政治品牌:2022 年大选中总统候选人使用竞选颜色作为政纲的象征意义

Christal Jane Alturas, Jessica Khendy Balanza, Precious Lyca Cabalse, Khrist Jaira Ignacio, Alexander Jr. Killip, Khristine Claire Nicdao
{"title":"政治品牌:2022 年大选中总统候选人使用竞选颜色作为政纲的象征意义","authors":"Christal Jane Alturas, Jessica Khendy Balanza, Precious Lyca Cabalse, Khrist Jaira Ignacio, Alexander Jr. Killip, Khristine Claire Nicdao","doi":"10.48017/dj.v9ispecial1.2831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a very complex nature of politics, color serves as a low-level heuristic for voters, especially the use of campaign color as a symbolism of platforms. This study sought to determine the level of agreement on the universal meaning of the different colors chosen by the Presidential candidates during the 2022 national elections; the level of agreement if the political colors of the presidential candidates and its representation to their political platforms; and if these chosen political colors correspond to the platforms of the presidential candidates among the students of the School of Teachers and Liberal Arts of the University of Baguio. A mixed method with a self-constructed questionnaire using the Likert Scale to determine the level of agreement among the 143 respondents and an interview with 8 informants among the students was used in this study. The study revealed that the color Red is the most misinterpreted color because of its historical and psychological connotations which led to its negative symbolism. While both Pink and Blue, showed a positive result because of their psychological, cultural, and political aspect. Furthermore, all colors aligned with their platforms except the color Red by Marcos with his platform about Unity. Additionally, the presidential candidates' platforms were based on their personal and political factors. Overall, the research suggests that there’s still no established meaning of political colors in our country and that voters still take issue with what the colors truly represent.","PeriodicalId":356865,"journal":{"name":"Diversitas Journal","volume":"29 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political Branding: The use of campaign color as symbolism of platforms among the presidential candidates in the 2022 elections\",\"authors\":\"Christal Jane Alturas, Jessica Khendy Balanza, Precious Lyca Cabalse, Khrist Jaira Ignacio, Alexander Jr. Killip, Khristine Claire Nicdao\",\"doi\":\"10.48017/dj.v9ispecial1.2831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a very complex nature of politics, color serves as a low-level heuristic for voters, especially the use of campaign color as a symbolism of platforms. This study sought to determine the level of agreement on the universal meaning of the different colors chosen by the Presidential candidates during the 2022 national elections; the level of agreement if the political colors of the presidential candidates and its representation to their political platforms; and if these chosen political colors correspond to the platforms of the presidential candidates among the students of the School of Teachers and Liberal Arts of the University of Baguio. A mixed method with a self-constructed questionnaire using the Likert Scale to determine the level of agreement among the 143 respondents and an interview with 8 informants among the students was used in this study. The study revealed that the color Red is the most misinterpreted color because of its historical and psychological connotations which led to its negative symbolism. While both Pink and Blue, showed a positive result because of their psychological, cultural, and political aspect. Furthermore, all colors aligned with their platforms except the color Red by Marcos with his platform about Unity. Additionally, the presidential candidates' platforms were based on their personal and political factors. Overall, the research suggests that there’s still no established meaning of political colors in our country and that voters still take issue with what the colors truly represent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diversitas Journal\",\"volume\":\"29 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diversitas Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v9ispecial1.2831\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversitas Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v9ispecial1.2831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在非常复杂的政治中,颜色是选民的一种低级启发式思维,尤其是将竞选颜色作为政纲的象征。本研究旨在确定碧瑶大学师范与文理学院学生对 2022 年全国大选期间总统候选人所选不同颜色的普遍意义的认同程度;对总统候选人的政治色彩及其在其政治纲领中的代表性的认同程度;以及这些所选政治色彩是否与总统候选人的纲领相一致。本研究采用了一种混合方法,即使用李克特量表自制问卷以确定 143 名受访者的同意程度,并对学生中的 8 名信息提供者进行访谈。研究显示,红色是最容易被误解的颜色,因为它的历史和心理内涵导致了它的负面象征意义。而粉色和蓝色则因其心理、文化和政治方面的因素而呈现出积极的结果。此外,除了马科斯的红色与其关于团结的政纲相一致外,其他颜色都与其政纲相一致。此外,总统候选人的政纲是基于他们的个人和政治因素。总之,研究表明,在我国,政治色彩仍然没有确定的含义,选民仍然对色彩真正代表的含义存在争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Political Branding: The use of campaign color as symbolism of platforms among the presidential candidates in the 2022 elections
In a very complex nature of politics, color serves as a low-level heuristic for voters, especially the use of campaign color as a symbolism of platforms. This study sought to determine the level of agreement on the universal meaning of the different colors chosen by the Presidential candidates during the 2022 national elections; the level of agreement if the political colors of the presidential candidates and its representation to their political platforms; and if these chosen political colors correspond to the platforms of the presidential candidates among the students of the School of Teachers and Liberal Arts of the University of Baguio. A mixed method with a self-constructed questionnaire using the Likert Scale to determine the level of agreement among the 143 respondents and an interview with 8 informants among the students was used in this study. The study revealed that the color Red is the most misinterpreted color because of its historical and psychological connotations which led to its negative symbolism. While both Pink and Blue, showed a positive result because of their psychological, cultural, and political aspect. Furthermore, all colors aligned with their platforms except the color Red by Marcos with his platform about Unity. Additionally, the presidential candidates' platforms were based on their personal and political factors. Overall, the research suggests that there’s still no established meaning of political colors in our country and that voters still take issue with what the colors truly represent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信