控制土壤侵蚀的覆盖技术的性能和可采用性:卢旺达 Sebeya 集水区案例研究

Félicien Majoro, Romuald Bagaragaza, Concilie Mukamwambali, P. Nsengiyumva, Jean De Dieu Mutabaruka, Mathieu Ntakiyemungu, Claire Dusabemariya, Eric Buregeya Mbabazi, Jacqueline Nikuze, Jean D Amour Osiri, Athanase Twagirimana, Fidele Mbaraga
{"title":"控制土壤侵蚀的覆盖技术的性能和可采用性:卢旺达 Sebeya 集水区案例研究","authors":"Félicien Majoro, Romuald Bagaragaza, Concilie Mukamwambali, P. Nsengiyumva, Jean De Dieu Mutabaruka, Mathieu Ntakiyemungu, Claire Dusabemariya, Eric Buregeya Mbabazi, Jacqueline Nikuze, Jean D Amour Osiri, Athanase Twagirimana, Fidele Mbaraga","doi":"10.4314/gjpas.v30i1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil erosion is a pressing environmental concern that poses significant threats to agricultural productivity, watershed health, and ecosystem stability. This research investigates the performance and adoptability of mulching technology as a Soil Erosion Control Measure (SECM) within the Sebeya catchment. This study employed various methods including a review of existing literature, on-site visits, structured interviews, and focus group discussions to evaluate the factors contributing to soil erosion, its impacts, and the variety of SECM within the Sebeya catchment. Among the 96 farmers surveyed in this research, it was evident that the natural reasons for soil erosion in the Sebeya drainage area were often attributed to the intense rainfall (23%) and steep slopes (22%). Also, the influence of lack of SECM and the continuous ploughing is significant with 22% and 22% respectively. The availability of mulching materials can vary significantly based on the geographic location, agricultural practices, and economic factors. In the Sebeya catchment, mulching materials often sourced from crop residues and vegetative residues. To address the risks associated with soil erosion, various site-specific measures were recommended. Using the Universal Soil Erosion Equation (USLE) model, the suggested Soil Erosion Control measures (SECM) were simulated with a significant decrease in soil loss, dropping from 73.05 t/ha/y to 19.62 t/ha/y. By incorporating mulching technology into the recommended SECM to mitigate soil erosion, the soil erosion rates reduced to permissible soil loss from 19.62 t/ha/y to 11.26 t/ha/y. To effectively reduce the high rates of soil erosion to acceptable levels within the Sebeya drainage area, this study advocates for the implementation of the recommended site-specific soil erosion control measures combined with mulching, drainage channels, and the stabilizing grasses on the same farmland. Implementing SECM stands as the optimal choice for enhancing soil productivity while reducing sedimentation in downstream rivers and lakes. \n  \n ","PeriodicalId":12516,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance And Adoptability Of Mulching Technology To Control Soil Erosion: Case Study Of The Sebeya Catchment In Rwanda\",\"authors\":\"Félicien Majoro, Romuald Bagaragaza, Concilie Mukamwambali, P. Nsengiyumva, Jean De Dieu Mutabaruka, Mathieu Ntakiyemungu, Claire Dusabemariya, Eric Buregeya Mbabazi, Jacqueline Nikuze, Jean D Amour Osiri, Athanase Twagirimana, Fidele Mbaraga\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/gjpas.v30i1.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Soil erosion is a pressing environmental concern that poses significant threats to agricultural productivity, watershed health, and ecosystem stability. This research investigates the performance and adoptability of mulching technology as a Soil Erosion Control Measure (SECM) within the Sebeya catchment. This study employed various methods including a review of existing literature, on-site visits, structured interviews, and focus group discussions to evaluate the factors contributing to soil erosion, its impacts, and the variety of SECM within the Sebeya catchment. Among the 96 farmers surveyed in this research, it was evident that the natural reasons for soil erosion in the Sebeya drainage area were often attributed to the intense rainfall (23%) and steep slopes (22%). Also, the influence of lack of SECM and the continuous ploughing is significant with 22% and 22% respectively. The availability of mulching materials can vary significantly