口内显微镜辅助霰粒肿切开术治疗中大型颌下腺霰粒肿:改良技术

Emad A. Magdy, Mahmoud Seif-Elnasr, Omneya Gamaleldin, Mohamed K. Taha, Mohamed F. Fathalla
{"title":"口内显微镜辅助霰粒肿切开术治疗中大型颌下腺霰粒肿:改良技术","authors":"Emad A. Magdy, Mahmoud Seif-Elnasr, Omneya Gamaleldin, Mohamed K. Taha, Mohamed F. Fathalla","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sialendoscopy has become the standard treatment for sialolithiasis; however, larger submandibular calculi may require an incisional technique. This study describes and evaluates an intraoral microscopic‐assisted sialolithotomy (IMAS) as a refined submandibular stone extraction technique.Retrospective case series of 64 submandibular IMAS procedures operated at a tertiary university center and private hospital from 2015 to 2021 were evaluated. Preoperative radiological assessment included noncontrast computed tomography scan ± magnetic resonance sialography. Stone characteristics (side, number, size, and location), operative findings, complications, and postoperative follow‐up were reviewed. Success was defined as successful intraoral stone extraction with no symptoms or stone recurrence for at least 12 months postoperatively.The study included 43 males and 19 females, mean age 38 ± 12 years. Two patients had bilateral stones. All but one operated gland had stones extracted (98.4%), however the true success was 93.8% (60/64) as three patients had recurrent/residual stones within a year. Biggest stone longest diameter was 9.8 ± 4.6 mm (range, 5–30 mm). Hilar and intraglandular stone locations were 73.4% and 6.3%, respectively. Median operative time was 55 min. Adjunctive sialendoscopy was performed in 42.2%. Its use is significantly correlated with having ˃3 stones (mean 3.4 vs. 1.2 stones) [P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval: −3.19 to −1.25]. Minor complications included temporary lingual paresthesia (7.8%) and postoperative ranula (1.6%).Submandibular IMAS is a highly effective safe technique for stones (≥5 mm). The improved microscopic visualization, illumination and magnification allows addressing all stone locations including intraglandular calculi and enables better lingual nerve identification and preservation.","PeriodicalId":510563,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoral microscopic‐assisted sialolithotomy for management of medium‐large submandibular sialolithiasis: A refined technique\",\"authors\":\"Emad A. Magdy, Mahmoud Seif-Elnasr, Omneya Gamaleldin, Mohamed K. Taha, Mohamed F. Fathalla\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wjo2.153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sialendoscopy has become the standard treatment for sialolithiasis; however, larger submandibular calculi may require an incisional technique. This study describes and evaluates an intraoral microscopic‐assisted sialolithotomy (IMAS) as a refined submandibular stone extraction technique.Retrospective case series of 64 submandibular IMAS procedures operated at a tertiary university center and private hospital from 2015 to 2021 were evaluated. Preoperative radiological assessment included noncontrast computed tomography scan ± magnetic resonance sialography. Stone characteristics (side, number, size, and location), operative findings, complications, and postoperative follow‐up were reviewed. Success was defined as successful intraoral stone extraction with no symptoms or stone recurrence for at least 12 months postoperatively.The study included 43 males and 19 females, mean age 38 ± 12 years. Two patients had bilateral stones. All but one operated gland had stones extracted (98.4%), however the true success was 93.8% (60/64) as three patients had recurrent/residual stones within a year. Biggest stone longest diameter was 9.8 ± 4.6 mm (range, 5–30 mm). Hilar and intraglandular stone locations were 73.4% and 6.3%, respectively. Median operative time was 55 min. Adjunctive sialendoscopy was performed in 42.2%. Its use is significantly correlated with having ˃3 stones (mean 3.4 vs. 1.2 stones) [P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval: −3.19 to −1.25]. Minor complications included temporary lingual paresthesia (7.8%) and postoperative ranula (1.6%).Submandibular IMAS is a highly effective safe technique for stones (≥5 mm). The improved microscopic visualization, illumination and magnification allows addressing all stone locations including intraglandular calculi and enables better lingual nerve identification and preservation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

霰粒肿内窥镜检查已成为治疗霰粒肿的标准方法;然而,较大的颌下结石可能需要采用切开技术。本研究描述并评估了口腔内显微镜辅助霰粒肿切开术(IMAS),将其作为一种改良的颌下结石取出技术。本研究评估了 2015 年至 2021 年在一所三级大学中心和私立医院进行的 64 例颌下 IMAS 手术的回顾性病例系列。术前放射学评估包括非对比计算机断层扫描和磁共振颌面造影。对结石特征(侧面、数量、大小和位置)、手术结果、并发症和术后随访进行了回顾。成功的定义是口内取石成功,术后至少12个月内无症状或结石复发。两名患者为双侧结石。除一名患者外,所有接受手术的腺体都取出了结石(98.4%),但真正的成功率为 93.8%(60/64),因为有三名患者在一年内复发/残留结石。最大结石的最长直径为 9.8 ± 4.6 毫米(范围为 5-30 毫米)。结石位于肝门和腺内的比例分别为73.4%和6.3%。手术时间中位数为55分钟。42.2%的患者进行了辅助巩膜内镜检查。内镜的使用与结石数量达到˃3(平均 3.4 颗对 1.2 颗)明显相关[P < 0.001,95% 置信区间:-3.19 到 -1.25] 。轻微并发症包括暂时性舌麻痹(7.8%)和术后匐茎(1.6%)。显微镜视野、照明和放大率的提高可解决包括腺内结石在内的所有结石位置,并能更好地识别和保护舌神经。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intraoral microscopic‐assisted sialolithotomy for management of medium‐large submandibular sialolithiasis: A refined technique
Sialendoscopy has become the standard treatment for sialolithiasis; however, larger submandibular calculi may require an incisional technique. This study describes and evaluates an intraoral microscopic‐assisted sialolithotomy (IMAS) as a refined submandibular stone extraction technique.Retrospective case series of 64 submandibular IMAS procedures operated at a tertiary university center and private hospital from 2015 to 2021 were evaluated. Preoperative radiological assessment included noncontrast computed tomography scan ± magnetic resonance sialography. Stone characteristics (side, number, size, and location), operative findings, complications, and postoperative follow‐up were reviewed. Success was defined as successful intraoral stone extraction with no symptoms or stone recurrence for at least 12 months postoperatively.The study included 43 males and 19 females, mean age 38 ± 12 years. Two patients had bilateral stones. All but one operated gland had stones extracted (98.4%), however the true success was 93.8% (60/64) as three patients had recurrent/residual stones within a year. Biggest stone longest diameter was 9.8 ± 4.6 mm (range, 5–30 mm). Hilar and intraglandular stone locations were 73.4% and 6.3%, respectively. Median operative time was 55 min. Adjunctive sialendoscopy was performed in 42.2%. Its use is significantly correlated with having ˃3 stones (mean 3.4 vs. 1.2 stones) [P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval: −3.19 to −1.25]. Minor complications included temporary lingual paresthesia (7.8%) and postoperative ranula (1.6%).Submandibular IMAS is a highly effective safe technique for stones (≥5 mm). The improved microscopic visualization, illumination and magnification allows addressing all stone locations including intraglandular calculi and enables better lingual nerve identification and preservation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信