n JEL Classifications: M11; M21; M41; L60.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Forensic Accounting Research\",\"volume\":\"37 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Forensic Accounting Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/jfar-2023-038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/jfar-2023-038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们以库存理论为导向,从行业竞争的角度研究了欺诈问题。我们发现,欺诈行为在制造商中的发生率高于非制造商,而且价格竞争与欺诈行为之间的关联在制造业中更为明显。将库存和现金流模式汇总到行业层面后,我们发现,由于过度囤积或库存不足造成的行业库存失衡率与未来价格竞争加剧有关,而价格竞争加剧又与更多的欺诈行为有关。然而,对于制造商而言,全行业普遍存在的库存过剩或库存不足都会加剧未来的价格竞争,这表现为一种 U 型关联,最终与更多的欺诈行为相关联。当制造业的标准是极度精益时,这些效应会更强。我们还提供证据表明,价格竞争与欺诈之间的关联与管理激励与欺诈之间的关联相当。总之,我们的研究结果为有关价格竞争、库存管理和企业不当行为的文献做出了贡献。数据可用性:数据可从文中引用的公共来源获得。JEL 分类:M11;M21;M41;L60。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Manufacturing and Fraud: Evidence from Price Competition and Lean Inventories
We examine fraud from an industry competition perspective, oriented from inventory theory. We find that fraud occurs among manufacturers more than nonmanufacturers and that the association between price competition and fraud is significantly more pronounced in the manufacturing sector. Aggregating inventory and cash flow patterns to the industry level, we report that industry inventory imbalance rates, from either excessive stockpiling or inventory leanness, associate with increased future price competition, which subsequently associates with more fraud. However, for manufacturers, the industry-wide prevalence of either excess or leanness amplifies future price competition, which is observed as a U-shaped association that ultimately ties to more fraud. These effects are stronger when extreme leanness is the manufacturing industry’s standard. We also provide evidence that the association between price competition and fraud is comparable to managerial incentives’ association with fraud. Together, our findings contribute to the literature on price competition, inventory management, and corporate misconduct. Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text. JEL Classifications: M11; M21; M41; L60.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信