环境噪声衰减 LMS 算法和 RLS 算法的性能比较

Amira Chiheb, Hassina Khelladi
{"title":"环境噪声衰减 LMS 算法和 RLS 算法的性能比较","authors":"Amira Chiheb, Hassina Khelladi","doi":"10.53375/ijecer.2024.383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to implement two different types of adaptive algorithms for the noise cancellation. The study explores the well-known least mean squares (LMS) adaptive algorithm, which is based on stochastic gradient descent approach, and its performances in terms of noise attenuation level and swiftness in active noise control (ANC). Another algorithm is considered in this investigation based upon the use of the least squares estimation (LSE), commonly named, the recursive least squares algorithm (RLS), and will be compared to the LMS. In order to evaluate the potential of each one, a few simulations are achieved. The numerical experiments are performed by using several real recordings of different environment noises tested on the two proposed adaptive algorithms. A comparison is emphasized regarding noise suppression ability and convergence speed, by implementing both adaptive algorithms on the same noise sources. From this numerical study, the RLS algorithm reveals a faster convergence speed and better control performances than the LMS algorithm.","PeriodicalId":507734,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Research","volume":"42 172","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Comparison of LMS and RLS Algorithms for Ambient Noise Attenuation\",\"authors\":\"Amira Chiheb, Hassina Khelladi\",\"doi\":\"10.53375/ijecer.2024.383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study is to implement two different types of adaptive algorithms for the noise cancellation. The study explores the well-known least mean squares (LMS) adaptive algorithm, which is based on stochastic gradient descent approach, and its performances in terms of noise attenuation level and swiftness in active noise control (ANC). Another algorithm is considered in this investigation based upon the use of the least squares estimation (LSE), commonly named, the recursive least squares algorithm (RLS), and will be compared to the LMS. In order to evaluate the potential of each one, a few simulations are achieved. The numerical experiments are performed by using several real recordings of different environment noises tested on the two proposed adaptive algorithms. A comparison is emphasized regarding noise suppression ability and convergence speed, by implementing both adaptive algorithms on the same noise sources. From this numerical study, the RLS algorithm reveals a faster convergence speed and better control performances than the LMS algorithm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Research\",\"volume\":\"42 172\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53375/ijecer.2024.383\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53375/ijecer.2024.383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是对噪声消除采用两种不同类型的自适应算法。研究探讨了著名的最小均方差(LMS)自适应算法(基于随机梯度下降方法)及其在主动噪声控制(ANC)中的噪声衰减水平和快速性方面的性能。本研究还考虑了另一种基于最小二乘估计(LSE)的算法,通常称为递归最小二乘算法(RLS),并将与 LMS 进行比较。为了评估每种算法的潜力,我们进行了一些模拟。数值实验使用了几段不同环境噪声的真实录音,对这两种自适应算法进行了测试。通过在相同噪声源上实施这两种自适应算法,强调了噪声抑制能力和收敛速度方面的比较。从这项数值研究来看,RLS 算法比 LMS 算法收敛速度更快,控制性能更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Comparison of LMS and RLS Algorithms for Ambient Noise Attenuation
The aim of this study is to implement two different types of adaptive algorithms for the noise cancellation. The study explores the well-known least mean squares (LMS) adaptive algorithm, which is based on stochastic gradient descent approach, and its performances in terms of noise attenuation level and swiftness in active noise control (ANC). Another algorithm is considered in this investigation based upon the use of the least squares estimation (LSE), commonly named, the recursive least squares algorithm (RLS), and will be compared to the LMS. In order to evaluate the potential of each one, a few simulations are achieved. The numerical experiments are performed by using several real recordings of different environment noises tested on the two proposed adaptive algorithms. A comparison is emphasized regarding noise suppression ability and convergence speed, by implementing both adaptive algorithms on the same noise sources. From this numerical study, the RLS algorithm reveals a faster convergence speed and better control performances than the LMS algorithm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信