生物仿制药pembrolizumab RPH-075与Keytruda®相比在恶性肿瘤患者中的药代动力学、药效学和安全性研究

I.  V. Samoylenko, I. A. Pokataev, L. G. Zhukova, D. Stroyakovsky, R. V. Orlova, А. M. Mudunov, М. В. Pak, Е. V. Zernova, А. V. Sobolev, А. S. Mochalova, B. Y. Alekseev, М. I. Sekacheva, Е. V. Ledin, А. V. Petkova, Е. К. Khanonina, А. I. Podolyakina, V. А. Razzhivina
{"title":"生物仿制药pembrolizumab RPH-075与Keytruda®相比在恶性肿瘤患者中的药代动力学、药效学和安全性研究","authors":"I.  V. Samoylenko, I. A. Pokataev, L. G. Zhukova, D. Stroyakovsky, R. V. Orlova, А. M. Mudunov, М. В. Pak, Е. V. Zernova, А. V. Sobolev, А. S. Mochalova, B. Y. Alekseev, М. I. Sekacheva, Е. V. Ledin, А. V. Petkova, Е. К. Khanonina, А. I. Podolyakina, V. А. Razzhivina","doi":"10.18027/2224-5057-2024-14-1-56-66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody selectively blocking the interaction between the PD-1 receptor and its ligands. The drug RPH-075 is a biosimilar to the original Keytruda®.Objective: To establish the equivalence of pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, as well as pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters, safety, and immunogenicity of the drug RPH-075 compared to Keytruda® in patients with malignant tumors.Materials and Methods: This multicenter double-blind randomized study included 90 patients with melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer who were randomized into two treatment groups (RPH-075 and Keytruda ®) in 1:1 ratio. In both groups, pembrolizumab was administered as monotherapy at a dose of 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks until progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary aim of the study was to assess PK after the first administration. The primary endpoint for PK assessment was AUC(0–504), and for safety, it was the frequency of adverse events (AE). The decision on PK equivalence was planned to be made if the two-sided 90 % confidence interval (CI) for the geometric mean ratio of AUC(0–504) after a single administration of each drug would be within 80.00–125.00 %. Secondary endpoints included Cmax after the first administration, as well as the other PK, safety, and immunogenicity parameters. This study also assessed PK and PD parameters after multiple administrations, and a pilot efficacy assessment was planned.Results: This article presents the analysis of data from the first stage of the study (after the first drug administration with a 3‑week observation period). The data analysis was blinded, and the treatment groups were coded as A and B. The 90 % CI for the geometric mean ratio of AUC(0–504) after the administration of drug A to AUC(0–504) of drug B was 93.50–121.16 %, and for the ratio of B to A, it was 82.54–106.95 %. The obtained intervals met the specified equivalence limit of 80.00–125.00 %, allowing us to conclude that RPH-075 and original Keytruda® are PK equivalent. Both drugs demonstrated comparably high saturation of PD-1 receptors on CD4+ / CD8+ lymphocytes at the end of the first cycle (day 22). Binding antibodies to pembrolizumab were detected in 2 patients (one in each group) over the analyzed period, indicating comparably low immunogenicity for both drugs. Safety profile analysis during this period revealed 7 AEs in 4 patients in group A and 4 AEs in 3 patients in group B. The frequency of AEs did not significantly differ between the groups.Conclusions: PK, PD, immunogenicity, and safety parameters of the pembrolizumab biosimilar RPH-075 were equivalent to those of the original Keytruda®.","PeriodicalId":513023,"journal":{"name":"Malignant tumours","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of the biosimilar pembrolizumab RPH-075 compared to Keytruda® in patients with malignant neoplasms\",\"authors\":\"I.  V. Samoylenko, I. A. Pokataev, L. G. Zhukova, D. Stroyakovsky, R. V. Orlova, А. M. Mudunov, М. В. Pak, Е. V. Zernova, А. V. Sobolev, А. S. Mochalova, B. Y. Alekseev, М. I. Sekacheva, Е. V. Ledin, А. V. Petkova, Е. К. Khanonina, А. I. Podolyakina, V. А. Razzhivina\",\"doi\":\"10.18027/2224-5057-2024-14-1-56-66\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody selectively blocking the interaction between the PD-1 receptor and its ligands. The drug RPH-075 is a biosimilar to the original Keytruda®.Objective: To establish the equivalence of pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, as well as pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters, safety, and immunogenicity of the drug RPH-075 compared to Keytruda® in patients with malignant tumors.Materials and Methods: This multicenter double-blind randomized study included 90 patients with melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer who were randomized into two treatment groups (RPH-075 and Keytruda ®) in 1:1 ratio. In both groups, pembrolizumab was administered as monotherapy at a dose of 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks until progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary aim of the study was to assess PK after the first administration. The primary endpoint for PK assessment was AUC(0–504), and for safety, it was the frequency of adverse events (AE). The decision on PK equivalence was planned to be made if the two-sided 90 % confidence interval (CI) for the geometric mean ratio of AUC(0–504) after a single administration of each drug would be within 80.00–125.00 %. Secondary endpoints included Cmax after the first administration, as well as the other PK, safety, and immunogenicity parameters. This study also assessed PK and PD parameters after multiple administrations, and a pilot efficacy