伏立诺他、替莫唑胺(TMZ)或贝伐珠单抗(BEV)联合放疗和贝伐珠单抗/TMZ维持治疗小儿高级别胶质瘤:儿童肿瘤学组研究

R. Lulla, A. Buxton, Mark D Krailo, Margot A. Lazow, D. Boue, James L Leach, T. Lin, James I Geller, S. Kumar, Marina N Nikiforova, Uma Chandran, Sachin S Jogal, Marvin D Nelson, A. Onar-Thomas, D. Haas-Kogan, Kenneth J Cohen, M. Kieran, A. Gajjar, R. Drissi, Ian F Pollack, M. Fouladi
{"title":"伏立诺他、替莫唑胺(TMZ)或贝伐珠单抗(BEV)联合放疗和贝伐珠单抗/TMZ维持治疗小儿高级别胶质瘤:儿童肿瘤学组研究","authors":"R. Lulla, A. Buxton, Mark D Krailo, Margot A. Lazow, D. Boue, James L Leach, T. Lin, James I Geller, S. Kumar, Marina N Nikiforova, Uma Chandran, Sachin S Jogal, Marvin D Nelson, A. Onar-Thomas, D. Haas-Kogan, Kenneth J Cohen, M. Kieran, A. Gajjar, R. Drissi, Ian F Pollack, M. Fouladi","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdae035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Outcomes for children with high-grade gliomas (HGG) remain poor. This multicenter phase II trial evaluated whether concurrent use of vorinostat or bevacizumab with focal radiotherapy (RT) improved 1-year event-free survival (EFS) compared to temozolomide in children with newly-diagnosed HGG who received maintenance temozolomide and bevacizumab.\n \n \n \n Patients ≥3 and <22 years with localized, non-brainstem HGG were randomized to receive RT (dose 54-59.4Gy) with vorinostat, temozolomide, or bevacizumab followed by 12 cycles of bevacizumab and temozolomide maintenance therapy.\n \n \n \n Among 90 patients randomized, the 1-year EFS for concurrent bevacizumab, vorinostat, or temozolomide with RT was 43.8% (±8.8%), 41.4% (±9.2%) and 59.3% (±9.5%), respectively with no significant difference among treatment arms. Three- and 5-year EFS for the entire cohort was 14.8% and 13.4%, respectively with no significant EFS difference among the chemoradiotherapy arms. IDH mutations were associated with more favorable EFS (p=0.03), whereas H3.3 K27M mutations (p=0.0045) and alterations in PIK3CA or PTEN (p=0.025) were associated with worse outcomes. Patients with telomerase- and ALT-negative tumors (n=4) had an EFS of 100%, significantly greater than those with ALT or telomerase, or both (p=0.002). While there was no difference in outcomes based on TERT expression, high TERC expression was associated with inferior survival independent of telomere maintenance mechanism (p=0.0012).\n \n \n \n Chemoradiotherapy with vorinostat or bevacizumab is not superior to temozolomide in children with newly-diagnosed HGG. Patients with telomerase- and ALT-negative tumors had higher EFS suggesting that, if reproduced, mechanism of telomere maintenance should be considered in molecular-risk stratification in future studies.\n","PeriodicalId":19138,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology Advances","volume":"37 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vorinostat, temozolomide (TMZ) or bevacizumab (BEV) with irradiation and maintenance BEV/TMZ in pediatric high-grade glioma: A Children’s Oncology Group Study\",\"authors\":\"R. Lulla, A. Buxton, Mark D Krailo, Margot A. Lazow, D. Boue, James L Leach, T. Lin, James I Geller, S. Kumar, Marina N Nikiforova, Uma Chandran, Sachin S Jogal, Marvin D Nelson, A. Onar-Thomas, D. Haas-Kogan, Kenneth J Cohen, M. Kieran, A. Gajjar, R. Drissi, Ian F Pollack, M. Fouladi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/noajnl/vdae035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Outcomes for children with high-grade gliomas (HGG) remain poor. This multicenter phase II trial evaluated whether concurrent use of vorinostat or bevacizumab with focal radiotherapy (RT) improved 1-year event-free survival (EFS) compared to temozolomide in children with newly-diagnosed HGG who received maintenance temozolomide and bevacizumab.\\n \\n \\n \\n Patients ≥3 and <22 years with localized, non-brainstem HGG were randomized to receive RT (dose 54-59.4Gy) with vorinostat, temozolomide, or bevacizumab followed by 12 cycles of bevacizumab and temozolomide maintenance therapy.