从在线信任建立机制的角度阐释电子市场中再购意向的驱动因素

IF 1.2 Q4 BUSINESS
Brandon Wen, Florentina Kurniasari, Elissa Dwi Lestari
{"title":"从在线信任建立机制的角度阐释电子市场中再购意向的驱动因素","authors":"Brandon Wen, Florentina Kurniasari, Elissa Dwi Lestari","doi":"10.21511/im.20(1).2024.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indonesia has low e-commerce transactions despite high internet usage. This study examines the e-repurchase intention on Lazada Indonesia, an e-marketplace with declining traffic and sales. This study uses the perceived usefulness of institutional-based mechanisms, the perceived usefulness of seller-based mechanisms, and the perceived usefulness of experience-based mechanisms to examine how trust in the e-market and e-seller affect repurchase intention. This quantitative study includes 231 Lazada Indonesia customers from the past three months (the survey was conducted in January 2023). The data were statistically analyzed with partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). 43.72% of the respondents shop one to three times a month, 42.42% – more than three times per month, and 13.85 – less than once per month. Trust in the e-marketplace increased when participants believed institutional-based processes were beneficial (with a beta value of 0.272 and a P value of 0.000) and seller-based mechanisms were valuable (with a beta value of 0.509 and a P value of 0.000). In terms of trust in the e-seller, only the perceived usefulness of seller-based mechanisms has a significant effect (with a beta value of 0.567 and a P value of 0.000), while the perceived usefulness of experience-based mechanisms has no effect. This study has also shown that e-seller trust significantly affects repurchase intention. Finally, with a beta value of -0.055 and a P value of 0.046, e-marketplace trust negatively moderates the relationship between e-seller trust and repurchase intention. Thus, e-marketplace trust can replace e-seller trust in customer repurchase intentions.\nAcknowledgmentThis study is conducted with the support of Universitas Multimedia Nusantara.","PeriodicalId":37060,"journal":{"name":"Innovative Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elucidating drivers of repurchase intention in the e-marketplace through the lens of online trust-building mechanisms\",\"authors\":\"Brandon Wen, Florentina Kurniasari, Elissa Dwi Lestari\",\"doi\":\"10.21511/im.20(1).2024.18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Indonesia has low e-commerce transactions despite high internet usage. This study examines the e-repurchase intention on Lazada Indonesia, an e-marketplace with declining traffic and sales. This study uses the perceived usefulness of institutional-based mechanisms, the perceived usefulness of seller-based mechanisms, and the perceived usefulness of experience-based mechanisms to examine how trust in the e-market and e-seller affect repurchase intention. This quantitative study includes 231 Lazada Indonesia customers from the past three months (the survey was conducted in January 2023). The data were statistically analyzed with partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). 43.72% of the respondents shop one to three times a month, 42.42% – more than three times per month, and 13.85 – less than once per month. Trust in the e-marketplace increased when participants believed institutional-based processes were beneficial (with a beta value of 0.272 and a P value of 0.000) and seller-based mechanisms were valuable (with a beta value of 0.509 and a P value of 0.000). In terms of trust in the e-seller, only the perceived usefulness of seller-based mechanisms has a significant effect (with a beta value of 0.567 and a P value of 0.000), while the perceived usefulness of experience-based mechanisms has no effect. This study has also shown that e-seller trust significantly affects repurchase intention. Finally, with a beta value of -0.055 and a P value of 0.046, e-marketplace trust negatively moderates the relationship between e-seller trust and repurchase intention. Thus, e-marketplace trust can replace e-seller trust in customer repurchase intentions.\\nAcknowledgmentThis study is conducted with the support of Universitas Multimedia Nusantara.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovative Marketing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovative Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21511/im.20(1).2024.18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovative Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/im.20(1).2024.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管互联网使用率很高,但印尼的电子商务交易量却很低。本研究探讨了印尼 Lazada 电子市场的电子购买意向,这是一个流量和销售额都在下降的电子市场。本研究使用基于制度的机制的有用性感知、基于卖方的机制的有用性感知和基于经验的机制的有用性感知来研究对电子市场和电子卖方的信任如何影响再购买意愿。本定量研究包括过去三个月(调查于 2023 年 1 月进行)231 位 Lazada 印度尼西亚客户。数据采用偏最小二乘法结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)进行统计分析。43.72%的受访者每月购物一至三次,42.42%的受访者每月购物三次以上,13.85%的受访者每月购物不足一次。当受访者认为以机构为基础的程序是有益的(贝塔值为 0.272,P 值为 0.000)和以卖方为基础的机制是有价值的(贝塔值为 0.509,P 值为 0.000)时,他们对电子市场的信任度就会增加。在对电子卖家的信任方面,只有基于卖家的机制的有用性有显著影响(贝塔值为 0.567,P 值为 0.000),而基于经验的机制的有用性没有影响。本研究还表明,电子销售商信任对再购买意愿有重大影响。最后,电子市场信任的贝塔值为-0.055,P 值为 0.046,负向调节了电子销售商信任与再购买意愿之间的关系。因此,电子市场信任可以取代电子销售商信任,影响客户的再购买意愿。 鸣谢本研究得到了新加坡多媒体大学的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Elucidating drivers of repurchase intention in the e-marketplace through the lens of online trust-building mechanisms
Indonesia has low e-commerce transactions despite high internet usage. This study examines the e-repurchase intention on Lazada Indonesia, an e-marketplace with declining traffic and sales. This study uses the perceived usefulness of institutional-based mechanisms, the perceived usefulness of seller-based mechanisms, and the perceived usefulness of experience-based mechanisms to examine how trust in the e-market and e-seller affect repurchase intention. This quantitative study includes 231 Lazada Indonesia customers from the past three months (the survey was conducted in January 2023). The data were statistically analyzed with partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). 43.72% of the respondents shop one to three times a month, 42.42% – more than three times per month, and 13.85 – less than once per month. Trust in the e-marketplace increased when participants believed institutional-based processes were beneficial (with a beta value of 0.272 and a P value of 0.000) and seller-based mechanisms were valuable (with a beta value of 0.509 and a P value of 0.000). In terms of trust in the e-seller, only the perceived usefulness of seller-based mechanisms has a significant effect (with a beta value of 0.567 and a P value of 0.000), while the perceived usefulness of experience-based mechanisms has no effect. This study has also shown that e-seller trust significantly affects repurchase intention. Finally, with a beta value of -0.055 and a P value of 0.046, e-marketplace trust negatively moderates the relationship between e-seller trust and repurchase intention. Thus, e-marketplace trust can replace e-seller trust in customer repurchase intentions. AcknowledgmentThis study is conducted with the support of Universitas Multimedia Nusantara.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Innovative Marketing
Innovative Marketing Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
58
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信