assessment was planned.Results: This article presents the analysis of data from the first stage of the study (after the first drug administration with a 3‑week observation period). The data analysis was blinded, and the treatment groups were coded as A and B. The 90 % CI for the geometric mean ratio of AUC(0–504) after the administration of drug A to AUC(0–504) of drug B was 93.50–121.16 %, and for the ratio of B to A, it was 82.54–106.95 %. The obtained intervals met the specified equivalence limit of 80.00–125.00 %, allowing us to conclude that RPH-075 and original Keytruda® are PK equivalent. Both drugs demonstrated comparably high saturation of PD-1 receptors on CD4+ / CD8+ lymphocytes at the end of the first cycle (day 22). Binding antibodies to pembrolizumab were detected in 2 patients (one in each group) over the analyzed period, indicating comparably low immunogenicity for both drugs. Safety profile analysis during this period revealed 7 AEs in 4 patients in group A and 4 AEs in 3 patients in group B. The frequency of AEs did not significantly differ between the groups.Conclusions: PK, PD, immunogenicity, and safety parameters of the pembrolizumab biosimilar RPH-075 were equivalent to those of the original Keytruda®.\",\"PeriodicalId\":513023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Malignant tumours\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Malignant tumours\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2024-14-1-56-66\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malignant tumours","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2024-14-1-56-66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介Pembrolizumab 是一种选择性阻断 PD-1 受体与其配体之间相互作用的人源化单克隆抗体。RPH-075 是 Keytruda® 的生物类似药:目的:确定RPH-075与Keytruda®在恶性肿瘤患者中的药代动力学(PK)特性、药效学(PD)参数、安全性和免疫原性的等效性:这项多中心双盲随机研究纳入了90名黑色素瘤和非小细胞肺癌患者,按照1:1的比例将他们随机分为两个治疗组(RPH-075和Keytruda ®)。两组患者均接受 pembrolizumab 单药治疗,剂量为 200 毫克,每 3 周静脉注射一次,直至病情进展或出现不可耐受的毒性反应。研究的主要目的是评估首次给药后的PK。PK评估的主要终点是AUC(0-504),安全性的主要终点是不良事件(AE)的发生频率。如果每种药物单次给药后 AUC(0-504)的几何平均比值的双侧 90% 置信区间 (CI) 在 80.00-125.00% 范围内,则计划做出 PK 等效的决定。次要终点包括首次给药后的 Cmax 以及其他 PK、安全性和免疫原性参数。该研究还评估了多次给药后的 PK 和 PD 参数,并计划进行试验性疗效评估:本文对研究第一阶段(首次给药后,观察期为 3 周)的数据进行了分析。给药后 AUC(0-504) 与 BUC(0-504) 的几何平均比值的 90 % CI 为 93.50-121.16%,B 与 A 的比值为 82.54-106.95%。得出的区间符合规定的等效限(80.00-125.00 %),因此我们可以得出结论,RPH-075 和原研药 Keytruda® 具有 PK 等效性。两种药物在第一个周期结束时(第22天),CD4+/CD8+淋巴细胞上的PD-1受体饱和度相当高。在分析期间,2 名患者(每组 1 人)检测到了与 pembrolizumab 的结合抗体,这表明两种药物的免疫原性都相当低。在此期间的安全性分析显示,A 组 4 名患者出现了 7 例 AE,B 组 3 名患者出现了 4 例 AE:结论:Pembrolizumab 生物仿制药 RPH-075 的 PK、PD、免疫原性和安全性参数与原研药 Keytruda® 相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of the biosimilar pembrolizumab RPH-075 compared to Keytruda® in patients with malignant neoplasms
Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody selectively blocking the interaction between the PD-1 receptor and its ligands. The drug RPH-075 is a biosimilar to the original Keytruda®.Objective: To establish the equivalence of pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, as well as pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters, safety, and immunogenicity of the drug RPH-075 compared to Keytruda® in patients with malignant tumors.Materials and Methods: This multicenter double-blind randomized study included 90 patients with melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer who were randomized into two treatment groups (RPH-075 and Keytruda ®) in 1:1 ratio. In both groups, pembrolizumab was administered as monotherapy at a dose of 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks until progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary aim of the study was to assess PK after the first administration. The primary endpoint for PK assessment was AUC(0–504), and for safety, it was the frequency of adverse events (AE). The decision on PK equivalence was planned to be made if the two-sided 90 % confidence interval (CI) for the geometric mean ratio of AUC(0–504) after a single administration of each drug would be within 80.00–125.00 %. Secondary endpoints included Cmax after the first administration, as well as the other PK, safety, and immunogenicity parameters. This study also assessed PK and PD parameters after multiple administrations, and a pilot efficacy assessment was planned.Results: This article presents the analysis of data from the first stage of the study (after the first drug administration with a 3‑week observation period). The data analysis was blinded, and the treatment groups were coded as A and B. The 90 % CI for the geometric mean ratio of AUC(0–504) after the administration of drug A to AUC(0–504) of drug B was 93.50–121.16 %, and for the ratio of B to A, it was 82.54–106.95 %. The obtained intervals met the specified equivalence limit of 80.00–125.00 %, allowing us to conclude that RPH-075 and original Keytruda® are PK equivalent. Both drugs demonstrated comparably high saturation of PD-1 receptors on CD4+ / CD8+ lymphocytes at the end of the first cycle (day 22). Binding antibodies to pembrolizumab were detected in 2 patients (one in each group) over the analyzed period, indicating comparably low immunogenicity for both drugs. Safety profile analysis during this period revealed 7 AEs in 4 patients in group A and 4 AEs in 3 patients in group B. The frequency of AEs did not significantly differ between the groups.Conclusions: PK, PD, immunogenicity, and safety parameters of the pembrolizumab biosimilar RPH-075 were equivalent to those of the original Keytruda®.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信