用数据驱动的概率网络方法评估 CMIP 集合中的模型相似性

C. E. Graafland, Swen Brands, José Manuel Gutiérrez
{"title":"用数据驱动的概率网络方法评估 CMIP 集合中的模型相似性","authors":"C. E. Graafland, Swen Brands, José Manuel Gutiérrez","doi":"10.1175/aies-d-23-0073.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe different phases of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) provide ensembles of past, present, and future climate simulations crucial for climate change impact and adaptation activities. These ensembles are produced using multiple Global Climate Models (GCMs) from different modeling centres with some shared building blocks and inter-dependencies. Applications typically follow the ‘model democracy’ approach which might have significant implications in the resulting products (e.g. large bias and low spread). Thus, quantifying model similarity within ensembles is crucial for interpreting model agreement and multi-model uncertainty in climate change studies. The classical methods used for assessing GCM similarity can be classified into two groups. The a priori approach relies on expert knowledge about the components of these models, while the a posteriori approach seeks similarity in the GCMs’ output variables and is thus data-driven. In this study we apply Probabilistic Network Models (PNMs), a well established machine learning technique, as a new a posteriori method to measure inter-model similarities. The proposed methodology is applied to surface temperature fields of the historical experiments from the CMIP5 multi-model ensemble and different reanalysis gridded datasets. PNMs are capable to learn the complex spatial dependency structures present in climate data, including teleconnections operating on multiple spatial scales, characteristic of the underlying GCM. A distance metric building on the resulting PNMs is applied to characterize GCM model dependencies. The results of this approach are in line with those obtained with more traditional methods, but have further explanatory potential building on probabilistic model querying.","PeriodicalId":94369,"journal":{"name":"Artificial intelligence for the earth systems","volume":"37 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A data-driven probabilistic network approach to assess model similarity in CMIP ensembles\",\"authors\":\"C. E. Graafland, Swen Brands, José Manuel Gutiérrez\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/aies-d-23-0073.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe different phases of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) provide ensembles of past, present, and future climate simulations crucial for climate change impact and adaptation activities. These ensembles are produced using multiple Global Climate Models (GCMs) from different modeling centres with some shared building blocks and inter-dependencies. Applications typically follow the ‘model democracy’ approach which might have significant implications in the resulting products (e.g. large bias and low spread). Thus, quantifying model similarity within ensembles is crucial for interpreting model agreement and multi-model uncertainty in climate change studies. The classical methods used for assessing GCM similarity can be classified into two groups. The a priori approach relies on expert knowledge about the components of these models, while the a posteriori approach seeks similarity in the GCMs’ output variables and is thus data-driven. In this study we apply Probabilistic Network Models (PNMs), a well established machine learning technique, as a new a posteriori method to measure inter-model similarities. The proposed methodology is applied to surface temperature fields of the historical experiments from the CMIP5 multi-model ensemble and different reanalysis gridded datasets. PNMs are capable to learn the complex spatial dependency structures present in climate data, including teleconnections operating on multiple spatial scales, characteristic of the underlying GCM. A distance metric building on the resulting PNMs is applied to characterize GCM model dependencies. The results of this approach are in line with those obtained with more traditional methods, but have further explanatory potential building on probabilistic model querying.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial intelligence for the earth systems\",\"volume\":\"37 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial intelligence for the earth systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/aies-d-23-0073.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial intelligence for the earth systems","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/aies-d-23-0073.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

耦合模式相互比较项目(CMIP)的不同阶段提供了对气候变化影响和适应活动至关重要的过去、现在和未来气候模拟集合。这些模拟集合是利用来自不同建模中心的多个全球气候模型(GCMs)生成的,其中有一些共享的构建模块和相互依存关系。应用通常遵循 "模式民主 "的方法,这可能会对生成的产品产生重大影响(如偏差大、传播范围小)。因此,量化集合内的模式相似性对于解释气候变化研究中的模式一致性和多模式不确定性至关重要。用于评估 GCM 相似性的经典方法可分为两类。先验方法依赖于有关这些模型组成部分的专家知识,而后验方法则寻求 GCM 输出变量的相似性,因此是数据驱动的。在本研究中,我们将概率网络模型(PNMs)这一成熟的机器学习技术作为一种新的后验方法来测量模型间的相似性。提出的方法适用于 CMIP5 多模式集合历史实验的地表温度场和不同的再分析网格数据集。PNM 能够学习气候数据中存在的复杂空间依赖性结构,包括在多个空间尺度上运行的远程联系,这是基础 GCM 的特征。建立在 PNMs 基础上的距离度量可用于描述 GCM 模型依赖关系的特征。这种方法的结果与更多传统方法的结果一致,但在概率模型查询的基础上具有进一步的解释潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A data-driven probabilistic network approach to assess model similarity in CMIP ensembles
The different phases of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) provide ensembles of past, present, and future climate simulations crucial for climate change impact and adaptation activities. These ensembles are produced using multiple Global Climate Models (GCMs) from different modeling centres with some shared building blocks and inter-dependencies. Applications typically follow the ‘model democracy’ approach which might have significant implications in the resulting products (e.g. large bias and low spread). Thus, quantifying model similarity within ensembles is crucial for interpreting model agreement and multi-model uncertainty in climate change studies. The classical methods used for assessing GCM similarity can be classified into two groups. The a priori approach relies on expert knowledge about the components of these models, while the a posteriori approach seeks similarity in the GCMs’ output variables and is thus data-driven. In this study we apply Probabilistic Network Models (PNMs), a well established machine learning technique, as a new a posteriori method to measure inter-model similarities. The proposed methodology is applied to surface temperature fields of the historical experiments from the CMIP5 multi-model ensemble and different reanalysis gridded datasets. PNMs are capable to learn the complex spatial dependency structures present in climate data, including teleconnections operating on multiple spatial scales, characteristic of the underlying GCM. A distance metric building on the resulting PNMs is applied to characterize GCM model dependencies. The results of this approach are in line with those obtained with more traditional methods, but have further explanatory potential building on probabilistic model querying.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信