医疗急救计划中的自主权和倡导权:有学习障碍的成年人和家庭照护者对 "建议的紧急护理和治疗简要计划"(ReSPECT)流程的体验和看法

Amy M. Russell, Jacqui M Lovell, J. Harlock, Frances Griffiths, A. Slowther
{"title":"医疗急救计划中的自主权和倡导权:有学习障碍的成年人和家庭照护者对 \"建议的紧急护理和治疗简要计划\"(ReSPECT)流程的体验和看法","authors":"Amy M. Russell, Jacqui M Lovell, J. Harlock, Frances Griffiths, A. Slowther","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13555.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) is designed to facilitate meaningful discussions between healthcare professionals, patients, and their family about preferences for treatment in future medical emergencies. People with a learning disability may face particular barriers in completing health care plans and receiving emergency treatment, however little is known about their preferences towards emergency care treatment planning. This study explores the views of people with a learning disability, and family carers about ReSPECT. Methods Online, arts-based interactive workshops were held with people with a learning disability to explore how they felt about emergency care treatment planning, and to co-produce materials to support ReSPECT conversations. Carers of people with a learning disability participated in focus groups or interviews. Data from workshops, focus groups and interviews were analysed thematically. Results Themes identified were: Getting the Process Right, Lack of trust as a barrier to ReSPECT planning, and Person-Centred Care. All groups supported the ReSPECT process. They felt that ReSPECT plans could support person-centred care, enhancing the autonomy of a person with a learning disability and supporting the advocacy of carers. However, drawing on their previous experiences of the health care system some expressed doubt that their wishes, as reflected in the recommendations, would be carried out. Suggestions were made for improving the ReSPECT process for people with a learning disability and used to develop resources to support ReSPECT planning. Conclusions Emergency care planning and ReSPECT are viewed positively by people with a learning disability and family carers. To ensure this works well for people with a learning disability attention should be given to reasonable, personalised adjustments to support their participation in planning conversations. There is a wider challenge of fostering trust in the health care system regarding treatment of people with a learning disability.","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"50 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Autonomy & advocacy in planning for a medical emergency: Adults with a learning disability and family carers’ experiences and perceptions of the Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) process\",\"authors\":\"Amy M. Russell, Jacqui M Lovell, J. Harlock, Frances Griffiths, A. Slowther\",\"doi\":\"10.3310/nihropenres.13555.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background The Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) is designed to facilitate meaningful discussions between healthcare professionals, patients, and their family about preferences for treatment in future medical emergencies. People with a learning disability may face particular barriers in completing health care plans and receiving emergency treatment, however little is known about their preferences towards emergency care treatment planning. This study explores the views of people with a learning disability, and family carers about ReSPECT. Methods Online, arts-based interactive workshops were held with people with a learning disability to explore how they felt about emergency care treatment planning, and to co-produce materials to support ReSPECT conversations. Carers of people with a learning disability participated in focus groups or interviews. Data from workshops, focus groups and interviews were analysed thematically. Results Themes identified were: Getting the Process Right, Lack of trust as a barrier to ReSPECT planning, and Person-Centred Care. All groups supported the ReSPECT process. They felt that ReSPECT plans could support person-centred care, enhancing the autonomy of a person with a learning disability and supporting the advocacy of carers. However, drawing on their previous experiences of the health care system some expressed doubt that their wishes, as reflected in the recommendations, would be carried out. Suggestions were made for improving the ReSPECT process for people with a learning disability and used to develop resources to support ReSPECT planning. Conclusions Emergency care planning and ReSPECT are viewed positively by people with a learning disability and family carers. To ensure this works well for people with a learning disability attention should be given to reasonable, personalised adjustments to support their participation in planning conversations. There is a wider challenge of fostering trust in the health care system regarding treatment of people with a learning disability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NIHR open research\",\"volume\":\"50 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NIHR open research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13555.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13555.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 《建议的紧急护理和治疗总结计划》(ReSPECT)旨在促进医护人员、患者及其家人就未来医疗紧急情况下的治疗偏好进行有意义的讨论。有学习障碍的人在完成健康护理计划和接受紧急治疗时可能会面临特殊的障碍,但人们对他们对紧急护理治疗计划的偏好却知之甚少。本研究探讨了学习障碍者和家庭照顾者对 ReSPECT 的看法。研究方法 与学习障碍者一起举办了基于艺术的在线互动研讨会,探讨他们对紧急护理治疗计划的看法,并共同制作材料以支持 ReSPECT 对话。学习障碍者的照顾者参加了焦点小组或访谈。我们对来自研讨会、焦点小组和访谈的数据进行了专题分析。结果 确定的主题有正确处理流程、缺乏信任是 ReSPECT 计划的障碍以及以人为本的护理。所有小组都支持 ReSPECT 程序。他们认为 ReSPECT 计划可以支持以人为本的护理,提高学习障碍者的自主性,并支持护理者的倡导。然而,根据他们以前在医疗保健系统中的经验,有些人对建议中反映的他们的愿望能否得到实现表示怀疑。我们为有学习障碍的人提出了改进 ReSPECT 流程的建议,并将其用于开发支持 ReSPECT 规划的资源。结论 有学习障碍的人和家庭照顾者对紧急护理计划和 ReSPECT 有积极的看法。为确保有学习障碍的人能够很好地使用,应注意进行合理的、个性化的调整,以支持他们参与规划对话。在治疗有学习障碍的人方面,如何培养人们对医疗保健系统的信任是一个更广泛的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Autonomy & advocacy in planning for a medical emergency: Adults with a learning disability and family carers’ experiences and perceptions of the Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) process
Background The Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) is designed to facilitate meaningful discussions between healthcare professionals, patients, and their family about preferences for treatment in future medical emergencies. People with a learning disability may face particular barriers in completing health care plans and receiving emergency treatment, however little is known about their preferences towards emergency care treatment planning. This study explores the views of people with a learning disability, and family carers about ReSPECT. Methods Online, arts-based interactive workshops were held with people with a learning disability to explore how they felt about emergency care treatment planning, and to co-produce materials to support ReSPECT conversations. Carers of people with a learning disability participated in focus groups or interviews. Data from workshops, focus groups and interviews were analysed thematically. Results Themes identified were: Getting the Process Right, Lack of trust as a barrier to ReSPECT planning, and Person-Centred Care. All groups supported the ReSPECT process. They felt that ReSPECT plans could support person-centred care, enhancing the autonomy of a person with a learning disability and supporting the advocacy of carers. However, drawing on their previous experiences of the health care system some expressed doubt that their wishes, as reflected in the recommendations, would be carried out. Suggestions were made for improving the ReSPECT process for people with a learning disability and used to develop resources to support ReSPECT planning. Conclusions Emergency care planning and ReSPECT are viewed positively by people with a learning disability and family carers. To ensure this works well for people with a learning disability attention should be given to reasonable, personalised adjustments to support their participation in planning conversations. There is a wider challenge of fostering trust in the health care system regarding treatment of people with a learning disability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信