卡尔纳普之问与神学之谜

M. Björk
{"title":"卡尔纳普之问与神学之谜","authors":"M. Björk","doi":"10.51619/stk.v100i1.26100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this text, I develop my earlier argument on the possibility of a non-confessional theological inquiry, and hence an intellectual practice devoted to the classical theological problems that begin with reason rather than faith, at secular universities in Sweden, a country with no state church and many different religions and denominations. I answer the criticism against this tentative proposal by returning to Rudolf Carnap's discussion of Friedrich Gogarten's theological tractate Die religiöse Entscheidung (1921). The logical positivist was amazed that Gogarten was so boldly staking out a new area of reality, and he wanted to know how he could see what Gogarten saw. \"Gogarten can rightly say that I am blind\", Carnap wrote, and \"my non-seeing would not be an objection for him, but would only show that I am not (yet) one of the elect\". But Carnap continued by stating that this would lead to a relativistic outcome that he could not assent to due to his \"belief in reason\" (Vernunftglaube). Accepting Carnap's criticism of relativism but deconstructing the difference between what he called the question (die Frage) and the puzzle or mystery (das Rätsel), I show how theological questions still emerge in the sciences and that there is a link between questions and mysteries. Insisting that Carnap's own belief in reason is a good indication of the relation between die Frage and das Rätsel, and hence between science and what the logical positivist would describe as metaphysics, I argue that systematic theology not only has a prominent and vital role at a secular university, as the science that investigates shapes and discusses theological discourses wherever they appear. It also asks (and might even give tentative answers to) the problematic question of the truth of these discourses, since I show that Carnap's, ultimately Diltheyan, attempt to differentiate understanding (verstehen) from explanation (erklären), cannot hold. Theology is, in this sense, not only an attempt to describe and explain how different religions think. It is also a critical and philosophical discussion of these thought systems' meaning and truth content. Theology thereby reminds the university of the interconnection between science and mystery, truth and meaning.","PeriodicalId":38534,"journal":{"name":"Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift","volume":"113 S7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carnaps fråga och teologins gåta\",\"authors\":\"M. Björk\",\"doi\":\"10.51619/stk.v100i1.26100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this text, I develop my earlier argument on the possibility of a non-confessional theological inquiry, and hence an intellectual practice devoted to the classical theological problems that begin with reason rather than faith, at secular universities in Sweden, a country with no state church and many different religions and denominations. I answer the criticism against this tentative proposal by returning to Rudolf Carnap's discussion of Friedrich Gogarten's theological tractate Die religiöse Entscheidung (1921). The logical positivist was amazed that Gogarten was so boldly staking out a new area of reality, and he wanted to know how he could see what Gogarten saw. \\\"Gogarten can rightly say that I am blind\\\", Carnap wrote, and \\\"my non-seeing would not be an objection for him, but would only show that I am not (yet) one of the elect\\\". But Carnap continued by stating that this would lead to a relativistic outcome that he could not assent to due to his \\\"belief in reason\\\" (Vernunftglaube). Accepting Carnap's criticism of relativism but deconstructing the difference between what he called the question (die Frage) and the puzzle or mystery (das Rätsel), I show how theological questions still emerge in the sciences and that there is a link between questions and mysteries. Insisting that Carnap's own belief in reason is a good indication of the relation between die Frage and das Rätsel, and hence between science and what the logical positivist would describe as metaphysics, I argue that systematic theology not only has a prominent and vital role at a secular university, as the science that investigates shapes and discusses theological discourses wherever they appear. It also asks (and might even give tentative answers to) the problematic question of the truth of these discourses, since I show that Carnap's, ultimately Diltheyan, attempt to differentiate understanding (verstehen) from explanation (erklären), cannot hold. Theology is, in this sense, not only an attempt to describe and explain how different religions think. It is also a critical and philosophical discussion of these thought systems' meaning and truth content. Theology thereby reminds the university of the interconnection between science and mystery, truth and meaning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift\",\"volume\":\"113 S7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51619/stk.v100i1.26100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51619/stk.v100i1.26100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

瑞典是一个没有国家教会、有许多不同宗教和教派的国家,在这个国家的世俗大学中,我进一步论证了非教派神学探究的可能性,并由此提出了一种致力于解决以理性而非信仰为出发点的经典神学问题的知识实践。我通过回到鲁道夫-卡尔纳普(Rudolf Carnap)对弗里德里希-高加顿(Friedrich Gogarten)的神学小册子《Die religiöse Entscheidung》(1921 年)的讨论来回答对这一初步建议的批评。这位逻辑实证主义者对戈加腾如此大胆地开拓现实的新领域感到惊讶,他想知道自己如何才能看到戈加腾所看到的东西。卡纳普写道:"果加腾可以理直气壮地说,我是个瞎子","我的看不见对他来说不是反对意见,而只能说明我(还)不是选民之一"。但卡尔纳普接着说,这将导致一种相对主义的结果,而由于他 "相信理性"(Vernunftglaube),他不能同意这种结果。我接受了卡尔纳普对相对主义的批评,但解构了他所说的问题(die Frage)与谜题或神秘(das Rätsel)之间的区别,说明了神学问题是如何在科学中出现的,以及问题与神秘之间的联系。我坚持认为,卡纳普本人对理性的信仰很好地说明了 "问题 "与 "谜团 "之间的关系,以及科学与逻辑实证主义者所描述的形而上学之间的关系。它还能提出(甚至可能给出初步答案)这些论述的真理性这一难题,因为我表明,卡尔纳普(最终是狄尔泰)试图区分理解(verstehen)与解释(erklären)的做法是站不住脚的。从这个意义上说,神学不仅是描述和解释不同宗教如何思考的尝试。它也是对这些思想体系的意义和真理内容的批判性哲学讨论。因此,神学提醒大学注意科学与神秘、真理与意义之间的相互联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carnaps fråga och teologins gåta
In this text, I develop my earlier argument on the possibility of a non-confessional theological inquiry, and hence an intellectual practice devoted to the classical theological problems that begin with reason rather than faith, at secular universities in Sweden, a country with no state church and many different religions and denominations. I answer the criticism against this tentative proposal by returning to Rudolf Carnap's discussion of Friedrich Gogarten's theological tractate Die religiöse Entscheidung (1921). The logical positivist was amazed that Gogarten was so boldly staking out a new area of reality, and he wanted to know how he could see what Gogarten saw. "Gogarten can rightly say that I am blind", Carnap wrote, and "my non-seeing would not be an objection for him, but would only show that I am not (yet) one of the elect". But Carnap continued by stating that this would lead to a relativistic outcome that he could not assent to due to his "belief in reason" (Vernunftglaube). Accepting Carnap's criticism of relativism but deconstructing the difference between what he called the question (die Frage) and the puzzle or mystery (das Rätsel), I show how theological questions still emerge in the sciences and that there is a link between questions and mysteries. Insisting that Carnap's own belief in reason is a good indication of the relation between die Frage and das Rätsel, and hence between science and what the logical positivist would describe as metaphysics, I argue that systematic theology not only has a prominent and vital role at a secular university, as the science that investigates shapes and discusses theological discourses wherever they appear. It also asks (and might even give tentative answers to) the problematic question of the truth of these discourses, since I show that Carnap's, ultimately Diltheyan, attempt to differentiate understanding (verstehen) from explanation (erklären), cannot hold. Theology is, in this sense, not only an attempt to describe and explain how different religions think. It is also a critical and philosophical discussion of these thought systems' meaning and truth content. Theology thereby reminds the university of the interconnection between science and mystery, truth and meaning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift
Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信