循环能量:呼吸频率的超越性相关性。贝叶斯分析法的回顾性观察研究

Aurio Fajardo-Campoverd, Luis Mamami-Cruz, Miguel Ibarra-Estrada, Ismael Maldonado-Beltrán, Angelo Roncalli, Ehab Daoud
{"title":"循环能量:呼吸频率的超越性相关性。贝叶斯分析法的回顾性观察研究","authors":"Aurio Fajardo-Campoverd, Luis Mamami-Cruz, Miguel Ibarra-Estrada, Ismael Maldonado-Beltrán, Angelo Roncalli, Ehab Daoud","doi":"10.53097/jmv.10093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The calculation of energy transfer in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), has multiple interpretations and proposals. The parameters described as safe to minimize mechanical ventilator-associated lung injury (VALI) include only static values in their conception, and dynamic variables have been relegated to a secondary role. Subjects and Methods Analytical, observational, retrospective study of patients hospitalized in a respiratory intensive care unit, with a diagnosis of severe ARDS due to SARS-CoV-2 in whom mechanical ventilator management was guided by the use of esophageal catheter for the calculation of ventilatory variables. Thirty-four patients were included in this study, 23.5 % were women and the mean body mass index was 34.9 kg/m2. The primary objective was to quantify the amount of energy (Mechanical Power MP) transmitted by using multiple known equations and the secondary objective was to find the variables best associated with such energy transfer and with the severity of ARDS using Bayesian analysis. Results A mean of 22.2 days on invasive mechanical ventilation was recorded. Baseline MPGattinoni averaged 21.4 J/min, which did not change significantly at 30 minutes (7.5%) or 24 hours (- 0.4%) from baseline, despite esophageal catheter-guided management. The Bayesian analyses used to calculate the a posteriori inclusion probability showed that respiratory rate was the only variable consistently related to energy transfer, regardless of the equation used for its calculation and the chronological time at which these equations were measured [baseline MPGattinoni: (mean, 0.89; 95% Cred Interval: 0.75 to 1.02), at 30 minutes: (mean, 1.09; 95% Cred Interval: 0.68 to 1.49), at 24 hours: (mean, 0.65; 95% Cred Interval: 0.01 to 1.03)] or [baseline MPModesto: (mean, 0.1; 95% Cred Interval: 0.09 to 0.1), at 30 minutes: (mean, 0.1; 95% Cred Interval: 0.09 to 0.1), at 24 hours: (mean, 0.1; 95% Cred Interval: 0.09 to 0.1)]. Conclusions In severe ARDS, it is essential to minimize VALI. The calculation of energy transfer, regardless of the equation used, should always be a dynamic objective to be measured. Respiratory rate is probably the most relevant dynamic variable in the genesis of VALI. Keywords: mechanical power, elastic power, respiratory rate, ARDS, COVID-19","PeriodicalId":73813,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mechanical ventilation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cyclic energy: the transcendental relevance of respiratory rate. A retrospective observational study with Bayesian analysis\",\"authors\":\"Aurio Fajardo-Campoverd, Luis Mamami-Cruz, Miguel Ibarra-Estrada, Ismael Maldonado-Beltrán, Angelo Roncalli, Ehab Daoud\",\"doi\":\"10.53097/jmv.10093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction The calculation of energy transfer in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), has multiple interpretations and proposals. The parameters described as safe to minimize mechanical ventilator-associated lung injury (VALI) include only static values in their conception, and dynamic variables have been relegated to a secondary role. Subjects and Methods Analytical, observational, retrospective study of patients hospitalized in a respiratory intensive care unit, with a diagnosis of severe ARDS due to SARS-CoV-2 in whom mechanical ventilator management was guided by the use of esophageal catheter for the calculation of ventilatory variables. Thirty-four patients were included in this study, 23.5 % were women and the mean body mass index was 34.9 kg/m2. The primary objective was to quantify the amount of energy (Mechanical Power MP) transmitted by using multiple known equations and the secondary objective was to find the variables best associated with such energy transfer and with the severity of ARDS using Bayesian analysis. Results A mean of 22.2 days on invasive mechanical ventilation was recorded. Baseline MPGattinoni averaged 21.4 J/min, which did not change significantly at 30 minutes (7.5%) or 24 hours (- 0.4%) from baseline, despite esophageal catheter-guided management. The Bayesian analyses used to calculate the a posteriori inclusion probability showed that respiratory rate was the only variable consistently related to energy transfer, regardless of the equation used for its