传播定性研究中的哲学假设:范围审查

Dr. Hussein Khalifa, Hassan Khalifa
{"title":"传播定性研究中的哲学假设:范围审查","authors":"Dr. Hussein Khalifa, Hassan Khalifa","doi":"10.21608/ejsrt.2024.271307.1085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Philosophical assumptions are typically the first ideas in developing a study. This paper presents an overview of philosophical assumptions and interpretive frameworks in communication qualitative research. Upon adhering to a five-step scoping review, this study combed through articles that looked into philosophical assumptions and interpretive frameworks in communication qualitative research retrieved from six databases. Articles published in the past two decades were selected for this scoping review. As a result of reviewing 35 selected research papers, there are five stages to conceptualize the research process and situate philosophy and interpretive frameworks within the research process. In addition, the results show four philosophical assumptions including Ontological, Epistemological, Axiological, and Methodological assumptions. Furthermore, the findings revealed nine types of interpretive frameworks that can be used in qualitative research. In conclusion, although the philosophical assumptions are not always stated, the interpretive frameworks do convey different philosophical assumptions, and qualitative researchers need to be aware of this connection.","PeriodicalId":344808,"journal":{"name":"المجلة العلمية لبحوث الإذاعة والتلفزيون","volume":"18 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Philosophical Assumptions in Communication Qualitative Research: A Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Dr. Hussein Khalifa, Hassan Khalifa\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ejsrt.2024.271307.1085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Philosophical assumptions are typically the first ideas in developing a study. This paper presents an overview of philosophical assumptions and interpretive frameworks in communication qualitative research. Upon adhering to a five-step scoping review, this study combed through articles that looked into philosophical assumptions and interpretive frameworks in communication qualitative research retrieved from six databases. Articles published in the past two decades were selected for this scoping review. As a result of reviewing 35 selected research papers, there are five stages to conceptualize the research process and situate philosophy and interpretive frameworks within the research process. In addition, the results show four philosophical assumptions including Ontological, Epistemological, Axiological, and Methodological assumptions. Furthermore, the findings revealed nine types of interpretive frameworks that can be used in qualitative research. In conclusion, although the philosophical assumptions are not always stated, the interpretive frameworks do convey different philosophical assumptions, and qualitative researchers need to be aware of this connection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"المجلة العلمية لبحوث الإذاعة والتلفزيون\",\"volume\":\"18 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"المجلة العلمية لبحوث الإذاعة والتلفزيون\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejsrt.2024.271307.1085\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"المجلة العلمية لبحوث الإذاعة والتلفزيون","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejsrt.2024.271307.1085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

:哲学假设通常是开展研究的首要理念。本文概述了传播学定性研究中的哲学假设和解释框架。根据五步范围审查法,本研究梳理了从六个数据库中检索到的有关传播定性研究中的哲学假设和解释框架的文章。本研究选择了过去二十年发表的文章进行范围界定。经过对 35 篇选定研究论文的审查,研究过程概念化分为五个阶段,并将哲学和解释框架置于研究过程中。此外,研究结果显示了四种哲学假设,包括本体论假设、认识论假设、公理假设和方法论假设。此外,研究结果还揭示了九种可用于定性研究的解释框架。总之,虽然哲学假设并不总是明示的,但解释框架确实传达了不同的哲学假设,定性研究人员需要意识到这种联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Philosophical Assumptions in Communication Qualitative Research: A Scoping Review
: Philosophical assumptions are typically the first ideas in developing a study. This paper presents an overview of philosophical assumptions and interpretive frameworks in communication qualitative research. Upon adhering to a five-step scoping review, this study combed through articles that looked into philosophical assumptions and interpretive frameworks in communication qualitative research retrieved from six databases. Articles published in the past two decades were selected for this scoping review. As a result of reviewing 35 selected research papers, there are five stages to conceptualize the research process and situate philosophy and interpretive frameworks within the research process. In addition, the results show four philosophical assumptions including Ontological, Epistemological, Axiological, and Methodological assumptions. Furthermore, the findings revealed nine types of interpretive frameworks that can be used in qualitative research. In conclusion, although the philosophical assumptions are not always stated, the interpretive frameworks do convey different philosophical assumptions, and qualitative researchers need to be aware of this connection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信