为成功实施欧盟 HTA 法规开展包容性民间社会对话:确保利益相关者和合作者适当参与的行动呼吁

Thomas Desmet, Elaine Julian, Walter Van Dyck, I. Huys, Steven Simoens, Rosa Giuliani, M. Toumi, Christian Dierks, Juliana Dierks, Anontella Cardone, F. Houÿez, Mira Pavlovic, Michael Berntgen, Peter Mol, Anja Schiel, Wim Goettsch, F. Gianfrate, S. Capri, James Ryan, P. Ducournau, O. Solà-Morales, Jörg Ruof
{"title":"为成功实施欧盟 HTA 法规开展包容性民间社会对话:确保利益相关者和合作者适当参与的行动呼吁","authors":"Thomas Desmet, Elaine Julian, Walter Van Dyck, I. Huys, Steven Simoens, Rosa Giuliani, M. Toumi, Christian Dierks, Juliana Dierks, Anontella Cardone, F. Houÿez, Mira Pavlovic, Michael Berntgen, Peter Mol, Anja Schiel, Wim Goettsch, F. Gianfrate, S. Capri, James Ryan, P. Ducournau, O. Solà-Morales, Jörg Ruof","doi":"10.3390/jmahp12010004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Stakeholder involvement has long been considered a success factor for a joint European health technology assessment (HTA) process, and its relevance is now anchored in the EU HTA Regulation’s (EU HTAR) legislative wording. Therefore, we aimed to explore the roles, challenges, and most important activities to increase the level of involvement per stakeholder group. Methods: At the 2022 Fall Convention of the European Access Academy (EAA), working groups addressed the involvement of patients, clinicians, regulators, health technology developers (HTD), and national HTA bodies and payers within the EU HTA process. Each working group revisited the pre-convention survey results, determined key role characteristics for each stakeholder, and agreed on the most important activities to fulfill the role profile. Finally, the activities suggested per group were prioritized by plenary group. Results: The prioritized actions for patients included training and capacity building, the establishment of a patient involvement committee, and the establishment of a patient unit at the EC secretariat. For clinicians, it included alignment on evidence assessment from a clinical vs. HTA point of view, capacity building, and standardization of processes. The most important actions for regulators are to develop joint regulatory-HTA guidance documents, align processes and interfaces under the regulation, and share discussions on post-licensing evidence generation. HTDs prioritized scientific advice capacity and the review of the scoping process, and further development of the scope of the assessment report fact checks. The top three actions for national HTA bodies and payers included clarification on the early HTD dialogue process, political support and commitment, and clarification on financial support. Conclusions: Addressing the activities identified as the most important for stakeholders/collaborators in the EU HTA process (e.g., in the implementation of the EU HTA Stakeholder Network and of the guidance documents developed by the EUnetHTA 21 consortium) will be key to starting an “inclusive civil society dialogue”, as suggested by the European Commission’s Pharmaceutical Strategy.","PeriodicalId":434317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Market Access & Health Policy","volume":"49 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Inclusive Civil Society Dialogue for Successful Implementation of the EU HTA Regulation: Call to Action to Ensure Appropriate Involvement of Stakeholders and Collaborators\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Desmet, Elaine Julian, Walter Van Dyck, I. Huys, Steven Simoens, Rosa Giuliani, M. Toumi, Christian Dierks, Juliana Dierks, Anontella Cardone, F. Houÿez, Mira Pavlovic, Michael Berntgen, Peter Mol, Anja Schiel, Wim Goettsch, F. Gianfrate, S. Capri, James Ryan, P. Ducournau, O. Solà-Morales, Jörg Ruof\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jmahp12010004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Stakeholder involvement has long been considered a success factor for a joint European health technology assessment (HTA) process, and its relevance is now anchored in the EU HTA Regulation’s (EU HTAR) legislative wording. Therefore, we aimed to explore the roles, challenges, and most important activities to increase the level of involvement per stakeholder group. Methods: At the 2022 Fall Convention of the European Access Academy (EAA), working groups addressed the involvement of patients, clinicians, regulators, health technology developers (HTD), and national HTA bodies and payers within the EU HTA process. Each working group revisited the pre-convention survey results, determined key role characteristics for each stakeholder, and agreed on the most important activities to fulfill the role profile. Finally, the activities suggested per group were prioritized by plenary group. Results: The prioritized actions for patients included training and capacity building, the establishment