Cassia Thaís Iurkiv Zanatta, Poliana Maria de Faveri Cardoso, Veridiana Camilotti, M. J. Mendonça, Júlio Katuhide Ueda
{"title":"自粘性复合树脂修复体的临床表现:文献综述","authors":"Cassia Thaís Iurkiv Zanatta, Poliana Maria de Faveri Cardoso, Veridiana Camilotti, M. J. Mendonça, Júlio Katuhide Ueda","doi":"10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i45405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Self-adhesive flowable composite resins are relatively new formulations on the market. These materials do not require the prior application of the adhesive system and, at the same time, can promote a durable seal at the tooth-restoration interface. However, there is little clinical information about these materials. Therefore, this review aimed to gather information on the clinical behavior of these self-adhesive materials by conducting a bibliographic search from 2010 to February 2024 in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Clinical follow-up studies of restorations performed with these materials were eligible for selection. The search terms used were “self-adhesive composite” or “self-adhesive flowable composite” where 14 complete articles were evaluated and 12 were selected. Only clinical follow-up studies of enamel and/or dentin restorations performed with self-adhesive resins were eligible for selection. This systematic review concluded that the self-adhesive flowable resin showed results comparable to those of the conventional flowable resin. However, studies have shown that for restorations in Class I and V cavities, self-adhesive flowable composite resin performed better than restorations in Class II cavities.","PeriodicalId":14869,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research","volume":"99 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Behavior of Self-Adhesive Composite Resin Restorations: Literature Review\",\"authors\":\"Cassia Thaís Iurkiv Zanatta, Poliana Maria de Faveri Cardoso, Veridiana Camilotti, M. J. Mendonça, Júlio Katuhide Ueda\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i45405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Self-adhesive flowable composite resins are relatively new formulations on the market. These materials do not require the prior application of the adhesive system and, at the same time, can promote a durable seal at the tooth-restoration interface. However, there is little clinical information about these materials. Therefore, this review aimed to gather information on the clinical behavior of these self-adhesive materials by conducting a bibliographic search from 2010 to February 2024 in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Clinical follow-up studies of restorations performed with these materials were eligible for selection. The search terms used were “self-adhesive composite” or “self-adhesive flowable composite” where 14 complete articles were evaluated and 12 were selected. Only clinical follow-up studies of enamel and/or dentin restorations performed with self-adhesive resins were eligible for selection. This systematic review concluded that the self-adhesive flowable resin showed results comparable to those of the conventional flowable resin. However, studies have shown that for restorations in Class I and V cavities, self-adhesive flowable composite resin performed better than restorations in Class II cavities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"99 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i45405\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i45405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
自粘性可流动复合树脂是市场上相对较新的配方。这些材料不需要事先涂抹粘合剂系统,同时还能促进牙齿修复界面的持久密封。然而,有关这些材料的临床信息却很少。因此,本综述旨在通过在 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus 和 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 数据库中进行从 2010 年到 2024 年 2 月的文献检索,收集有关这些自粘材料临床表现的信息。使用这些材料进行修复的临床随访研究符合入选条件。使用的检索词为 "自粘复合材料 "或 "自粘流动复合材料",共评估了 14 篇完整的文章,选出了 12 篇。只有使用自粘树脂进行牙釉质和/或牙本质修复的临床随访研究符合入选条件。该系统性综述认为,自粘性可流动树脂的效果与传统可流动树脂相当。不过,研究表明,对于 I 类和 V 类龋洞的修复,自粘性可流动复合树脂的效果优于 II 类龋洞的修复。
Clinical Behavior of Self-Adhesive Composite Resin Restorations: Literature Review
Self-adhesive flowable composite resins are relatively new formulations on the market. These materials do not require the prior application of the adhesive system and, at the same time, can promote a durable seal at the tooth-restoration interface. However, there is little clinical information about these materials. Therefore, this review aimed to gather information on the clinical behavior of these self-adhesive materials by conducting a bibliographic search from 2010 to February 2024 in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Clinical follow-up studies of restorations performed with these materials were eligible for selection. The search terms used were “self-adhesive composite” or “self-adhesive flowable composite” where 14 complete articles were evaluated and 12 were selected. Only clinical follow-up studies of enamel and/or dentin restorations performed with self-adhesive resins were eligible for selection. This systematic review concluded that the self-adhesive flowable resin showed results comparable to those of the conventional flowable resin. However, studies have shown that for restorations in Class I and V cavities, self-adhesive flowable composite resin performed better than restorations in Class II cavities.