评估治疗与药物相关的颌骨骨坏死的各种治疗方法:系统回顾

Mário Jorge Augusto de Andrade, Marilia Oliveira Coelho Dutra Leal, C. Jodas, Renato Assis Machado, A. Bachesk, R. G. Teixeira
{"title":"评估治疗与药物相关的颌骨骨坏死的各种治疗方法:系统回顾","authors":"Mário Jorge Augusto de Andrade, Marilia Oliveira Coelho Dutra Leal, C. Jodas, Renato Assis Machado, A. Bachesk, R. G. Teixeira","doi":"10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i45400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) is a significant and potentially debilitating side effect caused by antiresorptive and antiangiogenic drugs, which can lead to bone exposure in the oral cavity. However, the management of this condition remains controversial, with adjuvant therapies being employed despite limited scientific evidence. This systematic review aimed to identify effective therapeutic procedures for treating MRONJ. \nMethodology: A literature search was conducted without any temporal limitations. The PRISMA protocol was followed. To identify relevant studies, we developed electronic search strategies for various bibliographic databases, as Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. It was conducted a comprehensive analysis of 30 studies involving 2,079 patients from 35 countries to evaluate the effectiveness of various treatment approaches for MRONJ. \nResults: The systematic review revealed that long-term use of Zoledronic acid for approximately 452.04 months (±27.41; 12-102) exposed many patients (n=772) to the risk of MRONJ. Similarly, Alendronate use for approximately 104.4 months (±60.16; 6-180) also posed a risk, affecting 650 patients, while Pamidronate use for about 20.74 months (±4.94; 6-96) was associated with MRONJ risk in 121 patients. Among the treatment approaches, conservative surgical management was the most frequently employed (27.92%), followed by local debridement (13.57%) and conservative treatment (11.21%). Treatment complications were observed in 13.03% of cases, with the most frequent complications being resistant or worsening clinical stage of osteonecrosis, followed by incomplete mucosal healing or dehiscence and mental nerve injury. \nConclusion: While conservative surgical management, local debridement, and conservative treatment are commonly utilized approaches, the treatment of MRONJ lacks a standardized consensus due to the scarcity of scientific evidence. Further research and comprehensive studies are imperative to establish effective therapeutic strategies for managing this condition.","PeriodicalId":14869,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Various Therapeutic Approaches in Treating Medication-related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Mário Jorge Augusto de Andrade, Marilia Oliveira Coelho Dutra Leal, C. Jodas, Renato Assis Machado, A. Bachesk, R. G. Teixeira\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i45400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aims: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) is a significant and potentially debilitating side effect caused by antiresorptive and antiangiogenic drugs, which can lead to bone exposure in the oral cavity. However, the management of this condition remains controversial, with adjuvant therapies being employed despite limited scientific evidence. This systematic review aimed to identify effective therapeutic procedures for treating MRONJ. \\nMethodology: A literature search was conducted without any temporal limitations. The PRISMA protocol was followed. To identify relevant studies, we developed electronic search strategies for various bibliographic databases, as Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. It was conducted a comprehensive analysis of 30 studies involving 2,079 patients from 35 countries to evaluate the effectiveness of various treatment approaches for MRONJ. \\nResults: The systematic review revealed that long-term use of Zoledronic acid for approximately 452.04 months (±27.41; 12-102) exposed many patients (n=772) to the risk of MRONJ. Similarly, Alendronate use for approximately 104.4 months (±60.16; 6-180) also posed a risk, affecting 650 patients, while Pamidronate use for about 20.74 months (±4.94; 6-96) was associated with MRONJ risk in 121 patients. Among the treatment approaches, conservative surgical management was the most frequently employed (27.92%), followed by local debridement (13.57%) and conservative treatment (11.21%). Treatment complications were observed in 13.03% of cases, with the most frequent complications being resistant or worsening clinical stage of osteonecrosis, followed by incomplete mucosal healing or dehiscence and mental nerve injury. \\nConclusion: While conservative surgical management, local debridement, and conservative treatment are commonly utilized approaches, the treatment of MRONJ lacks a standardized consensus due to the scarcity of scientific evidence. Further research and comprehensive studies are imperative to establish effective therapeutic strategies for managing this condition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i45400\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i45400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:药物相关性颌骨骨坏死(MRONJ)是抗骨吸收和抗血管生成药物引起的一种严重且可能使人衰弱的副作用,可导致口腔骨暴露。然而,对这种情况的处理仍存在争议,尽管科学证据有限,但仍在使用辅助疗法。本系统综述旨在确定治疗 MRONJ 的有效治疗程序。研究方法:在没有时间限制的情况下进行文献检索。我们遵循了 PRISMA 协议。为确定相关研究,我们在 Cochrane、Embase、PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 等多个文献数据库中制定了电子检索策略。我们对来自 35 个国家、涉及 2,079 名患者的 30 项研究进行了综合分析,以评估各种治疗方法对 MRONJ 的有效性。结果:系统综述显示,长期使用唑来膦酸约 452.04 个月(±27.41;12-102),使许多患者(n=772)面临 MRONJ 风险。同样,阿仑膦酸钠使用约 104.4 个月(±60.16;6-180)也有风险,影响了 650 名患者,而帕米膦酸钠使用约 20.74 个月(±4.94;6-96)与 121 名患者的 MRONJ 风险有关。在治疗方法中,最常采用的是保守手术治疗(27.92%),其次是局部清创(13.57%)和保守治疗(11.21%)。13.03%的病例出现了治疗并发症,最常见的并发症是骨坏死耐药或临床阶段恶化,其次是粘膜不完全愈合或开裂以及精神神经损伤。结论虽然保守手术治疗、局部清创和保守治疗是常用的方法,但由于缺乏科学证据,MRONJ的治疗缺乏标准化共识。必须开展进一步的研究和全面的调查,以确立有效的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Various Therapeutic Approaches in Treating Medication-related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Systematic Review
Background and Aims: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) is a significant and potentially debilitating side effect caused by antiresorptive and antiangiogenic drugs, which can lead to bone exposure in the oral cavity. However, the management of this condition remains controversial, with adjuvant therapies being employed despite limited scientific evidence. This systematic review aimed to identify effective therapeutic procedures for treating MRONJ. Methodology: A literature search was conducted without any temporal limitations. The PRISMA protocol was followed. To identify relevant studies, we developed electronic search strategies for various bibliographic databases, as Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. It was conducted a comprehensive analysis of 30 studies involving 2,079 patients from 35 countries to evaluate the effectiveness of various treatment approaches for MRONJ. Results: The systematic review revealed that long-term use of Zoledronic acid for approximately 452.04 months (±27.41; 12-102) exposed many patients (n=772) to the risk of MRONJ. Similarly, Alendronate use for approximately 104.4 months (±60.16; 6-180) also posed a risk, affecting 650 patients, while Pamidronate use for about 20.74 months (±4.94; 6-96) was associated with MRONJ risk in 121 patients. Among the treatment approaches, conservative surgical management was the most frequently employed (27.92%), followed by local debridement (13.57%) and conservative treatment (11.21%). Treatment complications were observed in 13.03% of cases, with the most frequent complications being resistant or worsening clinical stage of osteonecrosis, followed by incomplete mucosal healing or dehiscence and mental nerve injury. Conclusion: While conservative surgical management, local debridement, and conservative treatment are commonly utilized approaches, the treatment of MRONJ lacks a standardized consensus due to the scarcity of scientific evidence. Further research and comprehensive studies are imperative to establish effective therapeutic strategies for managing this condition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信