{"title":"双定子机器的比较分析","authors":"C. Awah","doi":"10.4314/njtd.v21i1.1872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electromagnetic performance of three different types of double stator permanent magnet machine is analyzed and compared in this study. The analyzed machines in this study are Machine 1, Machine 2 and Machine 3. These machines are designated as: M 1, M 2 and M 3, respectively. The studies are implemented using two-dimensional and three-dimensional finite element analysis (2D-FEA and 3D-FEA) methods. The predicted performance indices are: total harmonic distortion of the voltage, torque ripple, cogging torque, winding inductances, output torque and unbalanced magnetic force (UMF). The studies show that the investigated machine types have negligible reluctance torque and thus, similar axes inductance values. Therefore, the machines’ bulk torque components are contributed mainly by the magnets while the armature excitation sources yield lesser torque components. Amongst the compared machines, M 3 type has an outstanding performance in almost all the performance metrics, compared to M 2 and M 1 types. Nevertheless, M 1 machine type has some good attributes, particularly, with respect to its high output torque per applied magnet volume, in addition to its widest operating speed range ability. Low-speed high-torque applications are most suitable for the investigated machines in practice.","PeriodicalId":31273,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Technological Development","volume":"82 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of dual stator machines\",\"authors\":\"C. Awah\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/njtd.v21i1.1872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Electromagnetic performance of three different types of double stator permanent magnet machine is analyzed and compared in this study. The analyzed machines in this study are Machine 1, Machine 2 and Machine 3. These machines are designated as: M 1, M 2 and M 3, respectively. The studies are implemented using two-dimensional and three-dimensional finite element analysis (2D-FEA and 3D-FEA) methods. The predicted performance indices are: total harmonic distortion of the voltage, torque ripple, cogging torque, winding inductances, output torque and unbalanced magnetic force (UMF). The studies show that the investigated machine types have negligible reluctance torque and thus, similar axes inductance values. Therefore, the machines’ bulk torque components are contributed mainly by the magnets while the armature excitation sources yield lesser torque components. Amongst the compared machines, M 3 type has an outstanding performance in almost all the performance metrics, compared to M 2 and M 1 types. Nevertheless, M 1 machine type has some good attributes, particularly, with respect to its high output torque per applied magnet volume, in addition to its widest operating speed range ability. Low-speed high-torque applications are most suitable for the investigated machines in practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nigerian Journal of Technological Development\",\"volume\":\"82 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nigerian Journal of Technological Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/njtd.v21i1.1872\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Technological Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/njtd.v21i1.1872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究对三种不同类型的双定子永磁电机的电磁性能进行了分析和比较。本研究分析的机器分别为机器 1、机器 2 和机器 3。这些机器被命名为M 1、M 2 和 M 3。研究采用二维和三维有限元分析(2D-FEA 和 3D-FEA )方法进行。预测的性能指标包括:电压总谐波失真、转矩纹波、齿槽转矩、绕组电感、输出转矩和不平衡磁力(UMF)。研究表明,所研究的机器类型的磁阻转矩可以忽略不计,因此轴电感值也相似。因此,机器的大部分转矩成分主要来自磁体,而电枢励磁源产生的转矩成分较少。与 M 2 和 M 1 机型相比,M 3 机型在几乎所有性能指标上都表现出色。不过,M 1 型机器也有一些优点,尤其是单位应用磁体体积输出扭矩大,而且工作速度范围最广。在实际应用中,低速高扭矩应用最适合所研究的机器。
Electromagnetic performance of three different types of double stator permanent magnet machine is analyzed and compared in this study. The analyzed machines in this study are Machine 1, Machine 2 and Machine 3. These machines are designated as: M 1, M 2 and M 3, respectively. The studies are implemented using two-dimensional and three-dimensional finite element analysis (2D-FEA and 3D-FEA) methods. The predicted performance indices are: total harmonic distortion of the voltage, torque ripple, cogging torque, winding inductances, output torque and unbalanced magnetic force (UMF). The studies show that the investigated machine types have negligible reluctance torque and thus, similar axes inductance values. Therefore, the machines’ bulk torque components are contributed mainly by the magnets while the armature excitation sources yield lesser torque components. Amongst the compared machines, M 3 type has an outstanding performance in almost all the performance metrics, compared to M 2 and M 1 types. Nevertheless, M 1 machine type has some good attributes, particularly, with respect to its high output torque per applied magnet volume, in addition to its widest operating speed range ability. Low-speed high-torque applications are most suitable for the investigated machines in practice.