[评论]发热烟草制品以及科学评估和产品分类的重要性

Qeios Pub Date : 2024-03-14 DOI:10.32388/0mz6t2
Carrie Wade, Markus Nordlund, Gizelle Baker
{"title":"[评论]发热烟草制品以及科学评估和产品分类的重要性","authors":"Carrie Wade, Markus Nordlund, Gizelle Baker","doi":"10.32388/0mz6t2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proper assessment of heated tobacco products (HTPs), which are alternatives to cigarettes that heat rather than burn tobacco, is necessary to gain a full understanding of both the potential risks and benefits of these newer products. This includes understanding differences in HTP aerosol compared to cigarette smoke. Recent publications have attempted to characterize HTP emissions in order to provide guidance on relative risk and classification. However, improper representation of studies and misinterpretation of how products are designed and used has led to confusion about the relative risk of HTPs compared to cigarettes. This commentary provides clarification on these important issues with a focus on classification of emissions from the device.\n","PeriodicalId":500839,"journal":{"name":"Qeios","volume":"13 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Commentary] on Heated Tobacco Products and the Importance of Science-Based Assessments and Product Classification\",\"authors\":\"Carrie Wade, Markus Nordlund, Gizelle Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.32388/0mz6t2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Proper assessment of heated tobacco products (HTPs), which are alternatives to cigarettes that heat rather than burn tobacco, is necessary to gain a full understanding of both the potential risks and benefits of these newer products. This includes understanding differences in HTP aerosol compared to cigarette smoke. Recent publications have attempted to characterize HTP emissions in order to provide guidance on relative risk and classification. However, improper representation of studies and misinterpretation of how products are designed and used has led to confusion about the relative risk of HTPs compared to cigarettes. This commentary provides clarification on these important issues with a focus on classification of emissions from the device.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":500839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qeios\",\"volume\":\"13 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qeios\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32388/0mz6t2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qeios","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32388/0mz6t2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加热烟草制品(HTPs)是加热而非燃烧烟草的香烟替代品,要全面了解这些新产品的潜在风险和益处,就必须对其进行适当评估。这包括了解加热烟草气溶胶与香烟烟雾的不同之处。最近的出版物试图描述 HTP 排放的特征,以便为相对风险和分类提供指导。然而,由于研究表述不当以及对产品设计和使用方式的误读,导致人们对 HTP 与香烟相比的相对风险产生混淆。本评注对这些重要问题进行了澄清,重点是设备排放物的分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Commentary] on Heated Tobacco Products and the Importance of Science-Based Assessments and Product Classification
Proper assessment of heated tobacco products (HTPs), which are alternatives to cigarettes that heat rather than burn tobacco, is necessary to gain a full understanding of both the potential risks and benefits of these newer products. This includes understanding differences in HTP aerosol compared to cigarette smoke. Recent publications have attempted to characterize HTP emissions in order to provide guidance on relative risk and classification. However, improper representation of studies and misinterpretation of how products are designed and used has led to confusion about the relative risk of HTPs compared to cigarettes. This commentary provides clarification on these important issues with a focus on classification of emissions from the device.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信