R. Lulla, A. Buxton, Mark D Krailo, Margot A. Lazow, D. Boue, James L Leach, T. Lin, James I Geller, S. Kumar, Marina N Nikiforova, Uma Chandran, Sachin S Jogal, Marvin D Nelson, A. Onar-Thomas, D. Haas-Kogan, Kenneth J Cohen, M. Kieran, A. Gajjar, R. Drissi, Ian F Pollack, M. Fouladi
{"title":"伏立诺他、替莫唑胺(TMZ)或贝伐珠单抗(BEV)联合放疗和贝伐珠单抗/TMZ维持治疗小儿高级别胶质瘤:儿童肿瘤学组研究","authors":"R. Lulla, A. Buxton, Mark D Krailo, Margot A. Lazow, D. Boue, James L Leach, T. Lin, James I Geller, S. Kumar, Marina N Nikiforova, Uma Chandran, Sachin S Jogal, Marvin D Nelson, A. Onar-Thomas, D. Haas-Kogan, Kenneth J Cohen, M. Kieran, A. Gajjar, R. Drissi, Ian F Pollack, M. Fouladi","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdae035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Outcomes for children with high-grade gliomas (HGG) remain poor. This multicenter phase II trial evaluated whether concurrent use of vorinostat or bevacizumab with focal radiotherapy (RT) improved 1-year event-free survival (EFS) compared to temozolomide in children with newly-diagnosed HGG who received maintenance temozolomide and bevacizumab.\n \n \n \n Patients ≥3 and <22 years with localized, non-brainstem HGG were randomized to receive RT (dose 54-59.4Gy) with vorinostat, temozolomide, or bevacizumab followed by 12 cycles of bevacizumab and temozolomide maintenance therapy.\n \n \n \n Among 90 patients randomized, the 1-year EFS for concurrent bevacizumab, vorinostat, or temozolomide with RT was 43.8% (±8.8%), 41.4% (±9.2%) and 59.3% (±9.5%), respectively with no significant difference among treatment arms. Three- and 5-year EFS for the entire cohort was 14.8% and 13.4%, respectively with no significant EFS difference among the chemoradiotherapy arms. IDH mutations were associated with more favorable EFS (p=0.03), whereas H3.3 K27M mutations (p=0.0045) and alterations in PIK3CA or PTEN (p=0.025) were associated with worse outcomes. Patients with telomerase- and ALT-negative tumors (n=4) had an EFS of 100%, significantly greater than those with ALT or telomerase, or both (p=0.002). While there was no difference in outcomes based on TERT expression, high TERC expression was associated with inferior survival independent of telomere maintenance mechanism (p=0.0012).\n \n \n \n Chemoradiotherapy with vorinostat or bevacizumab is not superior to temozolomide in children with newly-diagnosed HGG. Patients with telomerase- and ALT-negative tumors had higher EFS suggesting that, if reproduced, mechanism of telomere maintenance should be considered in molecular-risk stratification in future studies.\n","PeriodicalId":19138,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology Advances","volume":"37 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vorinostat, temozolomide (TMZ) or bevacizumab (BEV) with irradiation and maintenance BEV/TMZ in pediatric high-grade glioma: A Children’s Oncology Group Study\",\"authors\":\"R. Lulla, A. Buxton, Mark D Krailo, Margot A. Lazow, D. Boue, James L Leach, T. Lin, James I Geller, S. Kumar, Marina N Nikiforova, Uma Chandran, Sachin S Jogal, Marvin D Nelson, A. Onar-Thomas, D. Haas-Kogan, Kenneth J Cohen, M. Kieran, A. Gajjar, R. Drissi, Ian F Pollack, M. Fouladi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/noajnl/vdae035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Outcomes for children with high-grade gliomas (HGG) remain poor. This multicenter phase II trial evaluated whether concurrent use of vorinostat or bevacizumab with focal radiotherapy (RT) improved 1-year event-free survival (EFS) compared to temozolomide in children with newly-diagnosed HGG who received maintenance temozolomide and bevacizumab.\\n \\n \\n \\n Patients ≥3 and <22 years with localized, non-brainstem HGG were randomized to receive RT (dose 54-59.4Gy) with vorinostat, temozolomide, or bevacizumab followed by 12 cycles of bevacizumab and temozolomide maintenance therapy.\\n \\n \\n \\n Among 90 patients randomized, the 1-year EFS for concurrent bevacizumab, vorinostat, or temozolomide with RT was 43.8% (±8.8%), 41.4% (±9.2%) and 59.3% (±9.5%), respectively with no significant difference among treatment arms. Three- and 5-year EFS for the entire cohort was 14.8% and 13.4%, respectively with no significant EFS difference among the chemoradiotherapy arms. IDH mutations were associated with more favorable EFS (p=0.03), whereas H3.3 K27M mutations (p=0.0045) and alterations in PIK3CA or PTEN (p=0.025) were associated with worse outcomes. Patients with telomerase- and ALT-negative tumors (n=4) had an EFS of 100%, significantly greater than those with ALT or telomerase, or both (p=0.002). While there was no difference in outcomes based on TERT expression, high TERC expression was associated with inferior survival independent of telomere maintenance mechanism (p=0.0012).\\n \\n \\n \\n Chemoradiotherapy with vorinostat or bevacizumab is not superior to temozolomide in children with newly-diagnosed HGG. Patients with telomerase- and ALT-negative tumors had higher EFS suggesting that, if reproduced, mechanism of telomere maintenance should be considered in molecular-risk stratification in future studies.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":19138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology Advances\",\"volume\":\"37 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Vorinostat, temozolomide (TMZ) or bevacizumab (BEV) with irradiation and maintenance BEV/TMZ in pediatric high-grade glioma: A Children’s Oncology Group Study
Outcomes for children with high-grade gliomas (HGG) remain poor. This multicenter phase II trial evaluated whether concurrent use of vorinostat or bevacizumab with focal radiotherapy (RT) improved 1-year event-free survival (EFS) compared to temozolomide in children with newly-diagnosed HGG who received maintenance temozolomide and bevacizumab.
Patients ≥3 and <22 years with localized, non-brainstem HGG were randomized to receive RT (dose 54-59.4Gy) with vorinostat, temozolomide, or bevacizumab followed by 12 cycles of bevacizumab and temozolomide maintenance therapy.
Among 90 patients randomized, the 1-year EFS for concurrent bevacizumab, vorinostat, or temozolomide with RT was 43.8% (±8.8%), 41.4% (±9.2%) and 59.3% (±9.5%), respectively with no significant difference among treatment arms. Three- and 5-year EFS for the entire cohort was 14.8% and 13.4%, respectively with no significant EFS difference among the chemoradiotherapy arms. IDH mutations were associated with more favorable EFS (p=0.03), whereas H3.3 K27M mutations (p=0.0045) and alterations in PIK3CA or PTEN (p=0.025) were associated with worse outcomes. Patients with telomerase- and ALT-negative tumors (n=4) had an EFS of 100%, significantly greater than those with ALT or telomerase, or both (p=0.002). While there was no difference in outcomes based on TERT expression, high TERC expression was associated with inferior survival independent of telomere maintenance mechanism (p=0.0012).
Chemoradiotherapy with vorinostat or bevacizumab is not superior to temozolomide in children with newly-diagnosed HGG. Patients with telomerase- and ALT-negative tumors had higher EFS suggesting that, if reproduced, mechanism of telomere maintenance should be considered in molecular-risk stratification in future studies.