\\n \\n \\n \\n Among 90 patients randomized, the 1-year EFS for concurrent bevacizumab, vorinostat, or temozolomide with RT was 43.8% (±8.8%), 41.4% (±9.2%) and 59.3% (±9.5%), respectively with no significant difference among treatment arms. Three- and 5-year EFS for the entire cohort was 14.8% and 13.4%, respectively with no significant EFS difference among the chemoradiotherapy arms. IDH mutations were associated with more favorable EFS (p=0.03), whereas H3.3 K27M mutations (p=0.0045) and alterations in PIK3CA or PTEN (p=0.025) were associated with worse outcomes. Patients with telomerase- and ALT-negative tumors (n=4) had an EFS of 100%, significantly greater than those with ALT or telomerase, or both (p=0.002). While there was no difference in outcomes based on TERT expression, high TERC expression was associated with inferior survival independent of telomere maintenance mechanism (p=0.0012).\\n \\n \\n \\n Chemoradiotherapy with vorinostat or bevacizumab is not superior to temozolomide in children with newly-diagnosed HGG. Patients with telomerase- and ALT-negative tumors had higher EFS suggesting that, if reproduced, mechanism of telomere maintenance should be considered in molecular-risk stratification in future studies.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":19138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology Advances\",\"volume\":\"37 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高级别胶质瘤(HGG)患儿的治疗效果仍然不佳。这项多中心II期试验评估了与替莫唑胺相比,在接受替莫唑胺和贝伐单抗维持治疗的新诊断HGG儿童患者中,同时使用伏立诺他或贝伐单抗和病灶放疗(RT)是否能提高1年无事件生存期(EFS)。 年龄≥3岁且小于22岁的局部非脑干HGG患者被随机分配接受RT(剂量54-59.4Gy)与伏立诺司他、替莫唑胺或贝伐珠单抗治疗,然后接受12个周期的贝伐珠单抗和替莫唑胺维持治疗。 在90名随机患者中,贝伐单抗、伏立诺他或替莫唑胺与RT同时治疗的1年EFS分别为43.8%(±8.8%)、41.4%(±9.2%)和59.3%(±9.5%),各治疗组之间无显著差异。整个队列的三年和五年EFS分别为14.8%和13.4%,化放疗组之间的EFS无明显差异。IDH突变与较好的EFS相关(p=0.03),而H3.3 K27M突变(p=0.0045)和PIK3CA或PTEN改变(p=0.025)与较差的预后相关。端粒酶和ALT阴性肿瘤患者(4人)的EFS为100%,明显高于ALT或端粒酶阴性或两者均阴性的患者(p=0.002)。虽然TERT表达与预后没有差异,但TERC高表达与较差的生存率相关,与端粒维持机制无关(p=0.0012)。 对于新诊断为HGG的儿童患者,使用伏立诺他或贝伐单抗进行化放疗的效果并不优于替莫唑胺。端粒酶和ALT阴性肿瘤患者的EFS较高,这表明,如果端粒维持机制被证实,在未来的研究中,分子风险分层时应考虑端粒维持机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vorinostat, temozolomide (TMZ) or bevacizumab (BEV) with irradiation and maintenance BEV/TMZ in pediatric high-grade glioma: A Children’s Oncology Group Study
Outcomes for children with high-grade gliomas (HGG) remain poor. This multicenter phase II trial evaluated whether concurrent use of vorinostat or bevacizumab with focal radiotherapy (RT) improved 1-year event-free survival (EFS) compared to temozolomide in children with newly-diagnosed HGG who received maintenance temozolomide and bevacizumab. Patients ≥3 and <22 years with localized, non-brainstem HGG were randomized to receive RT (dose 54-59.4Gy) with vorinostat, temozolomide, or bevacizumab followed by 12 cycles of bevacizumab and temozolomide maintenance therapy. Among 90 patients randomized, the 1-year EFS for concurrent bevacizumab, vorinostat, or temozolomide with RT was 43.8% (±8.8%), 41.4% (±9.2%) and 59.3% (±9.5%), respectively with no significant difference among treatment arms. Three- and 5-year EFS for the entire cohort was 14.8% and 13.4%, respectively with no significant EFS difference among the chemoradiotherapy arms. IDH mutations were associated with more favorable EFS (p=0.03), whereas H3.3 K27M mutations (p=0.0045) and alterations in PIK3CA or PTEN (p=0.025) were associated with worse outcomes. Patients with telomerase- and ALT-negative tumors (n=4) had an EFS of 100%, significantly greater than those with ALT or telomerase, or both (p=0.002). While there was no difference in outcomes based on TERT expression, high TERC expression was associated with inferior survival independent of telomere maintenance mechanism (p=0.0012). Chemoradiotherapy with vorinostat or bevacizumab is not superior to temozolomide in children with newly-diagnosed HGG. Patients with telomerase- and ALT-negative tumors had higher EFS suggesting that, if reproduced, mechanism of telomere maintenance should be considered in molecular-risk stratification in future studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信