of a patient involvement committee, and the establishment of a patient unit at the EC secretariat. For clinicians, it included alignment on evidence assessment from a clinical vs. HTA point of view, capacity building, and standardization of processes. The most important actions for regulators are to develop joint regulatory-HTA guidance documents, align processes and interfaces under the regulation, and share discussions on post-licensing evidence generation. HTDs prioritized scientific advice capacity and the review of the scoping process, and further development of the scope of the assessment report fact checks. The top three actions for national HTA bodies and payers included clarification on the early HTD dialogue process, political support and commitment, and clarification on financial support. Conclusions: Addressing the activities identified as the most important for stakeholders/collaborators in the EU HTA process (e.g., in the implementation of the EU HTA Stakeholder Network and of the guidance documents developed by the EUnetHTA 21 consortium) will be key to starting an “inclusive civil society dialogue”, as suggested by the European Commission’s Pharmaceutical Strategy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":434317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Market Access & Health Policy\",\"volume\":\"49 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Market Access & Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jmahp12010004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Market Access & Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jmahp12010004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:长期以来,利益相关者的参与一直被认为是欧洲卫生技术联合评估 (HTA) 过程的一个成功因素,其相关性现已被纳入《欧盟卫生技术评估条例》(EU HTAR)的立法措辞中。因此,我们旨在探索各利益相关者群体在提高参与度方面的作用、挑战和最重要的活动。方法:在 2022 年欧洲就医学院(EAA)秋季大会上,各工作组讨论了患者、临床医生、监管机构、卫生技术开发人员 (HTD) 以及国家 HTA 机构和付款人在欧盟 HTA 流程中的参与问题。每个工作组都重新审视了会前调查结果,确定了每个利益相关者的关键角色特征,并就实现角色特征的最重要活动达成了一致意见。最后,全体会议对每个工作组建议的活动进行了优先排序。结果:患者优先考虑的行动包括培训和能力建设、成立患者参与委员会以及在执委会秘书处设立患者部门。对临床医生而言,包括从临床与 HTA 的角度统一证据评估、能力建设和流程标准化。对监管机构而言,最重要的行动是制定监管机构--HTA 联合指导文件,统一监管机构下的流程和界面,以及分享关于许可后证据生成的讨论。HTD优先考虑科学建议能力和范围界定流程审查,以及进一步发展评估报告事实核查的范围。国家 HTA 机构和支付方的前三项行动包括明确早期 HTD 对话流程、政治支持和承诺以及明确财政支持。结论:解决欧盟 HTA 进程中利益相关者/合作者认为最重要的活动(例如,实施欧盟 HTA 利益相关者网络和 EUnetHTA 21 联合体制定的指导文件),将是启动欧盟委员会制药战略所建议的 "包容性民间社会对话 "的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Inclusive Civil Society Dialogue for Successful Implementation of the EU HTA Regulation: Call to Action to Ensure Appropriate Involvement of Stakeholders and Collaborators
Objectives: Stakeholder involvement has long been considered a success factor for a joint European health technology assessment (HTA) process, and its relevance is now anchored in the EU HTA Regulation’s (EU HTAR) legislative wording. Therefore, we aimed to explore the roles, challenges, and most important activities to increase the level of involvement per stakeholder group. Methods: At the 2022 Fall Convention of the European Access Academy (EAA), working groups addressed the involvement of patients, clinicians, regulators, health technology developers (HTD), and national HTA bodies and payers within the EU HTA process. Each working group revisited the pre-convention survey results, determined key role characteristics for each stakeholder, and agreed on the most important activities to fulfill the role profile. Finally, the activities suggested per group were prioritized by plenary group. Results: The prioritized actions for patients included training and capacity building, the establishment of a patient involvement committee, and the establishment of a patient unit at the EC secretariat. For clinicians, it included alignment on evidence assessment from a clinical vs. HTA point of view, capacity building, and standardization of processes. The most important actions for regulators are to develop joint regulatory-HTA guidance documents, align processes and interfaces under the regulation, and share discussions on post-licensing evidence generation. HTDs prioritized scientific advice capacity and the review of the scoping process, and further development of the scope of the assessment report fact checks. The top three actions for national HTA bodies and payers included clarification on the early HTD dialogue process, political support and commitment, and clarification on financial support. Conclusions: Addressing the activities identified as the most important for stakeholders/collaborators in the EU HTA process (e.g., in the implementation of the EU HTA Stakeholder Network and of the guidance documents developed by the EUnetHTA 21 consortium) will be key to starting an “inclusive civil society dialogue”, as suggested by the European Commission’s Pharmaceutical Strategy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信