对斯洛文尼亚国家博物馆收藏的武器和盔甲的早期研究

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Kronika Pub Date : 2024-03-05 DOI:10.56420/kronika.72.1.11
Tomaž Lazar
{"title":"对斯洛文尼亚国家博物馆收藏的武器和盔甲的早期研究","authors":"Tomaž Lazar","doi":"10.56420/kronika.72.1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of historical arms and armour has no firmly established tradition in Slovenian scholarship. This may be attributed to various factors – on the one hand, the widely entrenched notions of Slovenia’s past reduced to a mythologised nation of peace-loving country folk, and on the other hand, the lack of representative arms and armour collections belonging to noble elites, such as may be found in the neighbouring political centres. A rather unreflective approach to military historical heritage could be observed during the formative period of the Carniolan Provincial Museum in Ljubljana, the precursor to the later National Museum, where this particular field remained largely uncharted until the end of World War II. Ljubljana’s museum experts ultimately recognised the true value of their arms and armour collection only towards the end of the 1950s, to a considerable extent or even mainly thanks to the interest of outside observers and foreign connoisseurs like the Viennese curator Dr Bruno Thomas. Within the National Museum, this shift finally stimulated the creation of a curatorial post devoted to arms and armour. Its tasks were entrusted to Ferdinand Tancik, Slovenia’s first specialist in the military heritage of the premodern era and, despite his brief career, a surprisingly influential local pioneer in arms and armour studies.","PeriodicalId":38751,"journal":{"name":"Kronika","volume":"34 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early studies of the arms and armour collection in the National Museum of Slovenia\",\"authors\":\"Tomaž Lazar\",\"doi\":\"10.56420/kronika.72.1.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study of historical arms and armour has no firmly established tradition in Slovenian scholarship. This may be attributed to various factors – on the one hand, the widely entrenched notions of Slovenia’s past reduced to a mythologised nation of peace-loving country folk, and on the other hand, the lack of representative arms and armour collections belonging to noble elites, such as may be found in the neighbouring political centres. A rather unreflective approach to military historical heritage could be observed during the formative period of the Carniolan Provincial Museum in Ljubljana, the precursor to the later National Museum, where this particular field remained largely uncharted until the end of World War II. Ljubljana’s museum experts ultimately recognised the true value of their arms and armour collection only towards the end of the 1950s, to a considerable extent or even mainly thanks to the interest of outside observers and foreign connoisseurs like the Viennese curator Dr Bruno Thomas. Within the National Museum, this shift finally stimulated the creation of a curatorial post devoted to arms and armour. Its tasks were entrusted to Ferdinand Tancik, Slovenia’s first specialist in the military heritage of the premodern era and, despite his brief career, a surprisingly influential local pioneer in arms and armour studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kronika\",\"volume\":\"34 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kronika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56420/kronika.72.1.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kronika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56420/kronika.72.1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在斯洛文尼亚学术界,对历史上的武器和盔甲的研究并没有牢固的传统。这可归因于多种因素--一方面,人们普遍认为斯洛文尼亚的过去是由爱好和平的乡下人组成的神话化国家;另一方面,斯洛文尼亚缺乏像邻近政治中心那样具有代表性的贵族精英武器和盔甲收藏。在卢布尔雅那的卡尼奥拉省博物馆(即后来的国家博物馆的前身)的形成时期,可以看到对军事历史遗产的一种相当缺乏反思的态度。卢布尔雅那博物馆的专家们直到 20 世纪 50 年代末才最终认识到其武器和盔甲收藏的真正价值,这在很大程度上甚至主要归功于外部观察家和外国鉴赏家(如维也纳策展人布鲁诺-托马斯博士)的兴趣。这一转变最终促使国家博物馆设立了一个专门负责武器和盔甲的馆长职位。费迪南德-坦契克(Ferdinand Tancik)被委以重任,他是斯洛文尼亚第一位研究前现代时期军事遗产的专家,尽管职业生涯短暂,但却是当地武器和盔甲研究领域具有惊人影响力的先驱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early studies of the arms and armour collection in the National Museum of Slovenia
The study of historical arms and armour has no firmly established tradition in Slovenian scholarship. This may be attributed to various factors – on the one hand, the widely entrenched notions of Slovenia’s past reduced to a mythologised nation of peace-loving country folk, and on the other hand, the lack of representative arms and armour collections belonging to noble elites, such as may be found in the neighbouring political centres. A rather unreflective approach to military historical heritage could be observed during the formative period of the Carniolan Provincial Museum in Ljubljana, the precursor to the later National Museum, where this particular field remained largely uncharted until the end of World War II. Ljubljana’s museum experts ultimately recognised the true value of their arms and armour collection only towards the end of the 1950s, to a considerable extent or even mainly thanks to the interest of outside observers and foreign connoisseurs like the Viennese curator Dr Bruno Thomas. Within the National Museum, this shift finally stimulated the creation of a curatorial post devoted to arms and armour. Its tasks were entrusted to Ferdinand Tancik, Slovenia’s first specialist in the military heritage of the premodern era and, despite his brief career, a surprisingly influential local pioneer in arms and armour studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kronika
Kronika Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信