放疗靶体积和预后因素对原发灶不明的鳞状细胞癌颈淋巴结转移患者治疗效果的影响

А. V. Sheiko
{"title":"放疗靶体积和预后因素对原发灶不明的鳞状细胞癌颈淋巴结转移患者治疗效果的影响","authors":"А. V. Sheiko","doi":"10.18027/2224-5057-2024-14-1-47-55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The issues of the radiotherapy target volumes in cases of cervical lymph nodes metastases of squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (SCCUP) remain unresolved due to the lack of clinical studies. Escalation or de-escalation of treatment may be directly related to prognostic factors. Purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of treatment using ipsilateral (only involved side of the neck) or total (bilaterally neck and pharyngeal mucosa) radiation therapy (RT) and to analyze the influence of clinical factors on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).Methods: A retrospective non-randomized clinical trial was conducted. Two-year OS and PFS were assessed in 26 SCCUP patients, who underwent combined treatment, including radiation therapy. Inoperable patients received either definitive RT (3.85 %) or sequential chemoradiation therapy (CRT, 11.5 %), or concurrent CRT (3.85 %). Operable patients underwent neoadjuvant RT with lymph node dissection (34.6 %) or lymph node dissection with adjuvant RT (11.5 %) or adjuvant sequential CRT (7.7 %) or adjuvant concurrent CRT (27 %); 50 % of patients received RT in a dose of more than 60 Gy, in 50 % it was less than 60 Gy. In 54 % of patients, only the ipsilateral cervical lymph nodes were included in the irradiation volume while 46 % of patients received RT to the pharyngeal mucosa and lymph nodes of the neck bilaterally (total radiation therapy group).Results: The median follow-up was 17 months. The 2‑year OS was 71.5 % (95 % CI 49.3–85.3 %), the 2‑year PFS was 72.1 % (95 % CI 44.5–87.6 %). There were no significant differences in 2‑year OS between the ipsilateral and total radiotherapy groups (HR = 1.08 [0.29–4.06], p = 0.904). Only a factor of extranodal extension (ENE) had a statistically significant impact on OS (HR = 6.05 [1.45–25.19], p = 0.0134).Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference in 2‑year OS and PFS between the ipsilateral and total radiation therapy groups. A negative prognostic factor is the extranodal extension (ENE) of a metastatic tumor. Prospective randomized trials are needed.","PeriodicalId":513023,"journal":{"name":"Malignant tumours","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of the radiotherapy target volume and prognostic factors on the results of treatment of patients with cervical lymph nodes metastases of squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary\",\"authors\":\"А. V. Sheiko\",\"doi\":\"10.18027/2224-5057-2024-14-1-47-55\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The issues of the radiotherapy target volumes in cases of cervical lymph nodes metastases of squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (SCCUP) remain unresolved due to the lack of clinical studies. Escalation or de-escalation of treatment may be directly related to prognostic factors. Purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of treatment using ipsilateral (only involved side of the neck) or total (bilaterally neck and pharyngeal mucosa) radiation therapy (RT) and to analyze the influence of clinical factors on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).Methods: A retrospective non-randomized clinical trial was conducted. Two-year OS and PFS were assessed in 26 SCCUP patients, who underwent combined treatment, including radiation therapy. Inoperable patients received either definitive RT (3.85 %) or sequential chemoradiation therapy (CRT, 11.5 %), or concurrent CRT (3.85 %). Operable patients underwent neoadjuvant RT with lymph node dissection (34.6 %) or lymph node dissection with adjuvant RT (11.5 %) or adjuvant sequential CRT (7.7 %) or adjuvant concurrent CRT (27 %); 50 % of patients received RT in a dose of more than 60 Gy, in 50 % it was less than 60 Gy. In 54 % of patients, only the ipsilateral cervical lymph nodes were included in the irradiation volume while 46 % of patients received RT to the pharyngeal mucosa and lymph nodes of the neck bilaterally (total radiation therapy group).Results: The median follow-up was 17 months. The 2‑year OS was 71.5 % (95 % CI 49.3–85.3 %), the 2‑year PFS was 72.1 % (95 % CI 44.5–87.6 %). There were no significant differences in 2‑year OS between the ipsilateral and total radiotherapy groups (HR = 1.08 [0.29–4.06], p = 0.904). Only a factor of extranodal extension (ENE) had a statistically significant impact on OS (HR = 6.05 [1.45–25.19], p = 0.0134).Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference in 2‑year OS and PFS between the ipsilateral and total radiation therapy groups. A negative prognostic factor is the extranodal extension (ENE) of a metastatic tumor. Prospective randomized trials are needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":513023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Malignant tumours\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Malignant tumours\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2024-14-1-47-55\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malignant tumours","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2024-14-1-47-55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:由于缺乏临床研究,原发灶不明的鳞状细胞癌(SCCUP)宫颈淋巴结转移病例的放疗靶体积问题仍未解决。治疗升级或降级可能与预后因素直接相关。本研究旨在评估同侧(仅颈部受累侧)或全侧(双侧颈部和咽部粘膜)放疗(RT)的治疗效果,并分析临床因素对总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的影响:方法:进行了一项回顾性非随机临床试验。方法:进行了一项回顾性非随机临床试验,评估了26名SCCUP患者两年的OS和PFS,这些患者接受了包括放疗在内的综合治疗。不能手术的患者接受明确的 RT(3.85%)或序贯化放疗(CRT,11.5%),或同时接受 CRT(3.85%)。可手术患者接受了淋巴结清扫的新辅助 RT(34.6%)或淋巴结清扫辅助 RT(11.5%)或辅助序贯 CRT(7.7%)或辅助同期 CRT(27%);50% 的患者接受了剂量超过 60 Gy 的 RT,50% 的患者接受了剂量低于 60 Gy 的 RT。54%的患者的照射范围仅包括同侧颈部淋巴结,46%的患者接受了咽部粘膜和双侧颈部淋巴结的RT(全放疗组):中位随访时间为17个月。结果:中位随访时间为 17 个月,2 年 OS 为 71.5%(95% CI 49.3-85.3%),2 年 PFS 为 72.1%(95% CI 44.5-87.6%)。同侧放疗组和全放疗组的 2 年 OS 无明显差异(HR = 1.08 [0.29-4.06],P = 0.904)。只有结节外扩展(ENE)因素对OS有统计学意义的影响(HR = 6.05 [1.45-25.19], p = 0.0134):同侧放疗组和全放疗组的2年OS和PFS差异无统计学意义。转移性肿瘤的结节外扩展(ENE)是一个不利的预后因素。需要进行前瞻性随机试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of the radiotherapy target volume and prognostic factors on the results of treatment of patients with cervical lymph nodes metastases of squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary
Introduction: The issues of the radiotherapy target volumes in cases of cervical lymph nodes metastases of squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (SCCUP) remain unresolved due to the lack of clinical studies. Escalation or de-escalation of treatment may be directly related to prognostic factors. Purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of treatment using ipsilateral (only involved side of the neck) or total (bilaterally neck and pharyngeal mucosa) radiation therapy (RT) and to analyze the influence of clinical factors on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).Methods: A retrospective non-randomized clinical trial was conducted. Two-year OS and PFS were assessed in 26 SCCUP patients, who underwent combined treatment, including radiation therapy. Inoperable patients received either definitive RT (3.85 %) or sequential chemoradiation therapy (CRT, 11.5 %), or concurrent CRT (3.85 %). Operable patients underwent neoadjuvant RT with lymph node dissection (34.6 %) or lymph node dissection with adjuvant RT (11.5 %) or adjuvant sequential CRT (7.7 %) or adjuvant concurrent CRT (27 %); 50 % of patients received RT in a dose of more than 60 Gy, in 50 % it was less than 60 Gy. In 54 % of patients, only the ipsilateral cervical lymph nodes were included in the irradiation volume while 46 % of patients received RT to the pharyngeal mucosa and lymph nodes of the neck bilaterally (total radiation therapy group).Results: The median follow-up was 17 months. The 2‑year OS was 71.5 % (95 % CI 49.3–85.3 %), the 2‑year PFS was 72.1 % (95 % CI 44.5–87.6 %). There were no significant differences in 2‑year OS between the ipsilateral and total radiotherapy groups (HR = 1.08 [0.29–4.06], p = 0.904). Only a factor of extranodal extension (ENE) had a statistically significant impact on OS (HR = 6.05 [1.45–25.19], p = 0.0134).Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference in 2‑year OS and PFS between the ipsilateral and total radiation therapy groups. A negative prognostic factor is the extranodal extension (ENE) of a metastatic tumor. Prospective randomized trials are needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信