后期维特根斯坦语言哲学研究

Yecheng Li
{"title":"后期维特根斯坦语言哲学研究","authors":"Yecheng Li","doi":"10.54254/2753-7048/42/20240803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wittgenstein puts forward two different theories of language in his philosophical career. This paper discusses the transformation from early Wittgenstein's theory to later Wittgensteins theory, and analyzes and evaluates the latter. Early Wittgenstein still adopted the western traditional philosophys mode of thinking , based his theory on ontology and languages image theory, and constructed an ideal artificial language to describe facts in the form of proposition. However, such theories and mode of thinking faced many difficulties and challenges, and the necessity and rationality of constructing an ideal language are questioned. Later Wittgenstein realized the countless ways in which language is used in daily life, and believed that each use of language in life should be regarded as a \"language game\". Given that, the proposition discussed in the earlier theory is just one of the countless \"language games\". Therefore, Wittgensteins early theory seems to oversimplify the use of language. Later Wittgenstein believed that in order to explore the meaning of language, we should not search for the essence from a metaphysical perspective, but should search for the form of human life and the daily use of language. This is the core of notion meaning is usage . The endless debate of philosophers for thousands of years, therefore, results from the fact that philosophers have been trapped in the dilemma of language and have vainly tried to overcome the upper limit of their mind. Later Wittgenstein thus classify the use of language into misuse and normal use, and reminded human to always reflect on their use of language. Although his theory seems to disobey the traditional mode of thinking of Western philosophy, it should be regarded as a great and valuable idea.","PeriodicalId":474531,"journal":{"name":"Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media","volume":"12 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Language in the Later Period\",\"authors\":\"Yecheng Li\",\"doi\":\"10.54254/2753-7048/42/20240803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Wittgenstein puts forward two different theories of language in his philosophical career. This paper discusses the transformation from early Wittgenstein's theory to later Wittgensteins theory, and analyzes and evaluates the latter. Early Wittgenstein still adopted the western traditional philosophys mode of thinking , based his theory on ontology and languages image theory, and constructed an ideal artificial language to describe facts in the form of proposition. However, such theories and mode of thinking faced many difficulties and challenges, and the necessity and rationality of constructing an ideal language are questioned. Later Wittgenstein realized the countless ways in which language is used in daily life, and believed that each use of language in life should be regarded as a \\\"language game\\\". Given that, the proposition discussed in the earlier theory is just one of the countless \\\"language games\\\". Therefore, Wittgensteins early theory seems to oversimplify the use of language. Later Wittgenstein believed that in order to explore the meaning of language, we should not search for the essence from a metaphysical perspective, but should search for the form of human life and the daily use of language. This is the core of notion meaning is usage . The endless debate of philosophers for thousands of years, therefore, results from the fact that philosophers have been trapped in the dilemma of language and have vainly tried to overcome the upper limit of their mind. Later Wittgenstein thus classify the use of language into misuse and normal use, and reminded human to always reflect on their use of language. Although his theory seems to disobey the traditional mode of thinking of Western philosophy, it should be regarded as a great and valuable idea.\",\"PeriodicalId\":474531,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media\",\"volume\":\"12 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/42/20240803\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/42/20240803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

维特根斯坦在其哲学生涯中提出了两种不同的语言理论。本文探讨了早期维特根斯坦理论向后期维特根斯坦理论的转变,并对后者进行了分析和评价。早期维特根斯坦仍然采用西方传统哲学的思维模式,他的理论以本体论和语言形象论为基础,构建了一种理想的人工语言,以命题的形式描述事实。然而,这种理论和思维模式面临着诸多困难和挑战,建构理想语言的必要性和合理性受到质疑。后来,维特根斯坦意识到日常生活中语言的使用方式数不胜数,认为生活中的每一次语言使用都应被视为一次 "语言游戏"。鉴于此,前面理论中讨论的命题只是无数 "语言游戏 "中的一个。因此,维特根斯坦的早期理论似乎过于简化了语言的使用。后来的维特根斯坦认为,要探索语言的意义,我们不应该从形而上学的角度去寻找本质,而应该从人类生活的形式和语言的日常使用中去寻找。这就是 "意义即用法 "这一概念的核心。因此,几千年来哲学家们无休止的争论,源于哲学家们陷入了语言的困境,妄图突破思维的上限。后来维特根斯坦由此将语言的使用分为误用和正常使用,并提醒人类要时刻反思自己的语言使用。尽管他的理论似乎有悖于西方哲学的传统思维模式,但应被视为一种伟大而有价值的思想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research on Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Language in the Later Period
Wittgenstein puts forward two different theories of language in his philosophical career. This paper discusses the transformation from early Wittgenstein's theory to later Wittgensteins theory, and analyzes and evaluates the latter. Early Wittgenstein still adopted the western traditional philosophys mode of thinking , based his theory on ontology and languages image theory, and constructed an ideal artificial language to describe facts in the form of proposition. However, such theories and mode of thinking faced many difficulties and challenges, and the necessity and rationality of constructing an ideal language are questioned. Later Wittgenstein realized the countless ways in which language is used in daily life, and believed that each use of language in life should be regarded as a "language game". Given that, the proposition discussed in the earlier theory is just one of the countless "language games". Therefore, Wittgensteins early theory seems to oversimplify the use of language. Later Wittgenstein believed that in order to explore the meaning of language, we should not search for the essence from a metaphysical perspective, but should search for the form of human life and the daily use of language. This is the core of notion meaning is usage . The endless debate of philosophers for thousands of years, therefore, results from the fact that philosophers have been trapped in the dilemma of language and have vainly tried to overcome the upper limit of their mind. Later Wittgenstein thus classify the use of language into misuse and normal use, and reminded human to always reflect on their use of language. Although his theory seems to disobey the traditional mode of thinking of Western philosophy, it should be regarded as a great and valuable idea.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信