马耳他对双性人的文化认识:隐形、耻辱和认识上的不公正

Claudia Bartolo Tabone, Fae Garland, Mitchell Travis
{"title":"马耳他对双性人的文化认识:隐形、耻辱和认识上的不公正","authors":"Claudia Bartolo Tabone, Fae Garland, Mitchell Travis","doi":"10.3390/socsci13030150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2015, Malta introduced ground-breaking legal reform designed to protect the bodily integrity of intersex infants in Malta. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals, lawyers, policy-makers and advocates, this article considers the extent to which this reform has improved the cultural visibility and recognition of intersex people in Malta. Engaging with literature on epistemic injustice, this article provides new evidence for a cultural silence around intersex bodies that operates not only at a level of public knowledge but also at the individual and institutional levels. Our findings relate to three categories of visibility: political, cultural and medical. While the political visibility of intersex was an important factor in the introduction and shape of law reform in Malta, our respondents felt that the legislation had had very little effect on public understandings and familiarity with intersex issues. Moreover, respondents felt that many intersex people would be unlikely to know that they were intersex due to the limited conceptual and critical resources available to them: issues such as stigma and shame further encourage the epistemic silencing of intersex issues. The lack of cultural and medical visibility has significantly limited both the intended and hoped-for effect of the legislation. The article considers the broader implications of these results beyond Malta for those seeking to use the law to improve the lived experiences of intersex people.","PeriodicalId":94209,"journal":{"name":"Social sciences","volume":"36 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultural Awareness of Intersex in Malta: Invisibility, Stigma and Epistemic Injustice\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Bartolo Tabone, Fae Garland, Mitchell Travis\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/socsci13030150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2015, Malta introduced ground-breaking legal reform designed to protect the bodily integrity of intersex infants in Malta. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals, lawyers, policy-makers and advocates, this article considers the extent to which this reform has improved the cultural visibility and recognition of intersex people in Malta. Engaging with literature on epistemic injustice, this article provides new evidence for a cultural silence around intersex bodies that operates not only at a level of public knowledge but also at the individual and institutional levels. Our findings relate to three categories of visibility: political, cultural and medical. While the political visibility of intersex was an important factor in the introduction and shape of law reform in Malta, our respondents felt that the legislation had had very little effect on public understandings and familiarity with intersex issues. Moreover, respondents felt that many intersex people would be unlikely to know that they were intersex due to the limited conceptual and critical resources available to them: issues such as stigma and shame further encourage the epistemic silencing of intersex issues. The lack of cultural and medical visibility has significantly limited both the intended and hoped-for effect of the legislation. The article considers the broader implications of these results beyond Malta for those seeking to use the law to improve the lived experiences of intersex people.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social sciences\",\"volume\":\"36 23\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13030150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social sciences","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13030150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2015年,马耳他进行了突破性的法律改革,旨在保护马耳他双性婴儿的身体完整性。本文通过对医疗保健专业人士、律师、政策制定者和倡导者的半结构式访谈,探讨了这项改革在多大程度上提高了马耳他双性人的文化能见度和认可度。结合认识论不公正方面的文献,本文提供了新的证据,证明围绕双性人身体的文化沉默不仅存在于公共知识层面,也存在于个人和机构层面。我们的研究结果涉及三类可见性:政治、文化和医疗。虽然双性人在政治上的能见度是马耳他推行和形成法律改革的一个重要因素,但我们的受访者认为,立法对公众理解和熟悉双性人问题的影响甚微。此外,受访者认为,许多双性人不太可能知道自己是双性人,因为他们所能获得的概念性和关键性资源有限:耻辱感和羞耻感等问题进一步助长了对双性人问题认识上的沉默。缺乏文化和医疗能见度极大地限制了立法的预期和期望效果。文章探讨了这些结果在马耳他以外地区对那些寻求利用法律改善双性人生活经历的人们的广泛影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cultural Awareness of Intersex in Malta: Invisibility, Stigma and Epistemic Injustice
In 2015, Malta introduced ground-breaking legal reform designed to protect the bodily integrity of intersex infants in Malta. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals, lawyers, policy-makers and advocates, this article considers the extent to which this reform has improved the cultural visibility and recognition of intersex people in Malta. Engaging with literature on epistemic injustice, this article provides new evidence for a cultural silence around intersex bodies that operates not only at a level of public knowledge but also at the individual and institutional levels. Our findings relate to three categories of visibility: political, cultural and medical. While the political visibility of intersex was an important factor in the introduction and shape of law reform in Malta, our respondents felt that the legislation had had very little effect on public understandings and familiarity with intersex issues. Moreover, respondents felt that many intersex people would be unlikely to know that they were intersex due to the limited conceptual and critical resources available to them: issues such as stigma and shame further encourage the epistemic silencing of intersex issues. The lack of cultural and medical visibility has significantly limited both the intended and hoped-for effect of the legislation. The article considers the broader implications of these results beyond Malta for those seeking to use the law to improve the lived experiences of intersex people.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信