based on the geographic location, agricultural practices, and economic factors. In the Sebeya catchment, mulching materials often sourced from crop residues and vegetative residues. To address the risks associated with soil erosion, various site-specific measures were recommended. Using the Universal Soil Erosion Equation (USLE) model, the suggested Soil Erosion Control measures (SECM) were simulated with a significant decrease in soil loss, dropping from 73.05 t/ha/y to 19.62 t/ha/y. By incorporating mulching technology into the recommended SECM to mitigate soil erosion, the soil erosion rates reduced to permissible soil loss from 19.62 t/ha/y to 11.26 t/ha/y. To effectively reduce the high rates of soil erosion to acceptable levels within the Sebeya drainage area, this study advocates for the implementation of the recommended site-specific soil erosion control measures combined with mulching, drainage channels, and the stabilizing grasses on the same farmland. Implementing SECM stands as the optimal choice for enhancing soil productivity while reducing sedimentation in downstream rivers and lakes. \\n  \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":12516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/gjpas.v30i1.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/gjpas.v30i1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤侵蚀是一个紧迫的环境问题,对农业生产率、流域健康和生态系统稳定性构成重大威胁。本研究调查了在 Sebeya 流域将地膜覆盖技术作为土壤侵蚀控制措施 (SECM) 的性能和可采用性。这项研究采用了多种方法,包括查阅现有文献、实地考察、结构式访谈和焦点小组讨论,以评估造成土壤侵蚀的因素、其影响以及塞比亚集水区内各种 SECM 的情况。在接受调查的 96 位农民中,塞贝亚流域水土流失的自然原因通常归咎于强降雨(23%)和陡坡(22%)。此外,缺乏 SECM 和连续耕作的影响也很大,分别占 22% 和 22%。地膜覆盖材料的可用性会因地理位置、农业实践和经济因素而有很大不同。在 Sebeya 流域,覆盖材料通常来自作物秸秆和植物残体。为应对与土壤侵蚀相关的风险,建议采取各种因地制宜的措施。利用通用土壤侵蚀方程 (USLE) 模型模拟了建议的土壤侵蚀控制措施 (SECM),结果显示土壤流失量显著减少,从 73.05 吨/公顷/年降至 19.62 吨/公顷/年。通过在建议的水土流失控制措施中加入地膜覆盖技术,土壤流失率从 19.62 吨/公顷/年降至 11.26 吨/公顷/年。为了有效地将 Sebeya 流域内的高水土流失率降低到可接受的水平,本研究主张在同一农田中实施建议的特定地点水土流失控制措施,并结合覆盖物、排水沟和稳定草。实施 SECM 是提高土壤生产力,同时减少下游河流和湖泊沉积物的最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance And Adoptability Of Mulching Technology To Control Soil Erosion: Case Study Of The Sebeya Catchment In Rwanda
Soil erosion is a pressing environmental concern that poses significant threats to agricultural productivity, watershed health, and ecosystem stability. This research investigates the performance and adoptability of mulching technology as a Soil Erosion Control Measure (SECM) within the Sebeya catchment. This study employed various methods including a review of existing literature, on-site visits, structured interviews, and focus group discussions to evaluate the factors contributing to soil erosion, its impacts, and the variety of SECM within the Sebeya catchment. Among the 96 farmers surveyed in this research, it was evident that the natural reasons for soil erosion in the Sebeya drainage area were often attributed to the intense rainfall (23%) and steep slopes (22%). Also, the influence of lack of SECM and the continuous ploughing is significant with 22% and 22% respectively. The availability of mulching materials can vary significantly based on the geographic location, agricultural practices, and economic factors. In the Sebeya catchment, mulching materials often sourced from crop residues and vegetative residues. To address the risks associated with soil erosion, various site-specific measures were recommended. Using the Universal Soil Erosion Equation (USLE) model, the suggested Soil Erosion Control measures (SECM) were simulated with a significant decrease in soil loss, dropping from 73.05 t/ha/y to 19.62 t/ha/y. By incorporating mulching technology into the recommended SECM to mitigate soil erosion, the soil erosion rates reduced to permissible soil loss from 19.62 t/ha/y to 11.26 t/ha/y. To effectively reduce the high rates of soil erosion to acceptable levels within the Sebeya drainage area, this study advocates for the implementation of the recommended site-specific soil erosion control measures combined with mulching, drainage channels, and the stabilizing grasses on the same farmland. Implementing SECM stands as the optimal choice for enhancing soil productivity while reducing sedimentation in downstream rivers and lakes.    
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信