{"title":"放射科住院医生和顾问医生在报告急诊头部 CT 扫描结果时的观察者之间的一致性","authors":"Yasrab Ismail, Sanobar Bughio, Najeeb Ahmed, Aqsa Munir, Fatma Qaiser, Afshan Sheikh","doi":"10.52916/jmrs244130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To determine the inter-observer agreement between resident and consultant radiologists in reporting emergency head CT scans. Materials and Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional retrospective study was performed in a tertiary care hospital Karachi from 1st October 2021 to 31st march 2022. Total of 111 number of patients of 18-70 years of age of either gender who underwent emergency Head CT scans were included. Patients who came for follow-up CT scans were excluded. CT findings were interpreted by the radiology resident on duty. Subsequently, these CT images were interpreted by a consultant radiologist, and the decision of both resident and faculty member CT was correlated for inter-observer agreement. Results: The mean age was 47.47 ± 14.20 years. The majority of the patients 46 (41.44%) were between 56 to 70 years of age. Out of these 111 patients, 72 (64.86%) were male and 39 (35.14%) were female with a ratio of 1.9:1. Discrepancy between resident and consultant radiologists in reporting emergency head CT scans is seen in 6 (5.41%) patients. Inter-observer agreement between resident and consultant radiologists in reporting emergency head CT scans was found to be 94.59% with a kappa “κ” value of 0.885 which showed a very strong agreement. Conclusion: This study concluded that little discrepancy was found in inter-observer agreement between the radiology residents and the faculty members for interpretation of CT images of Head.","PeriodicalId":503079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Research and Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Inter-Observer Agreement Between Resident and Consultant Radiologists in Reporting Emergency Head CT Scans\",\"authors\":\"Yasrab Ismail, Sanobar Bughio, Najeeb Ahmed, Aqsa Munir, Fatma Qaiser, Afshan Sheikh\",\"doi\":\"10.52916/jmrs244130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To determine the inter-observer agreement between resident and consultant radiologists in reporting emergency head CT scans. Materials and Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional retrospective study was performed in a tertiary care hospital Karachi from 1st October 2021 to 31st march 2022. Total of 111 number of patients of 18-70 years of age of either gender who underwent emergency Head CT scans were included. Patients who came for follow-up CT scans were excluded. CT findings were interpreted by the radiology resident on duty. Subsequently, these CT images were interpreted by a consultant radiologist, and the decision of both resident and faculty member CT was correlated for inter-observer agreement. Results: The mean age was 47.47 ± 14.20 years. The majority of the patients 46 (41.44%) were between 56 to 70 years of age. Out of these 111 patients, 72 (64.86%) were male and 39 (35.14%) were female with a ratio of 1.9:1. Discrepancy between resident and consultant radiologists in reporting emergency head CT scans is seen in 6 (5.41%) patients. Inter-observer agreement between resident and consultant radiologists in reporting emergency head CT scans was found to be 94.59% with a kappa “κ” value of 0.885 which showed a very strong agreement. Conclusion: This study concluded that little discrepancy was found in inter-observer agreement between the radiology residents and the faculty members for interpretation of CT images of Head.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Research and Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Research and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52916/jmrs244130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Research and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52916/jmrs244130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Inter-Observer Agreement Between Resident and Consultant Radiologists in Reporting Emergency Head CT Scans
Objectives: To determine the inter-observer agreement between resident and consultant radiologists in reporting emergency head CT scans. Materials and Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional retrospective study was performed in a tertiary care hospital Karachi from 1st October 2021 to 31st march 2022. Total of 111 number of patients of 18-70 years of age of either gender who underwent emergency Head CT scans were included. Patients who came for follow-up CT scans were excluded. CT findings were interpreted by the radiology resident on duty. Subsequently, these CT images were interpreted by a consultant radiologist, and the decision of both resident and faculty member CT was correlated for inter-observer agreement. Results: The mean age was 47.47 ± 14.20 years. The majority of the patients 46 (41.44%) were between 56 to 70 years of age. Out of these 111 patients, 72 (64.86%) were male and 39 (35.14%) were female with a ratio of 1.9:1. Discrepancy between resident and consultant radiologists in reporting emergency head CT scans is seen in 6 (5.41%) patients. Inter-observer agreement between resident and consultant radiologists in reporting emergency head CT scans was found to be 94.59% with a kappa “κ” value of 0.885 which showed a very strong agreement. Conclusion: This study concluded that little discrepancy was found in inter-observer agreement between the radiology residents and the faculty members for interpretation of CT images of Head.