预测大学生心血管代谢疾病风险的机器学习方法

Dhiaa Musleh, Ali Alkhwaja, Ibrahim Alkhwaja, Mohammed Alghamdi, Hussam Abahussain, Mohammed Albugami, Faisal Alfawaz, Said El-Ashker, M. Al-Hariri
{"title":"预测大学生心血管代谢疾病风险的机器学习方法","authors":"Dhiaa Musleh, Ali Alkhwaja, Ibrahim Alkhwaja, Mohammed Alghamdi, Hussam Abahussain, Mohammed Albugami, Faisal Alfawaz, Said El-Ashker, M. Al-Hariri","doi":"10.3390/bdcc8030031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Obesity is increasingly becoming a prevalent health concern among adolescents, leading to significant risks like cardiometabolic diseases (CMDs). The early discovery and diagnosis of CMD is essential for better outcomes. This study aims to build a reliable artificial intelligence model that can predict CMD using various machine learning techniques. Support vector machines (SVMs), K-Nearest neighbor (KNN), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and Gradient Boosting are five robust classifiers that are compared in this study. A novel “risk level” feature, derived through fuzzy logic applied to the Conicity Index, as a novel feature, which was previously unused, is introduced to enhance the interpretability and discriminatory properties of the proposed models. As the Conicity Index scores indicate CMD risk, two separate models are developed to address each gender individually. The performance of the proposed models is assessed using two datasets obtained from 295 records of undergraduate students in Saudi Arabia. The dataset comprises 121 male and 174 female students with diverse risk levels. Notably, Logistic Regression emerges as the top performer among males, achieving an accuracy score of 91%, while Gradient Boosting lags with a score of 72%. Among females, both Support Vector Machine and Logistic Regression lead with an accuracy score of 87%, while Random Forest performs least optimally with a score of 80%.","PeriodicalId":505155,"journal":{"name":"Big Data and Cognitive Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Risk of Cardiometabolic Disease among University Students\",\"authors\":\"Dhiaa Musleh, Ali Alkhwaja, Ibrahim Alkhwaja, Mohammed Alghamdi, Hussam Abahussain, Mohammed Albugami, Faisal Alfawaz, Said El-Ashker, M. Al-Hariri\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/bdcc8030031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Obesity is increasingly becoming a prevalent health concern among adolescents, leading to significant risks like cardiometabolic diseases (CMDs). The early discovery and diagnosis of CMD is essential for better outcomes. This study aims to build a reliable artificial intelligence model that can predict CMD using various machine learning techniques. Support vector machines (SVMs), K-Nearest neighbor (KNN), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and Gradient Boosting are five robust classifiers that are compared in this study. A novel “risk level” feature, derived through fuzzy logic applied to the Conicity Index, as a novel feature, which was previously unused, is introduced to enhance the interpretability and discriminatory properties of the proposed models. As the Conicity Index scores indicate CMD risk, two separate models are developed to address each gender individually. The performance of the proposed models is assessed using two datasets obtained from 295 records of undergraduate students in Saudi Arabia. The dataset comprises 121 male and 174 female students with diverse risk levels. Notably, Logistic Regression emerges as the top performer among males, achieving an accuracy score of 91%, while Gradient Boosting lags with a score of 72%. Among females, both Support Vector Machine and Logistic Regression lead with an accuracy score of 87%, while Random Forest performs least optimally with a score of 80%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Big Data and Cognitive Computing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Big Data and Cognitive Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc8030031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Big Data and Cognitive Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc8030031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肥胖症正日益成为青少年普遍关注的健康问题,并导致心脏代谢疾病(CMDs)等重大风险。为了获得更好的治疗效果,早期发现和诊断 CMD 至关重要。本研究旨在利用各种机器学习技术,建立一个能够预测 CMD 的可靠人工智能模型。本研究比较了支持向量机(SVM)、K-近邻(KNN)、逻辑回归(LR)、随机森林(RF)和梯度提升(Gradient Boosting)这五种稳健的分类器。为了提高所提模型的可解释性和判别特性,本研究引入了一种新的 "风险等级 "特征,该特征是通过将模糊逻辑应用于 Conicity 指数而得出的。由于 Conicity 指数得分表明了 CMD 风险,因此开发了两个单独的模型来分别处理不同的性别。我们使用从沙特阿拉伯 295 份本科生记录中获得的两个数据集对所提议模型的性能进行了评估。数据集包括 121 名男生和 174 名女生,他们的风险水平各不相同。值得注意的是,逻辑回归在男生中表现最佳,准确率达到 91%,而梯度提升落后,准确率为 72%。在女生中,支持向量机和逻辑回归都以 87% 的准确率遥遥领先,而随机森林的表现最差,只有 80%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Risk of Cardiometabolic Disease among University Students
Obesity is increasingly becoming a prevalent health concern among adolescents, leading to significant risks like cardiometabolic diseases (CMDs). The early discovery and diagnosis of CMD is essential for better outcomes. This study aims to build a reliable artificial intelligence model that can predict CMD using various machine learning techniques. Support vector machines (SVMs), K-Nearest neighbor (KNN), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and Gradient Boosting are five robust classifiers that are compared in this study. A novel “risk level” feature, derived through fuzzy logic applied to the Conicity Index, as a novel feature, which was previously unused, is introduced to enhance the interpretability and discriminatory properties of the proposed models. As the Conicity Index scores indicate CMD risk, two separate models are developed to address each gender individually. The performance of the proposed models is assessed using two datasets obtained from 295 records of undergraduate students in Saudi Arabia. The dataset comprises 121 male and 174 female students with diverse risk levels. Notably, Logistic Regression emerges as the top performer among males, achieving an accuracy score of 91%, while Gradient Boosting lags with a score of 72%. Among females, both Support Vector Machine and Logistic Regression lead with an accuracy score of 87%, while Random Forest performs least optimally with a score of 80%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信