calculation and the chronological time at which these equations were measured [baseline MPGattinoni: (mean, 0.89; 95% Cred Interval: 0.75 to 1.02), at 30 minutes: (mean, 1.09; 95% Cred Interval: 0.68 to 1.49), at 24 hours: (mean, 0.65; 95% Cred Interval: 0.01 to 1.03)] or [baseline MPModesto: (mean, 0.1; 95% Cred Interval: 0.09 to 0.1), at 30 minutes: (mean, 0.1; 95% Cred Interval: 0.09 to 0.1), at 24 hours: (mean, 0.1; 95% Cred Interval: 0.09 to 0.1)]. Conclusions In severe ARDS, it is essential to minimize VALI. The calculation of energy transfer, regardless of the equation used, should always be a dynamic objective to be measured. Respiratory rate is probably the most relevant dynamic variable in the genesis of VALI. Keywords: mechanical power, elastic power, respiratory rate, ARDS, COVID-19\",\"PeriodicalId\":73813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of mechanical ventilation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of mechanical ventilation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53097/jmv.10093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mechanical ventilation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53097/jmv.10093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的能量转移计算有多种解释和建议。被描述为可安全减少机械通气机相关肺损伤(VALI)的参数在其概念中仅包括静态值,而动态变量则被置于次要地位。研究对象和方法 对呼吸重症监护病房的住院病人进行分析、观察和回顾性研究,这些病人被诊断为因 SARS-CoV-2 导致的严重 ARDS,在使用食管导管计算通气变量的过程中,对他们进行机械呼吸机管理。本研究共纳入 34 名患者,其中 23.5% 为女性,平均体重指数为 34.9 kg/m2。研究的主要目的是利用多个已知方程量化能量传输量(机械功率 MP),次要目的是利用贝叶斯分析法找出与能量传输和 ARDS 严重程度最相关的变量。结果 有创机械通气平均持续 22.2 天。基线 MPGattinoni 平均为 21.4 焦耳/分钟,尽管在食管导管引导下进行了治疗,但在 30 分钟(7.5%)或 24 小时(- 0.4%)后与基线相比没有显著变化。用于计算后验纳入概率的贝叶斯分析表明,呼吸频率是唯一一个与能量转移持续相关的变量,无论其计算公式和测量这些公式的时间如何[基线 MPGattinoni:(平均值,0.89;95% 置信区间:0.75 至 1.02),基线 MPGattinoni:(平均值,0.89;95% 置信区间:0.75 至 1.02),基线 MPGattinoni:(平均值,0.89;95% 置信区间:0.75 至 1.02)]。75 to 1.02),30 分钟时:(平均值,1.09;95% 置信区间:0.68 to 1.49),24 小时时:(平均值,0.65;95% 置信区间:0.01 to 1.03)]或[基线 MPModesto:(平均值,0.1;95% 置信区间:0.09 至 0.1),30 分钟时:(平均值,0.1;95% 置信区间:0.09 至 0.1),24 小时时:(平均值,0.1;95% 置信区间:0.09 至 0.1)]。结论 在重症 ARDS 中,最大限度地降低 VALI 至关重要。能量转移的计算,无论使用何种方程,都应始终作为动态目标进行测量。呼吸频率可能是导致 VALI 的最相关动态变量。关键词:机械动力、弹性动力、呼吸频率、ARDS、COVID-19
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cyclic energy: the transcendental relevance of respiratory rate. A retrospective observational study with Bayesian analysis
Introduction The calculation of energy transfer in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), has multiple interpretations and proposals. The parameters described as safe to minimize mechanical ventilator-associated lung injury (VALI) include only static values in their conception, and dynamic variables have been relegated to a secondary role. Subjects and Methods Analytical, observational, retrospective study of patients hospitalized in a respiratory intensive care unit, with a diagnosis of severe ARDS due to SARS-CoV-2 in whom mechanical ventilator management was guided by the use of esophageal catheter for the calculation of ventilatory variables. Thirty-four patients were included in this study, 23.5 % were women and the mean body mass index was 34.9 kg/m2. The primary objective was to quantify the amount of energy (Mechanical Power MP) transmitted by using multiple known equations and the secondary objective was to find the variables best associated with such energy transfer and with the severity of ARDS using Bayesian analysis. Results A mean of 22.2 days on invasive mechanical ventilation was recorded. Baseline MPGattinoni averaged 21.4 J/min, which did not change significantly at 30 minutes (7.5%) or 24 hours (- 0.4%) from baseline, despite esophageal catheter-guided management. The Bayesian analyses used to calculate the a posteriori inclusion probability showed that respiratory rate was the only variable consistently related to energy transfer, regardless of the equation used for its calculation and the chronological time at which these equations were measured [baseline MPGattinoni: (mean, 0.89; 95% Cred Interval: 0.75 to 1.02), at 30 minutes: (mean, 1.09; 95% Cred Interval: 0.68 to 1.49), at 24 hours: (mean, 0.65; 95% Cred Interval: 0.01 to 1.03)] or [baseline MPModesto: (mean, 0.1; 95% Cred Interval: 0.09 to 0.1), at 30 minutes: (mean, 0.1; 95% Cred Interval: 0.09 to 0.1), at 24 hours: (mean, 0.1; 95% Cred Interval: 0.09 to 0.1)]. Conclusions In severe ARDS, it is essential to minimize VALI. The calculation of energy transfer, regardless of the equation used, should always be a dynamic objective to be measured. Respiratory rate is probably the most relevant dynamic variable in the genesis of VALI. Keywords: mechanical power, elastic power, respiratory rate, ARDS, COVID-19
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信