探索供应链中敏捷方法、应变能力和环境、社会和公司治理的相互作用:

Exacta Pub Date : 2024-03-14 DOI:10.5585/2024.25048
Susan Meireles Christiano Dantas, Angélica Alebrant Mendes
{"title":"探索供应链中敏捷方法、应变能力和环境、社会和公司治理的相互作用:","authors":"Susan Meireles Christiano Dantas, Angélica Alebrant Mendes","doi":"10.5585/2024.25048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, increased competitiveness and the risk of value chain disruption have highlighted the importance of traditional themes like agile methodologies and resilience. In addition, the adoption of ESG frameworks in investment decision-making gained momentum in 2018. However, ESG practices are still limited in many companies, and their relationship with internal areas such as the supply chain lacks sufficient research. The exploration of how ESG and agility affect supply chain resilience is in its preliminary stages, leading to a lack of extensive literature on the subject. This study aims to conduct a bibliometric review and qualitative content analysis to explore the interplay between concepts that have not been integrated so far. A total of 58 articles published between 2013 and October 2022 were subjected to descriptive and content analysis, resulting in the main trends, research gaps, and future research directions, alongside the classification of the study approach for the authors and their correlation between ESG pillars. The qualitative analysis of the content revealed that the most eligible articles classified the resilience–agility concepts as interdependent, emphasizing the common aspects of these concepts. Regarding ESG, the analysis shows the focus of existent research relies on financial performance and operational performance within the supply chain. Each study approach highlights one pillar of ESG, the dependent study approach emphasizes the significance of financial performance, while the independent approach places a stronger focus on operational performance.","PeriodicalId":30294,"journal":{"name":"Exacta","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Interplay of Agile Methodologies, Resilience, and ESG in Supply Chains:\",\"authors\":\"Susan Meireles Christiano Dantas, Angélica Alebrant Mendes\",\"doi\":\"10.5585/2024.25048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, increased competitiveness and the risk of value chain disruption have highlighted the importance of traditional themes like agile methodologies and resilience. In addition, the adoption of ESG frameworks in investment decision-making gained momentum in 2018. However, ESG practices are still limited in many companies, and their relationship with internal areas such as the supply chain lacks sufficient research. The exploration of how ESG and agility affect supply chain resilience is in its preliminary stages, leading to a lack of extensive literature on the subject. This study aims to conduct a bibliometric review and qualitative content analysis to explore the interplay between concepts that have not been integrated so far. A total of 58 articles published between 2013 and October 2022 were subjected to descriptive and content analysis, resulting in the main trends, research gaps, and future research directions, alongside the classification of the study approach for the authors and their correlation between ESG pillars. The qualitative analysis of the content revealed that the most eligible articles classified the resilience–agility concepts as interdependent, emphasizing the common aspects of these concepts. Regarding ESG, the analysis shows the focus of existent research relies on financial performance and operational performance within the supply chain. Each study approach highlights one pillar of ESG, the dependent study approach emphasizes the significance of financial performance, while the independent approach places a stronger focus on operational performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exacta\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exacta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5585/2024.25048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exacta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5585/2024.25048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,竞争力的增强和价值链中断的风险凸显了敏捷方法和弹性等传统主题的重要性。此外,在投资决策中采用 ESG 框架的势头在 2018 年也有所增强。然而,许多公司的 ESG 实践仍然有限,其与供应链等内部领域的关系也缺乏足够的研究。关于 ESG 和敏捷性如何影响供应链复原力的探索尚处于初步阶段,导致缺乏大量相关文献。本研究旨在通过文献计量学回顾和定性内容分析,探索迄今为止尚未整合的概念之间的相互作用。本研究对 2013 年至 2022 年 10 月间发表的共 58 篇文章进行了描述性分析和内容分析,得出了主要趋势、研究空白和未来研究方向,并对作者的研究方法及其与 ESG 支柱之间的相关性进行了分类。对内容的定性分析显示,大多数符合条件的文章将复原力-敏捷性概念归类为相互依存的概念,强调了这些概念的共同点。关于环境、社会和治理,分析表明现有研究的重点是供应链中的财务绩效和运营绩效。每种研究方法都突出了环境、社会和治理的一个支柱,从属研究方法强调财务绩效的重要性,而独立研究方法则更加关注运营绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Interplay of Agile Methodologies, Resilience, and ESG in Supply Chains:
In recent years, increased competitiveness and the risk of value chain disruption have highlighted the importance of traditional themes like agile methodologies and resilience. In addition, the adoption of ESG frameworks in investment decision-making gained momentum in 2018. However, ESG practices are still limited in many companies, and their relationship with internal areas such as the supply chain lacks sufficient research. The exploration of how ESG and agility affect supply chain resilience is in its preliminary stages, leading to a lack of extensive literature on the subject. This study aims to conduct a bibliometric review and qualitative content analysis to explore the interplay between concepts that have not been integrated so far. A total of 58 articles published between 2013 and October 2022 were subjected to descriptive and content analysis, resulting in the main trends, research gaps, and future research directions, alongside the classification of the study approach for the authors and their correlation between ESG pillars. The qualitative analysis of the content revealed that the most eligible articles classified the resilience–agility concepts as interdependent, emphasizing the common aspects of these concepts. Regarding ESG, the analysis shows the focus of existent research relies on financial performance and operational performance within the supply chain. Each study approach highlights one pillar of ESG, the dependent study approach emphasizes the significance of financial performance, while the independent approach places a stronger focus on operational performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信